Corrosion galvanostatic measurements

Most electrochemical testing conducted to date has used various DC approaches. The most common methods involve linear polarization (to determine the polarization resistance for calculation of corrosion current via the Stem-Geary equation) [44] and potentiodynamic polarization (to determine breakdown and repassivation potentials). Other tests are also conducted, however. For example, long-term open circuit potential versus time measurements, potentiostatic chronoamperometry, and galvanostatic measurements are occasionally conducted for specialized purposes. 

Hickling", in attempting to study the corrosion of steels under thin film conditions that simulate atmospheric exposure, took into account the time-dependence of polarisation measurements, and developed a technique using galvanostatic transients. 

Polarization probes. Polarization methods other than LPR are also of use in process control and corrosion analysis, but only a few systems are offered commercially. These systems use such polarization techniques as galvanodynamic or potentiodynamic, potentiostatic or galvanostatic, potentiostaircase or galvanostaircase, or cyclic polarization methods. Some systems involving these techniques are, in fact, used regularly in processing plants. These methods are used in situ or in the laboratory to measure corrosion. Polarization probes have been successful in reducing corrosion-related failures in chemical plants. 

Although the CMT method was originally developed to measure the corrosion rate at the corrosion potential, it has been demonstrated that it can also be used, with some restrictions, to measure the dissolution rate of a polarized electrode. The device for polarization can be a galvanostat or a potentiostat, the operation of which must not interfere with the pH measurements. Most important, the counter electrode must be in the same cell compartment as the experimental electrode and its content well mixed. 

Electrochemical noise measurements may be performed in the potentiostatic mode (current noise is measured), the galvanostatic mode (potential noise is measured), or in the ZRA mode (zero resistance ammeter mode, whereby both current and potential noise are measured under open-circuit conditions). In the ZRA mode, two nominally identical metal samples (electrodes) are used and the ZRA effectively shorts them together while permitting the current flow between them to be measured. At the same time, the potential of the coupled electrodes is measured versus a low-noise reference electrode (or in some cases a third identical electrode). The ZRA mode is commonly used for corrosion monitoring. 

D.A. Jones, The advantages of galvanostatic polarization resistance measurements. Corrosion 39 (1983) 444-448. 

For RBP, a logarithmic current density range of 2.5 to 6 mA/cm was used, as shown in Figure 7.13. Treated samples at 60,100, and 120 N are shown, whereas the other samples are not shown because of crowdedness in the figure. Potentiostatic polarization measurements were carried out using a Radiometer Analytical model PGZ 100 potentiostat/galvanostat with VoltaLab software. The electrochemical parameters—corrosion potential corrosion current... 

Pitting and crevice corrosion are associated with the breakdown of passivity [SO]. Electrochemical tests for evaluating the susceptibility of a material to pitting and to crevice corrosion include potentiodynamic, potentiostatic, scratch potentiostatic, potentiostaircase, tribo-eUipsometric methods, pit-propagation rate curves, galvanostatic, and electrochemical noise measurements [80-S2]. 

---