Costs processing cost

Labor cost/processing cost by people— disassembly, repair/restoration, remanufacture, disposaL etc. Economy-oriented People... 

Fixed raw materials cost - - enzyme cost + processing cost... 

Material Material cost/ Processing cost/ Total/ ... 

Part Cost = material costs + processing costs... 

Cosmetics industry Cosmic radiation Cosmid vectors Cosmocil CQ CoS04 7H20 Cosorb process Cost estimates... 

Table 5. Estimated U.S. Processing Costs of Waste Disposal Method ...

Polymer recycling process costs for various operations are summarized in Table 6. 

Process costs for the methanolysis and glycolysis of PET to produce monomers are similar. Cost estimates are summarized in Table 8. 

M-type ferrites are mainly used as permanent magnet material. They have largely replaced the alnicos as preferred permanent magnet material, as a result of the lower material and processing costs. These ferrites were first introduced under the trade name Ferroxdure, the isotropic form in 1952 (22) and the anisotropic (crystal oriented) form in 1954 (23), and are widely available commercially under various trade names such as Oxid and Koerox. They cover about 55% of the world market of permanent magnet materials, corresponding to 1100 million U.S. doUars (1991), as weU as 55% of the U.S. market, at 300 million. 

Solvent extraction removes chlorophyll and other pigments to give a light-colored product but increases processing costs. Furthermore, solvent extraction removes p-carotene and reduces vitamin A activity (89) (see Terpenoids Vitamins). Supercritical CO2 extraction at 30 and 70 MPa (4,350 and 10,150 psi) and 40°C removed 90 and 70% carotene and lutein, respectively, from alfalfa LPC (96). This process avoids organic solvent residues and recovers valuable by-products. 

The need to meet environmental regulations can affect processing costs. Undesirable air emissions may have to be eliminated and Hquid effluents and soHd residues treated and disposed of by incineration or/and landfilling. It is possible for biomass conversion processes that utilize waste feedstocks to combine waste disposal and treatment with energy and/or biofuel production so that credits can be taken for negative feedstock costs and tipping or receiving fees. 

Process Costs, Wulff Acetylene," Chem. Process. Eng. 47(2), 71 (1966). 

Some of the economic hurdles and process cost centers of this conventional carbohydrate fermentation process, schematically shown in Eigure 1, are in the complex separation steps which are needed to recover and purify the product from the cmde fermentation broths. Eurthermore, approximately a ton of gypsum, CaSO, by-product is produced and needs to be disposed of for every ton of lactic acid produced by the conventional fermentation and recovery process (30). These factors have made large-scale production by this conventional route economically and ecologically unattractive. 

High demands are placed on the substrate material of disk-shaped optical data storage devices regarding the optical, physical, chemical, mechanical, and thermal properties. In addition to these physical parameters, they have to meet special requirements regarding optical purity of the material, processing characteristics, and especially in mass production, economic characteristics (costs, processing). The question of recyclabiUty must also be tackled. 

Processing costs include those for size reduction, size classification, minerals concentration and separations, soHd—Hquid separation (dewatering), materials handling and transportation, and tailings disposal. Size reduction, one of the most expensive unit operations in minerals processing, could account for as much as 50% of the total energy consumed. This cost varies considerably from deposit to deposit and quite often from one area of a deposit to another. Ore bodies are extremely heterogeneous and the associated minerals Hberation, complex. 

Solvent extraction is a relatively high cost process, owing to the specialty organic extractants required and the expenses of recovery and storage of... 

Process Instrumentation and Control Systems. Investment for instmmentation and control systems and their installation typically range between 3 to 10% of the total installed cost for a grassroots continuous process faciUty. Instmmentation and control systems also represent a substantial percentage of the overall faciUty maintenance (qv) costs. Investment costs may be placed in one of two categories, ie, nondiscretionary and discretionary. 

---