Current closed circuit

Closed circuit voltage is the voltage of a cell or battery when the battery is producing current into the external circuit. 

Sometimes a coupling insulation as indicated at location 2 in Figure 10.8 may also prevent the eddy currents forming a closed circuit and generate the bearing currents. 

In 1821, Thomas Seebeck, an Estonian physician, discovered the existence of an electric current in a closed circuit consisting of unlike conductors, when the junctions between the conductors were at different temperatures. This discovei y is the basis for ther-... 

Seebeck s outstanding scientific achievement was the discovei"y of one of the three classical thermoelectric effects, which are the Seebeck, the Peltier, and the Thomson effects. Seebeck s discovery was the first, dating from 1822—1823, followed by that of Jean-Charles-Athanase Peltier in 1832 and that of William Thomson in 1854. Seebeck obseiwed that an electric current in a closed circuit comprised different metallic components if he heated the junctions of the components to different temperatures. He noted that the effect increases linearly with the applied temperature difference and that it crucially depends on the choice of materials. Seebeck tested most of the available metallic materials for thermoelectricity. His studies were further systematized by the French physicist... 

Figure 15-21. Shon circuit current (closed circles) and photocurrent al -1 V bias (open circles) as a function of light intensity for the 1T0/ MEH-FFV/Cho/Au device (reproduced by pennission of the American Institute of Physics from Ref.

The resistors in this example were tweaked slightly to achieve a current close to 1 mA. We will now see how this circuit performs with temperature changes. 

During the excitation discharge phase, however, use of the closed current loop circuit results in a back emf (electromotive force) across the source... 

Since the closed current loop circuit is used ubiquitously, present circuits and electrical power systems a priori cannot exhibit COP > 1.0, since they violate Eq. (8) during their excitation discharge. Hence they violate condition 3 required for COP >1.0. 

To restore the destroyed dipole, the operator must input as much energy as was required to destroy it. But with the closed current loop circuit, this operator input a priori is greater than the useful output of work in the load. Hence the coefficient of performance (COP) of this closed current loop system (with unitary m/q of the charge carriers) is self-limited to COP < 1.0. 

We eventually identified the ubiquitous closed current loop circuit [17]7 as the culprit that enforces a special kind of Lorentz symmetry during discharge of... 

More rigorously, this is any closed current loop circuit where the charge carriers in all portions of the loop have the same m/q ratio. For example, battery-powered circuits do not meet that condition, since the internal ionic currents between the battery plates may have m/q ratios several hundred times the m/q ratio of the electrons that pass between the outsides of the two plates and through the external circuit containing the load. With Bedini s process, a battery-powered system can be made to charge its batteries at the same time that it powers its load see Bearden [17]. 

That our normal EM power systems do not exhibit COP> 1.0 is purely a matter of the arbitrary design of the systems. They are all designed with closed current loop circuits, which can readily be shown to apply the Lorentz symmetric regauging condition during their excitation discharge in the load. Hence all such systems — so long as the current in the loop is unitary (its charge carriers have the same m/q ratio) — can exhibit only COP< 1.0 for a system with internal losses, or COP =1.0 for a superconductive system with no internal losses. 

Initial current Momentary current wherf in closed circuit circuit is sharply broken... 

If a cell is operated potentiometrically, then only two electrodes are required. However, if closed-circuit operation is to be employed it is necessary to measure electrode overpotentials. To measure electrode overpotentials it is necessary to use a three-electrode DC system. The system consists of a working electrode which is exposed to reaction conditions, a counter electrode (which is exposed to a constant partial pressure of oxygen in the case of an oxygen-ion conducting electrolyte), and a reference electrode. The reference electrode remains unpolarized during the measurements and may be exposed to either reaction conditions or the constant conditions of the counter electrode. A power supply is used to polarise the working and counter electrodes while the current is recorded (see Figure 3). 

In this section the use of amperometric techniques for the in-situ study of catalysts using solid state electrochemical cells is discussed. This requires that the potential of the cell is disturbed from its equilibrium value and a current passed. However, there is evidence that for a number of solid electrolyte cell systems the change in electrode potential results in a change in the electrode-catalyst work function.5 This effect is known as the non-faradaic electrochemical modification of catalytic activity (NEMCA). In a similar way it appears that the electrode potential can be used as a monitor of the catalyst work function. Much of the work on the closed-circuit behaviour of solid electrolyte electrochemical cells has been concerned with modifying the behaviour of the catalyst (reference 5 is an excellent review of this area). However, it is not the intention of this review to cover catalyst modification, rather the intention is to address information derived from closed-circuit work relevant to an unmodified catalyst surface. 

Steady-state Current Overpotential Behaviour - For a simple single charge-transfer process equation (2.28) describes the closed-circuit behaviour. At low overpotentials, the current and overpotential are linearly related and the exchange current density can be evaluated from the gradient (see equation... 

---