Denitrification

The near absence of 02 results in vigorous denitrification [bacterial conversion of N03 to molecular nitrogen (N2)] within a layer that is several hundred metres thick and spreads over an area measuring around 1.4x 106km2 (Naqvi, 1994). This zone can be easily identified by the accumulation of nitrite (N02 ), the first intermediate of the reduction sequence (N03 N02 — N0 N20— N2) (Figs 6.14b and 6.15a). Note that N02 is also produced through assimila-tory reduction of N03 by phytoplankton and the oxidation of NH4+ (nitrification), but both these processes occur in oxic waters close to the surface (Codispoti Christensen, 1985). While the primary N02 maximum resulting from nitrification/assimilatory N03- reduction is ubiquitously found near the base 

Within the ODZ, nitrous oxide (N20), another major intermediate of denitrification (and a byproduct of nitrification), shows a trend of variability quite different from that of N02 (Fig. 6.15), but similar to that observed in the ODZs of the Pacific Ocean (Codispoti Christensen, 1985). That is, N20 concentration generally increases non-linearly with the depletion in 02 until the environment turns reducing thereafter, concomitant with the accumulation of secondary N02, a rapid fall in N20 concentration takes place. Accordingly, the SNM is characterized by a minimum in N20 concentration ( 10nM), whereas the oxic-suboxic interfaces are characterized by peak N20 levels exceeding 50nM (Law Owens, 1990 Naqvi Noronha, 1991). Attempts have been made to evaluate the relative importance of nitrification, denitrification and coupling between the two processes as pathways for N20 production by 

Arabian Sea, but unlike N20 their impact on global methane budget is insignificant (Owens etal., 1991). 

Nitrogen is returned to its atmospheric form by the action of denitrifying bacteria such as Pseudomonas thiobacillus and Micrococcus denitriflcans. The process is referred to as denitrification and represents the major mechanism of nitrogen loss in the overall nitrogen cycle whereby various forms of nitrogen in the soil revert to the N2 form. The reactions and their energetics are given below  

Reaction 8.21 is not spontaneous because of its positive AG°. Considering, however, that carbohydrates present in soil decompose spontaneously by the reaction 

In the absence of 02 but in the presence of carbohydrates, the N03 denitrifies through transferring electrons from the reduced organic carbon to nitrate N by the reaction 

Summing the AG° values of Reactions 8.21 and 8.22 shows that Reaction 8.23 gives a negative AG° thus, it is spontaneous and justifies the fact that microorganisms catalyze Reaction 8.23 to obtain energy. The ratio of organic C oxidized per unit of N reduced is 1.28. 

Nitrate in the soil environment, therefore, can undergo two distinct biochemical processes (1) assimilatory, where N03 is used to produced protein, and (2) dissimila-tory, where NOa is used to produce energy for microbes. The rate at which the latter process occurs depends indirectly on 02 availability, or Eh, and directly on available moisture, organic carbon content, and pH. The optimum pH is around neutral and the 

Certain denitrifying bacteria Pseudomoras stutzeri) and fungi Fusarium oxysporum) can incorporate nitrogen atoms into N2O from sources besides nitrite 

---

This justifies all the work undertaken to arrive at fuel denitrification which, as is well known, is difficult and costly. Moreover, technological improvements can bring considerable progress to this field. That is the case with low NO burners developed at IFF. These consist of producing separated flame jets that enable lower combustion temperatures, local oxygen concentrations to be less high and a lowered fuel s nitrogen contribution to NOj. formation. In a well defined industrial installation, the burner said to be of the low NO type can attain a level of 350 mg/Nm, instead of the 600 mg/Nm with a conventional burner. 

Bacterial remediation of selenium oxyanions in San Joaquin, California, drainage water is under active investigation (96,97), but has not yet been commercialized. Agricultural drainage rich in selenium is also typically rich in nitrates, so bioremediation must also include conditions that stimulate denitrification (98). Phytoextraction of selenium is also being tested, but is not yet being used on a large scale. 

Denitrification of wastewater in treatment plants offers another potential use for methanol. There are a few such plants in the world however, this use is not expected to grow appreciably, as there are more proven methods for nitrogen removal commercially available. 

Denitrification is a process in which facultative organisms will reduce nitrate to nitrogen gas in the absence of molecular oxygen. This consequendy results in the removal of BOD. The denitrification process also generates one hydroxyl ion so that alkalinity requirements are reduced to half when both nitrification and denitrification are practiced. 

The process of nitrification—denitrification can be practiced in one of two ways. In the oxidation ditch, nitrification occurs in the vicinity of the aerators. When the dissolved oxygen is depleted as the sludge—wastewater mixture passes from the aerator, denitrification occurs. 

In the two-stage process, nitrification occurs under aerobic conditions in the second stage. The nitrified mixed Hquor from the second stage is internally recycled to the anoxic first stage, where denitrification occurs. 

CBOD, Denitrification—municipal, Nevada Anoxic 1450 NH3-N Aerohic <25 0.05-0.3 0.1-0.5 7-14... 

The excesses of nitrogen application over crop uptake in the individual years from 1977 to 1986 were read from Figure 4 of Sylvester-Bradley et and subjected to the rules. Neither the leaching nor the denitrification losses seemed particularly large (Table 4), given that these were aggregate values for ten years, and the amount of nitrogen that was remineralized and then leached seemed very unlikely to be important. 

The interest in gaseous losses of nitrogen from soil is now extensive and includes the well established community of soil scientists concerned with losses of fertilizer-applied nitrogen by nitrification and denitrification. More recently, interest in ammonia losses from plants and soil has been stimulated by the very large emissions from intensive cattle production in the Netherlands and their... 

K. A. Smith and J. R. M. Arah, Losses of Nitrogen by Denitrification and Emissions of Nitrogen Oxides from Soils, The Fertiliser Soeiety, 1990, Proeeedings No. 299. 

Figure 6 The production and emission of NO and N,0 during nitrification and denitrification. NO / ...

In soil, microbial nitrification and denitrification are the predominant sources of NO and NjO and the emission fiiixes may be regarded as leakage during the transformation processes shown in Figure 6. Nitrifiers can produce NO and NjO during the oxidation of NH4 to NO3". Both gases are by-products of the nitrification pathway and the typical yield of NO in well-aerated soil is 1-4% of the NH4 oxidized and for NjO is less than... 

Nitric oxide and NjO are direct intermediates in the denitrification pathway, the reduction of NO3 to Nj. Reduction to Nj is often incomplete, so that both NjO and Nj are equally important end products of denitrification, the ratio of NjO/Nj production being determined by soil physical properties. For example, NjO is the main end-product in acid soils, whereas low redox potentials and high organic matter content favour the further reduction to Nitric... 

W. J. Payne, in Denitrification, Nitrification and Atmospheric Nitrons Oxide, ed. C. C. Delwiche,... 

Figure 7 The production and emission of NO during denitrification in agricultural soil treated with NO3 fertilizer (KNO3) and the nitrification inhibitor Dyciandiamide (10%) under aerobic (air) and anerobic conditions (N,). Fluxes are means from three soil columns, error bars represent standard deviations from the mean. V = vertical flow through the column H = Horizontal flow over the soil surface.

NO emissions did not exceed 2 ng Nm s and their measurement was only possible by chamber methods. The low NO emissions but high NjO emissions show that denitrification was the main source of NjO at this site. The discrepancies between the chamber and micrometeorological methods illustrated the need to define the flux-footprint of a micrometeorological measurement very carefully, and to use this information in the field to choose the locations in which chambers are placed. Without such an approach, the integration of results from chambers into estimates of field-scale emission remains an uncertain method. 

---