Compound properties aqueous solubility

One of the most important properties of a plasticizer in the natural environment is its solubility in water. The greater the compound s aqueous solubility, the more likely that a plasticizer will dissolve into water, and become part of the hydrologic cycle. Water solubility can affect the extent of leaching of plastic products, and the movement and chemical fate of dissolved plasticizers in rivers, lakes, and groundwater, and in drinking water supplies. Aqueous solubility also determines the potential for removing vapor-phase plasticizers from the atmosphere through precipitation. 

Two approaches to quantify/fQ, i.e., to establish a quantitative relationship between the structural features of a compoimd and its properties, are described in this section quantitative structure-property relationships (QSPR) and linear free energy relationships (LFER) cf. Section 3.4.2.2). The LFER approach is important for historical reasons because it contributed the first attempt to predict the property of a compound from an analysis of its structure. LFERs can be established only for congeneric series of compounds, i.e., sets of compounds that share the same skeleton and only have variations in the substituents attached to this skeleton. As examples of a QSPR approach, currently available methods for the prediction of the octanol/water partition coefficient, log P, and of aqueous solubility, log S, of organic compoimds are described in Section 10.1.4 and Section 10.15, respectively. 

An extensive series of studies for the prediction of aqueous solubility has been reported in the literature, as summarized by Lipinski et al. [15] and jorgensen and Duffy [16]. These methods can be categorized into three types 1 correlation of solubility with experimentally determined physicochemical properties such as melting point and molecular volume 2) estimation of solubility by group contribution methods and 3) correlation of solubility with descriptors derived from the molecular structure by computational methods. The third approach has been proven to be particularly successful for the prediction of solubility because it does not need experimental descriptors and can therefore be applied to collections of virtual compounds also. 

The chemistry of hafnium has not received the same attention as that of titanium or zirconium, but it is clear that its behaviour follows that of zirconium very closely indeed with only minor differences in such properties as solubility and volatility being apparent in most of their compounds. The most important oxidation state in the chemistry of these elements is the group oxidation state of +4. This is too high to be ionic, but zirconium and hafnium, being larger, have oxides which are more basic than that of titanium and give rise to a more extensive and less-hydrolysed aqueous chemistry. In this oxidation state, particularly in the case of the dioxide and tetrachloride, titanium shows many similarities with tin which is of much the same size. A large... 

In 1868 two Scottish scientists, Crum Brown and Fraser [4] recognized that a relation exists between the physiological action of a substance and its chemical composition and constitution. That recognition was in effect the birth of the science that has come to be known as quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) studies a QSAR is a mathematical equation that relates a biological or other property to structural and/or physicochemical properties of a series of (usually) related compounds. Shortly afterwards, Richardson [5] showed that the narcotic effect of primary aliphatic alcohols varied with their molecular weight, and in 1893 Richet [6] observed that the toxicities of a variety of simple polar chemicals such as alcohols, ethers, and ketones were inversely correlated with their aqueous solubilities. Probably the best known of the very early work in the field was that of Overton [7] and Meyer [8], who found that the narcotic effect of simple chemicals increased with their oil-water partition coefficient and postulated that this reflected the partitioning of a chemical between the aqueous exobiophase and a lipophilic receptor. This, as it turned out, was most prescient, for about 70% of published QSARs contain a term relating to partition coefficient [9]. 

In the current era many medicinal chemists are unaware of the very important role of compound soUd state properties on aqueous solubility and therefore to oral absorption. In many organizations compound purification by crystallization has disappeared being replaced by automated reverse-phase HPLC purification. If medicinal chemists isolate a compound as a white powder from evaporation of... 

S. Prediction of aqueous solubility of organic compounds using a quantitative structure-property relationship. J. Pharm. Sd. 2002, 91,1838-1852. 

Garren, K. W., Pyter, R. A., Aqueous solubility properties of a dibasic peptide-like compound, Int. J. Pharm. 63, 167-172 (1990). 

