Transformation data representation

Data Representation. Transformations can be applied to the data so that they will more closely follow the normal distribution that is required for certain procedures or for removing (or lessening) unwanted influences. Certainly for data analysis in which major, minor, and trace elemental concentrations are used, some form of scaling is necessary to keep the variables with larger concentrations from having excessive weight in the calculation of many coefficients of similarity. 

Functional vs. data abstraction Functional abstraction refers to the case where a module has some kind of transformation/coordination character. Hence, an interface resource transforms some kind of input data into corresponding output data, or the component coordinates the resources of lower components. Functional abstraction facilitates the hiding of algorithmic details of this transformation/coordination. In contrast, data abstraction is present if the module encapsulates the access to some kind of memory or state . Then, the module hides the realization of the data representation. The module s interface only shows how the data can be used, not how it is mapped onto the underlying storage. 

The upper part of the block diagram in Fig. 4 depicts the watermark detection scheme for one stmcture Mj. First, the data is transformed into its canonical representation. Next, the received vector rj is extracted. The extraction method must be identical to the host vector extraction used for watermark embedding. Thus, the length of rj is also Lx J. Second, tlie 64-bit hash of Mj is derived and the pseudo-random vectors t j. kj and ij are computed dependent on the copyright holders key K. After applying tlie spread transform, the demodulated soft watennark letters yj are derived from and kj as described in Section 2. The probability p dn,j = 1) of receiving a watennark letter dnj = 1 from the nth clement of is given by... 

Multi-layer feedforward networks contain an input layer connected to one or more layers of hidden neurons (hidden units) and an output layer (Figure 3.5(b)). The hidden units internally transform the data representation to extract higher-order statistics. The input signals are applied to the neurons in the first hidden layer, the output signals of that layer are used as inputs to the next layer, and so on for the rest of the network. The output signals of the neurons in the output layer reflect the overall response of the network to the activation pattern supplied by the source nodes in the input layer. This type of network is especially useful for pattern association (i.e., mapping input vectors to output vectors). 

DDD is a transformation system that operates on expressions of these forms. It as a first-order reasoning tool in which implementation proofs are presented as algebraic derivations. It is proficient at the large-scale formal manipulations involved as structure is imposed on a behavioral specification and as concrete data representations are introduced. A proof consists of an initial expression and a sequence of constructions and transformations together with any side conditions they generate. In practice, one also needs the intermediate expressions in order to address the subexpressions to be manipulated. 

The variables T ax and represent the hmits of the time interval the second or indirect dimension is recorded in. The index inc refers to the indirect spectral dimension. As wiU later be seen, the direct dimension can originate from two different data sets, then A B, or from the same data set, hence A = B. In the latter case, one data set is merely the transpose of the other one. Within a representation such as Eq. (5.5), the two data sets— which contain mixed time—frequency data before and frequency—frequency data after transformation—are correlated by a shared indirect dimension. The common feature can be understood as a perturbation, the dimension hence called perturbation dimension. 

System overview, design representations, transformations, architectural partitioning, scheduling, data path synthesis, microprocessor synthesis, a fifth-order digital elliptic wave filter example, a Kalman filter example, the BTL310, the MCS6502, and the MC68000. 

Data acquisition. The process of transforming spectrometer signals from their original form into suitable representations, with or without modification, with or without a computer system. 

Data reduction. The process of transforming the initial digital or analog representation of output from a spectrometer into a form that is amenable to interpretation, e.g., a bar graph, a table of masses versus intensities. 

Particulate systems composed of identical particles are extremely rare. It is therefore usefiil to represent a polydispersion of particles as sets of successive size intervals, containing information on the number of particle, length, surface area, or mass. The entire size range, which can span up to several orders of magnitude, can be covered with a relatively small number of intervals. This data set is usually tabulated and transformed into a graphical representation. 

In this work, the crisp numerical data for the analyte and reference samples were transformed into the fuzzy form with the application of the L/ -representation. The procedure of fuzzyfication is illustrated roughly by the figure, where a and b are the nominal (crisp) measured values ... 

Figure 3.4 Schematic representation of the steps involved in obtaining a two-dimensional NMR spectrum. (A) Many FIDs are recorded with incremented values of the evolution time and stored. (B) Each of the FIDs is subjected to Fourier transformation to give a corresponding number of spectra. The data are transposed in such a manner that the spectra are arranged behind one another so that each peak is seen to undergo a sinusoidal modulation with A second series of Fourier transformations is carried out across these columns of peaks to produce the two-dimensional plot shown in (C).

At the end of the 2D experiment, we will have acquired a set of N FIDs composed of quadrature data points, with N /2 points from channel A and points from channel B, acquired with sequential (alternate) sampling. How the data are processed is critical for a successful outcome. The data processing involves (a) dc (direct current) correction (performed automatically by the instrument software), (b) apodization (window multiplication) of the <2 time-domain data, (c) Fourier transformation and phase correction, (d) window multiplication of the t domain data and phase correction (unless it is a magnitude or a power-mode spectrum, in which case phase correction is not required), (e) complex Fourier transformation in Fu (f) coaddition of real and imaginary data (if phase-sensitive representation is required) to give a magnitude (M) or a power-mode (P) spectrum. Additional steps may be tilting, symmetrization, and calculation of projections. A schematic representation of the steps involved is presented in Fig. 3.5. 

Fig. 31.2. Geometrical example of the duality of data space and the concept of a common factor space, (a) Representation of n rows (circles) of a data table X in a space Sf spanned by p columns. The pattern P" is shown in the form of an equiprobabi lity ellipse. The latent vectors V define the orientations of the principal axes of inertia of the row-pattern, (b) Representation of p columns (squares) of a data table X in a space y spanned by n rows. The pattern / is shown in the form of an equiprobability ellipse. The latent vectors U define the orientations of the principal axes of inertia of the column-pattern, (c) Result of rotation of the original column-space S toward the factor-space S spanned by r latent vectors. The original data table X is transformed into the score matrix S and the geometric representation is called a score plot, (d) Result of rotation of the original row-space S toward the factor-space S spanned by r latent vectors. The original data table X is transformed into the loading table L and the geometric representation is referred to as a loading plot, (e) Superposition of the score and loading plot into a biplot.

Correspondence factor analysis can be described in three steps. First, one applies a transformation to the data which involves one of the three types of closure that have been described in the previous section. This step also defines two vectors of weight coefficients, one for each of the two dual spaces. The second step comprises a generalization of the usual singular value decomposition (SVD) or eigenvalue decomposition (EVD) to the case of weighted metrics. In the third and last step, one constructs a biplot for the geometrical representation of the rows and columns in a low-dimensional space of latent vectors. 

Unipolar and bipolar axes have been discussed in Section 31.2. Briefly, a unipolar axis is defined by the origin and the representation of a row or column. A bipolar axis is drawn through the representations of two rows or through the representations of two columns. Projections upon unipolar axes reproduce the values in the transformed data table. Projections upon bipolar axes reproduce the contrasts (i.e. differences) between values in the data table. 

---