Reaction rate/current density

The applied current density is the difference between the total anodic and the total cathodic current densities (reaction rates) at a given potential ... 

FIGURE 2.1 (a) Examples of polarization characteristics of a fuel cell cathode and anode outlining the definition of the overpotential as deviation from the equilibrium (theoretical) potential at a given current density (reaction rate), (b) Overall cell polarization as a sum of anode and cathode polarization and the power of a fuel cell as an integral of the voltage by the current. Usual figures of merit are indicated on both polarization and power curves. 

As in Eq. (3.22), F is the Faraday constant, n is the number of electrons taking part in the reaction, but iq is a new quantity called the exchange current density. These rates have units of mol/cm s, so the exchange current density has units of A/cm. Typical values of io for some common oxidation and reduction reactions of various metals are shown in Table 3.4. Like reversible potentials, exchange current densities are influenced by temperature, surface roughness, and such factors as the ratio of oxidized and reduced species present in the system. Therefore, they must be determined experimentally. 

In what has been presented so far, it has been made clear that in the example of the hydrogen evolution reaction (h.e.r.), the degree of occupancy of the surface with adsorbed H (i.e., the radical intermediate) builds up with time after the electric current is switched on. The steady state of a reaction is defined as that state at which this buildup of intermediate radicals in the reaction has come to an end. As long as electronic instrumentation is present to keep control of the electrode potential (and the ambient conditions remain the same), the current density—the rate of electrical reaction per unit area—should then be constant. (This assumes a plentiful supply of reactants, i.e., no diffusion control.) It is advisable to add should be, because— particularly for electrode reactions on solids that involve the presence of radicals and are therefore subject to the properties of the surface—the latter may change relatively slowly (seconds) and a corresponding (and unplanned) change in reaction rate (observable in seconds and even minutes) may occur (Section 7.5.10). 

In interfacial electrochemical reaction rates given by the Butler—Volmcr equation (7.24), the current density, or rate of reaction per unit area, is zero at zero oveipotential (equilibrium), but significant net currents are observed if the potential of the working electrode is displaced from the reversible potential by only 1 mV. In the case of rate-controlling nucleation, however, there is no detectable current until the oveipotential exceeds a few millivolts, after which (at, say, 7 mV), the reaction rate suddenly undergoes an explosive increase. 

In the lower current density region, reaction (15.7) is rate determining and at the higher current densities, reaction (15.5) is rate determining. 

Fig. 4 shows a simple phase diagram for a metal (1) covered with a passivating oxide layer (2) contacting the electrolyte (3) with the reactions at the interfaces and the transfer processes across the film. This model is oversimplified. Most passive layers have a multilayer structure, but usually at least one of these partial layers has barrier character for the transfer of cations and anions. Three main reactions have to be distinguished. The corrosion in the passive state involves the transfer of cations from the metal to the oxide, across the oxide and to the electrolyte (reaction 1). It is a matter of a detailed kinetic investigation as to which part of this sequence of reactions is the rate-determining step. The transfer of O2 or OH- from the electrolyte to the film corresponds to film growth or film dissolution if it occurs in the opposite direction (reaction 2). These anions will combine with cations to new oxide at the metal/oxide and the oxide/electrolyte interface. Finally, one has to discuss electron transfer across the layer which is involved especially when cathodic redox processes have to occur to compensate the anodic metal dissolution and film formation (reaction 3). In addition, one has to discuss the formation of complexes of cations at the surface of the passive layer, which may increase their transfer into the electrolyte and thus the corrosion current density (reaction 4). The scheme of Fig. 4 explains the interaction of the partial electrode processes that are linked to each other by the elec-... 

At the higher current density, Reaction 1.26 was rate determining. The adsorbed C02 ion present in the mechanism was discovered in the electrode in an early application of FTIR spectroscopy applied to mechanism analysis. 

This equation gives a relation between the current density (or rate of electrode reactions) as a function of the overpotential, t], under the limiting condition when electron transfer at the interface is easy (nearly at equilibrium in fact) and the major difficulty in making the reaction go is diffusion to the interface from the solution. 

