Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Computational fluid dynamics profile

Computer Models, The actual residence time for waste destmction can be quite different from the superficial value calculated by dividing the chamber volume by the volumetric flow rate. The large activation energies for chemical reaction, and the sensitivity of reaction rates to oxidant concentration, mean that the presence of cold spots or oxidant deficient zones render such subvolumes ineffective. Poor flow patterns, ie, dead zones and bypassing, can also contribute to loss of effective volume. The tools of computational fluid dynamics (qv) are useful in assessing the extent to which the actual profiles of velocity, temperature, and oxidant concentration deviate from the ideal (40). [Pg.57]

Computational fluid dynamic (CFD) calculations were performed to give the Pd concentration profile in a nanopore of the oxide catalyst carrier layer [283]. For wet chemical deposition most of the catalyst was deposited in the pore mouth, in the first 4 pm of the pore. Thus, most of the hydrogenation reaction is expected to occur in this location. For electrochemical deposition, large fractions of the catalyst are located... [Pg.170]

In solid-liquid mixing design problems, the main features to be determined are the flow patterns in the vessel, the impeller power draw, and the solid concentration profile versus the solid concentration. In principle, they could be readily obtained by resorting to the CFD (computational fluid dynamics) resolution of the appropriate multiphase fluid mechanics equations. Historically, simplified methods have first been proposed in the literature, which do not use numerical intensive computation. The most common approach is the dispersion-sedimentation phenomenological model. It postulates equilibrium between the particle flux due to sedimentation and the particle flux resuspended by the turbulent diffusion created by the rotating impeller. [Pg.2753]

The above derivation assumes straight streamlines and a monotonic velocity profile that depends on only one spatial variable, r. These assumptions substantially ease the derivation but are not necessary. Analytical expressions for the RTDs have been derived for noncircular ducts, non-Newtonian fluids, and helically coiled tubes. Computational fluid dynamics has been used for really complicated geometries such as motionless mixers. [Pg.553]

Fig. 10.8 Effect of interfacial boundary conditions on the predicted flow from a two-dimensional computational fluid dynamics ° model with a profiled tool, (a, b) Velocity vectors and the boundary at which the effective strain rate is 2 s b (c, d)... Fig. 10.8 Effect of interfacial boundary conditions on the predicted flow from a two-dimensional computational fluid dynamics ° model with a profiled tool, (a, b) Velocity vectors and the boundary at which the effective strain rate is 2 s b (c, d)...
Fig.10.9 Example of two-dimensional tool profiles tested by computational fluid dynamics modeling. Source Ref 45-47, 50... Fig.10.9 Example of two-dimensional tool profiles tested by computational fluid dynamics modeling. Source Ref 45-47, 50...
Kashid et al. studied the fiow patterns within the slugs and mass transfer between two consecutive slugs in liquid-liquid slug flow using a finite element-based computational fluid dynamics (CFD) model [51]. The model equations are implemented in the open-source software FEATFLOW (www.featflow.de). Figure 12.18 shows snapshots of the concentration profiles of the extract (acetic acid). These results are compared with experimental results and are consistent with them. [Pg.339]

Solving the full Navier-Stokes equations in the channels requires a rigorous computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulation. During transient operation, such as start-up and shut-down, the flow fields can have a significant effect on the concentration and temperature profiles in the system. Under normal operation, it may be desirable to assume fuUy developed laminar flow to reduce the computational time and quickly estimate flow parameters based on fluid dynamics correlations. [Pg.738]

Vazquez, L., Alvarez-Gallegos, A., Sierra, F.Z. et al. (2010) Simulation of velocity profiles in a laboratory electrolyser using computational fluid dynamics. Electrochimica Acta, 55, 3437-3445. [Pg.110]

The National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL) developed a 3-dimensional computational fluid dynamics (CFD) model to allow stack developers to reduce time-consuming build-and-test efforts. As opposed to systems models, 3-dimensional CFD models can address critical issues such as temperature profiles and fuel utilization important considerations in fuel cell development. [Pg.83]

The other form of mathematical model is the more rigorous computational fluid dynamics (CFD) approach that solves the complete three-dimensional conservation equations. These methods have been applied with encouraging results (Britter, 1995 Lee et al. 1995). CFD solves approximations to the fundamental equations, with the approximations being principally contained within the turbulence models—the usual approach is to use the K-e theory. The CFD model is typically used to predict the wind velocity fields, with the results coupled to a more traditional dense gas model to obtain the concentration profiles (Lee et al., 1995). The problem with this approach is that substantial definition of the problem is required in order to start the CFD computation. This includes detailed initial wind speeds, terrain heights, structures, temperatures, etc. in 3-D space. The method requires moderate computer resources. [Pg.111]

Although they are increasingly popular, computational fluid dynamic (CFD) calculations are notoriously difficult to validate Model equations may be available to the user, but the source code is typically proprietary, experimental data for comparison may be impossible to obtain, and the sheer volume of data available from the simulations makes complete and meaningful validations extremely difficult. Velocity measurements are difficult. Pressure drop measurements are easy but insensitive to the details of the flow. The RTD is a more sensitive test, but it is not unique since the RTD is derived from a flow-averaged velocity profile... [Pg.17]


See other pages where Computational fluid dynamics profile is mentioned: [Pg.290]    [Pg.641]    [Pg.12]    [Pg.48]    [Pg.68]    [Pg.400]    [Pg.290]    [Pg.161]    [Pg.332]    [Pg.297]    [Pg.618]    [Pg.204]    [Pg.76]    [Pg.309]    [Pg.280]    [Pg.1128]    [Pg.186]    [Pg.26]    [Pg.221]    [Pg.672]    [Pg.238]    [Pg.50]    [Pg.57]    [Pg.934]    [Pg.167]    [Pg.304]    [Pg.45]    [Pg.82]    [Pg.447]    [Pg.669]    [Pg.2299]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.480 ]




SEARCH



Computation fluid dynamics

Computational fluid

Computational fluid dynamics

Dynamical Profiles

Fluid dynamics

Fluid profile

Profile, dynamic

© 2024 chempedia.info