Legal contracts

What legal obligations are typical in a tolling contract ... 

Legal Obligations, Defining Boundaries, Contract Topics... 

In addition to the laws and regulations that govern the handling of the substances involved in the process, the parties have legal obligations to one another as stated in the contract. Contract topics that specify boundaries may include ... 

The contract can specify the amount of time the client needs to remove its materials from the toller s facility and lays out notification procedures for dissolving the contract. Chapter 6, Closure and Audit, Example 6-1 is a sample contract termination checklist. It is an illustration of one company s inventoiy list for closing out a tolling project. It addresses material, financial, legal and environmental considerations. 

There are two types of resource requirements those needed to run the business and those needed to execute particular contracts or sales. The standard is not specific, but a glance at ISO 9004-1 will reveal that it is more than those needed for a particular contract and less than needed to run the business. ISO 9004-1 limits the resources to those needed to implement the quality policy and meet quality objectives. It will be very difficult for companies to distinguish between those resources which serve quality and those which serve other objectives. There may be some departments that can be eliminated, such as the legal, insurance, catering, medical, or publicity departments, but in a company-wide quality culture all departments etc. will be included. 

You could be forgiven for restricting your quality system to the products or services you supply because all the requirements in the standard except clause 4.3 focus on an end product or service conforming to specified requirements. Contract or order requirements will go beyond end product or service requirements. They will address delivery, quantity, warranty, payment, and other legal obligations. With every product one provides a service for instance one may provide delivery to destination, invoices for payment. 

It is very important to understand that an insurance policy is a legal document, and insurance negotiations should be approached on this basis. Insurance contracts have a detailed legal background of both case law and common law in the interpretation of their provisions. Professional insurance advice from a reputable source, whether an insurance company or an insurance broker, is essential if problems are to be avoided. 

It is essential to have any agreement properly drawn up in conjunction with the organization s legal section and to use reputable and busy heat service companies. It is important to lay down strict details of the period of the contract and of the services to be provided so that future legal difficulties can be avoided. 

Particularly if the industry is government regulated (i.e., pharmaceuticals), but also if the supply contract with the customer stipulates numerical specification limits for a variety of quality indieators, the compliance question is legal in nature (rules are set for the method, the number of samples and repeat determinations) the analyst can then only improve precision by honing his/her skills,... 

Johnson [17] identifies several topics related to liability, and she offers an important distinction as well. Among the topics related to liability and computer use in general are legal liability, the duty of honesty, the nature of contracts, misrepresentation, express and implied warranties, and negligence [17]. The relevant distinction concerns the nature of software as either a product or a service. Many of these topics hold little interest for the ethicist investigating computer ethics. For instance, legal liability is less important to philosophy than to jurisprudence. 

If a test facility or an archive contracting facility goes out of business and has no legal successor, the archive should be transferred to the archives of the sponsor of the regulatory study. 

In applying this doctrine here, it is the high duty of this Tribunal to ensure that it is neither extended beyond the bounds of justice and hard common sense, nor contracted into a Seshless legal stereotype of no real meaning in these restless times. 

Legal contracts have the same structure (and are far more muddled) title, terms and definitions, actual contractual conditions using those terms... 

ASTM standards are developed voluntarily and used voluntarily. They become legally binding only when a government body makes them so or when they are cited in a contract... 

The contents of this publication are not intended to be and should not be construed to be a standard of the American Society of Civil Engineers ASCE) and arc not intended for use as a reference in purchase specifications, contracts, regulations, statutes, or any other legal document. 

American traders who have been visiting China since the Chinese opened the door to the US continue to meet their share of frustrations. The Chinese are only now allowing foreigners to deal with end-users of the products, but trade continues to be conducted "Chinese style"—that is, the Chinese reluctantly enter into long-term contracts—but there is still an absence of a conventional legal system in which to conduct trade. 

The story of how this principle became the accepted legal doctrine in this country is a curious one. Professional employees traditionally had been employed under oral or, in some cases, written employment contracts that ran for an indefinite term. Under the English common law, when no particular term of employment was stated, the hiring was presumed to be for one years service. If the employment continued beyond one year, it was thereafter terminable only at the end of an additional year. Other than this power unilaterally to terminate at one-year intervals, both parties, under the English rule, would be bound as long as they both remain satisfied with the performance and the working conditions. In other words, except for the power to terminate automatically on the anniversary of the date on which the contract was made, both parties could terminate only for a good cause shown. 

In the United States the rule was quite different. Unless the life of the employment contract is specifically spelled out, such a hiring is deemed terminable at will by either party. Whether the contract provides for payment at stated intervals, such as every two weeks, once a month, etc., or even characterizes the employment as permanent, has no effect upon the legal result. The contract is terminable at the will of either party. 

---