The thermodynamic solubility of a drug is the concentration of the compound that is dissolved in aqueous solution in equilibrium with the undissolved amount, when measured at 25°C after an appropriate time period. Aqueous solubility has long been recognized as a key molecular property in pharmaceutical science. Drug delivery, transport and distribution phenomena depend on solubility thus, it is of considerable value to possess information of the solubility value of a drug candidate, to be able to predict the solubility for unknown compounds and, finally, to be able to modify the structure of a compound in order to modulate its solubility value in an appropriate manner. 

Wame, M., St. J., Connell, D. W., Hawker, D. W. (1990) Prediction of aqueous solubility and the octanol-water partition coefficient for lipophilic organic compounds using molecular descriptors and physicochemical properties. Chemosphere 16, 109-116. 

Molecules that possess both hydrophilic and hydrophobic structures may associate in aqueous media to form dynamic aggregates, commonly known as micelles. The properties of micellar structures have been discussed in great detail [66-69], but thejr main pharmaceutical application lies in their ability to provide enhanced solubility to compounds lacking sufficient aqueous solubility [70], The ability of a micelle to solubilize compounds of limited aqueous solubility can be understood from consideration of the schematic drawing of Fig. 10a. Above the critical micelle concentration, these molecules orient themselves with the polar ends in interfacing with the aqueous solution and the nonpolar ends at the interior. A hydrophobic core is formed at the interior of the micelle, and hydrophobic solute molecules enter and occupy this region. 

The most famous of these compounds is combretastatin A-4 (CA-4,7), isolated by Pettit et al. in 1989 [30]. Pettit s research led to the isolation and structural determination of a series of phenanthrenes, dihydrophenanthrene, stilbene, and bibenzyl compounds [31]. CA-4 (7), alongside CA-1 (8), was found to be an extremely active inhibitor of tubulin polymerization [30,32]. The major problems associated with these compounds were poor bioavailability and low aqueous solubility [33,34], and hence, research in the field was turned to designing better alternatives with the hope of eradicating the negative properties of these potent compounds. 

Measurements of aqueous solubility and partition coefficient between cellulose acetate and water were compared for thirty disperse dyes and an approximate inverse relationship was postulated [60]. This can only be valid to a limited extent, however, because the partition ratio also depends on the saturation solubility of the dye in cellulose acetate. This property varies from dye to dye and is not directly related to aqueous solubility. The solubilities of four dyes in a range of solvents were compared with their saturation values on cellulose acetate. Solubilities in benzene showed no significant correlation. With the other solvents the degree of correlation increased in the order ethanol < ethyl acetate < 20% aqueous diethylene glycol diacetate (CH3COOCH2CH2OCH2CH2OCOCH3). The last-named compound was suggested as a model with polar groups similar to those in cellulose acetate [86]. 

The solubility of the drug is affected by several physiological and physicochemical factors [26], Drug properties are defined not only by the chemical structure but also by the solid material, and a drug can potentially exist in many different solid state forms which may differ in solubility. Amorphous materials tend to show much higher aqueous solubility than crystalline forms of the same compound and different crystal modifications of the same compound may also have different solubility (e.g., [25]). 

Compounds with acceptable pharmaceutical properties, in addition to acceptable biological activity and safety profile, are considered "drug-like" or developable. Typical acceptable pharmaceutical properties for oral delivery of a drug-like molecule include sufficient aqueous solubility, permeability across biological membranes, satisfactory stability to... 

Aqueous solubility is probably the single most important biopharmaceutical property that pharmaceutical scientists are concerned with. It has been the subject of computational prediction for several years.20 23 The overall accuracy of the predicted values can be expected to be in the vicinity of 0.5 to 1.0 log units (a factor of 3 to 10) at best. Although a decision on acceptance or rejection of a particular compound cannot be made only on the basis of predicted parameters, these predictions may be helpful to direct chemical libraries with improved drug-like properties.24... 

---