Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Contaminant yield factors

Since the catalyst is so important to the cracking operation, its activity, selectivity, and other important properties should be measured. A variety of fixed or fluidized bed tests have been used, in which standard feedstocks are cracked over plant catalysts and the results compared with those for standard samples. Activity is expressed as conversion, yield of gasoline, or as relative activity. Selectivity is expressed in terms of carbon producing factor (CPF) and gas producing factor (GPF). These may be related to catalyst addition rates, surface area, and metals contamination from feedstocks. [Pg.17]

An ideal method for the preconcentration of trace metals from natural waters should have the following characteristics it should simultaneously allow isolation of the analyte from the matrix and yield an appropriate enrichment factor it should be a simple process, requiring the introduction of few reagents in order to minimise contamination, hence producing a low sample blank and a correspondingly lower detection limit and it should produce a final solution that is readily matrix-matched with solutions of the analytical calibration method. [Pg.303]

After adjusting for the confounding factors of age, sex, nutritional status, and season, harbor porpoises (Phocoena phocoena) that died from disease had higher levels of PCBs than victims of trauma [80], providing a more rigorous evaluation of the link between contaminants, the immune system and disease outcome in marine mammals. Such studies can yield insight into the real world of immunotoxicity among marine... [Pg.413]

Study, SPE sampling of >6>C-associated residues cannot be ruled out. Also, no data are available on the potential of the surficial retention of colloids or DOC by the SPE sorbent. These factors would lead to an overestimation of dissolved concentrations. Other sampling equipment may also yield inaccurate measurements of dissolved concentrations. Pre-equilibration of laboratory exposure systems is a separate issue related to attainment of steady-state water concentrations in the exposure system prior to initiation of the test. Clearly, the issue of DOC or colloidally sorbed contaminants deserves additional discussion. [Pg.52]

A simple correlation was determined for estimating the Setschenow constants for a variety of organic solntes in seawater, which yields an overall reduction in solnbility by a factor 1.36 (Xie et al. 1997). The hydrophobicity of organic solutes increases by this factor, but the salting-out effect must be quantified when comparing the behavior of specific organic contaminants in fresh water and in subsnrface aqueous solutions. [Pg.138]

Temperature and moisture content are other important factors that control volatilization of organic contaminants in the subsurface. Spencer and Cliath (1969, 1973) showed that a temperature increase from 20°C to 40°C led to an increase in dieldrin vapor density from 45 ng/L to 700ng/L (Fig. 8.7a). It also may be observed that a reduction in the soil moisture content caused a large reduction in the dieldrin vapor densities, even when the pesticide concentration in the moist soil was high enough to yield vapor densities approaching those of the pure compound. These results explain why reduction in pesticide volatilization in dry soils was observed over many years. [Pg.159]

In Figure 10.4 was plotted the contaminant coke yield as a function of Ni equivalent. In this graph it is observed that the signal C, expressed as grams of contaminant coke, is almost a linear function of Ni equivalent. When the vanadium factor is changed to 0.38 the ratio is completely linear. Then with this technique it is possible to find the real dehydrogenation factor of vanadium with respect to nickel. [Pg.149]

The maximum production rate, however, often results in nnacceptable recovery yields. Low recovery yield requires further processing by recycling the mixed fractions. The recovery yield at the maximum production rate strongly depends on the separation factor. In the cases of difficnlt separations, when the separation factor under linear conditions is aronnd or lower than a= 1.1, the recovery yield is not higher than 40%-60%. Even in the case of a=1.8, the recovery yield at the maximum production rate is only about 70%-80%. The situation is still less favorable in displacement chromatography, particularly if the component to be purified is more retained than the limiting impurity. In this case, from one side the impurity, whereas from the other side the displacer, contaminates the product. [Pg.303]

Figure 4. Comparative accumulation of actinides by small mammals from contaminated soil or sediment relative to the accumulation of plutonium-239. Accumulation factor (AF) = concentration of nuclide in the internal small mammal body -- concentration of nuclide in dry soil. Twelve shrews and seven rats and mice from a floodplain forest were composited to yield four and three separate analyses, respectively. Twelve cotton rats inhabiting the banks of a liquid waste pond (3513) also were analyzed. Figure 4. Comparative accumulation of actinides by small mammals from contaminated soil or sediment relative to the accumulation of plutonium-239. Accumulation factor (AF) = concentration of nuclide in the internal small mammal body -- concentration of nuclide in dry soil. Twelve shrews and seven rats and mice from a floodplain forest were composited to yield four and three separate analyses, respectively. Twelve cotton rats inhabiting the banks of a liquid waste pond (3513) also were analyzed.
The principal disadvantage of this procedure is that only one alkyl group of the trialkylborane is constructively utilized. The reaction is also sensitive to steric factors. Although yields are excellent for terminal olefins, reaction becomes more sluggish and yields of ketone decrease progressively as steric effects in the trialkylborane are increased. The method is thus of limited utility for rare olefins. However, the overall simplicity of procedure, mildness of reaction conditions, and absence of any isomeric contaminants recommend the method for reactions involving rarer diazocarbonyl substrates. [Pg.83]


See other pages where Contaminant yield factors is mentioned: [Pg.87]    [Pg.152]    [Pg.126]    [Pg.83]    [Pg.355]    [Pg.139]    [Pg.514]    [Pg.573]    [Pg.1300]    [Pg.34]    [Pg.190]    [Pg.495]    [Pg.707]    [Pg.229]    [Pg.393]    [Pg.16]    [Pg.125]    [Pg.164]    [Pg.459]    [Pg.374]    [Pg.420]    [Pg.841]    [Pg.225]    [Pg.622]    [Pg.237]    [Pg.229]    [Pg.91]    [Pg.227]    [Pg.184]    [Pg.529]    [Pg.155]    [Pg.435]    [Pg.358]    [Pg.125]    [Pg.81]    [Pg.280]    [Pg.623]    [Pg.355]    [Pg.806]   


SEARCH



Contaminated factors

Contamination factors

Yield factor

© 2024 chempedia.info