A typical diffusion-controlled reaction is the cathodic deposition of copper from acidified solutions of cuprie sulfate. Under agitation, at relatively high current densities, the rate equation is ... 

Regarding the effect of current density, the rate of COD and ammonium oxidation increases with current density, as it is exemplified in Fig. 2 [18]. This suggests that, at higher current densities, indirect oxidation by means of chlorine-mediated reactions plays an important role in the overall electrochemical oxidation of organics. With this in mind, several authors [4, 19] have increased the original concentration of chloride... 

FACTORS AFFECTING REACTION RATE AND CURRENT 1.4.1 Current, current density, and rate... 

Exchange Current Density The rate of electron exchange between cathodic and anodic reactions on an electrode at equilibrium. 

The mass transfer regime which influences maximum current density the rate of production of intermediates and the extent of mixing between the reaction layer at the surface and the bulk solution. The mass transport regime is determined by the electrolyte flow rate, movement of the electrodes or turbulence promoters. 

The j-V dependence attains a saturation value in region 3 of Fig. 2. It cannot be explained as a diffusion phenomenon as discussed earlier. The lack of predicted further current increase (relation (18), Fig. 12) can be explained as the effect of the partial blockade of an electrode surface. With increased electrode overpotential the reaction rate increases, as does the rate of formation of gas bubbles at the interface. The permanent gas layer is built up (Fig. 13). The formation of such a layer can be partially due to the vaporization of liquid caused by increased electrode surface temperature with high current density. The rate of these processes equilibrates at the given cell voltage, and a plateau region in the j-V dependence appears. 

As expected, the value of jjdifif increases with increasing current densities. Reaction overpotential Both the overpotentials mentioned above are normally of greater importance than the reaction overpotential. But sometimes it may happen that other phenomena which occur in the electrolyte or during electrode processes such as adsorption and desorption are the rate-limiting factors. 

It is easier to see what experiments should be done in the electrode kinetic regime. Some basic electrode kinetics at polymer-solution interfaces must be measured - and this has not been successfully done. Thus, with the typical redox reactions of the ferrous/ferric type, it is important to establish Tafel parameters, particularly the parameter beta, and exchange current densities and rate constants. 

Mass-Limiting Current Density We previously examined ohmic limiting current density. Now we consider the case of mass transfer hmiting current density U. At the mass transport limiting current density, the rate of mass transport to the reactant surface is insufficient to promote the rate of consumption required for reaction. In this case, the local concentration of reactant will be reduced to zero, which, from Eq. (4.84), must also reduce the cell voltage to zero. Assuming the surface concentration Cr) is zero at the limiting state (//)... 

At higher current densities, the primary electron transfer rate is usually no longer limiting instead, limitations arise tluough the slow transport of reactants from the solution to the electrode surface or, conversely, the slow transport of the product away from the electrode (diffusion overpotential) or tluough the inability of chemical reactions coupled to the electron transfer step to keep pace (reaction overpotential). 

Cyclic voltammetry provides a simple method for investigating the reversibility of an electrode reaction (table Bl.28.1). The reversibility of a reaction closely depends upon the rate of electron transfer being sufficiently high to maintain the surface concentrations close to those demanded by the electrode potential through the Nemst equation. Therefore, when the scan rate is increased, a reversible reaction may be transfomied to an irreversible one if the rate of electron transfer is slow. For a reversible reaction at a planar electrode, the peak current density, fp, is given by... 

Many factors other than current influence the rate of machining. These involve electrolyte type, rate of electrolyte flow, and other process conditions. For example, nickel machines at 100% current efficiency, defined as the percentage ratio of the experimental to theoretical rates of metal removal, at low current densities, eg, 25 A/cm. If the current density is increased to 250 A/cm the efficiency is reduced typically to 85—90%, by the onset of other reactions at the anode. Oxygen gas evolution becomes increasingly preferred as the current density is increased. 

---