Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Differential equation commutator

This result is inconsistent with the fact that the differential equation developed by Heaviside from Maxwell s original equations describe circular polarization. The root of the inconsistency is that U(l) gauge field theory is made to correspond with Maxwell-Heaviside theory by discarding the commutator Am x A(2). The neglect of the latter results in a reduction to absurdity, because if S3 vanishes, so does the zero order Stokes parameter ... [Pg.93]

It is noted that the complete Schrodinger equation is a second-order differential equation in the spatial coordinates and a first-order differential equation in the variable time. Therefore, it is not rigorously a wave equation (which would require a second derivative with respect to time). On the other hand, the variable time does not enter the equation as an observable but as a parameter to which well-defined values are attributed. Thus, there are no commutation relations involving a time operator. Nevertheless, it is possible to establish an indeterminacy relation involving energy and time, similar to those previously found for position and momentum. If At is the lifetime of a given state of the system, there will be an indeterminacy in the energy of such a state ... [Pg.30]

By analogy, preserving the order of matrix multiplication, which is not commutative, the solution to the following matrix differential equation for the CSTR startup response. [Pg.43]

For separable systems the Schrodinger equation, represented by a partial differential equation, is mapped onto uni-dimensional differential equations. The eigenvalues (separation constants) of each of the 3 uni-dimensional (in general n uni-dimensional) differential equations can be used to label the eigenfunctions (r) and hence serve as quantum numbers. Integrability of a n-dimensional Hamiltonian system requires the existence of n commuting observables O/, 1 i in involution ... [Pg.303]

The assumption of commutativity and independence with space and time of the system properties is necessary in order to have a single phase angle. The parallelism of the paths leads to the expression of the reversibility of the link between the two semienergies in terms of two symmetrical differential equations... [Pg.412]

This is a more general model than the classical one that assnmes linear system constitutive properties instead of operators, allowing one to find solntions for all variables as the model becomes a classical second-order differential equation. However, a higher degree of generality can be kept by merely assuming commutativity between the inductive damping operator and the temporal derivation. [Pg.573]

It turns out that one may present an exact integration of the equations for geodesics of the metrics (pahD on the group SL(m,C). Metrics of the type (pabD appeared for the first time in the course of construction of nonlinear differential equations integrable by the inverse scattering method. FVom the paper [38] it readily follows that the Euler equation X = [X,ipahD ) on a classical Lie algebra of series Afn-i serves as a commutativity equation for a pair of operators. [Pg.219]

These formulas completely determine the absorption spectrum. In the present case in its general form, the determination of the matrix elements of G is equivalent to solving the set of (2/ + l)(2/g + 1) differential equations of the Brown type The problem is complicated especially because the Hamiltonian does not commute with itself at different times. Because of the mathematical difficulties, approximate models have been used. [Pg.416]

When considering stochastic differential equations, there is an additional issue, best brought out by directly considering the E-field as a fluctuating quantity. Even for classical systems - replacing the commutator by a Poisson bracket, and considering p as phase space density - there are several interpretations possible of the equations and how to integrate them [32]. [Pg.245]

Because of the spherical symmetry of physical space, any realistic physical operator (such as the Schrodinger operator) must commute with the angular momentum operators. In other words, for any g e SO(3) and any f in the domain of the Schrodinger operator H we must have H o p(g ] = pig) o H, where p denotes the natural representation of 80(3 on L2(] 3 Exercise 8.15 we invite the reader to check that H does indeed commute with rotation. The commutation of H and the angular momentum operators is the infinitesimal version of the commutation with rotation i.e., we can obtain the former by differentiating the latter. More explicitly, we differentiate the equation... [Pg.266]

We wish to divide XT into a part describing the nuclear motion and a part describing the electronic motion in a fixed nuclear configuration, as far as possible. Equations (2.36) and (2.37) do not themselves represent such a separation because 3 is still a function of R,

partial differential operators with respect to these coordinates. The obvious way to remove the effects of nuclear motion from. >iel is by transforming from space-fixed axes to molecule-fixed axes gyrating with the nuclei. [Pg.45]

The two projection operators are chosen to be time-independent. Thus they commute with the differential operator on the left-hand side of Eq. (14). As a consequence, by applying to Eq. (14) both the operator P and the operator Q, and by applying the property p(t) (P I Q)p(t) = pj(t) + p2(t) as well, we split this equation into the following coupled equations... [Pg.365]

Equation 3 will now be differentiated with respect to V, holding T and X2.. Xm constant. In this case L is not constant, and differentiation of the first term BLX causes difficulty because L is a diagonal matrix and not a vector. This can be resolved by rewriting BLXJ as BX L, and now L is a vector. This special type of commutativity for the product of a diagonal matrix and a vector is used again in the product AVY and frequently in the derivations which follow. The derivative of Equation 3 by V gives,... [Pg.137]

The last important evolution of PrODHyS is the integration of a dynamic hybrid simulation kernel (Ferret et al., 2004 Olivier et al., 2006, 2007). Indeed, the nature of the studied phenomena involves a rigorous description of the continuous and discrete dynamic. The use of Differential and Algebraic Equations (DAE) systems seems obvious for the description of continuous aspects. Moreover the high sequential aspect of the considered systems justifies the use of Petri nets model. This is why the Object Differential Petri Nets (ODPN) formalism is used to describe the simulation model associated with each component. It combines in the same structure a set of DAE systems and high level Petri nets (defining the legal sequences of commutation between states) and has the ability to detect state and time events. More details about the formalism ODPN can be found in previous papers (Ferret et al., 2004). [Pg.412]

In order to treat the equation of motion in the same way, we apply the Reynolds decomposition procedure on the instantaneous velocity and pressure variables in (1.385) and average term by term. It can be shown by use of Leibnitz theorem that the operation of time averaging commutes with the operation of differentiating with respect to time when the limits of integration are constant [154, 106, 121, 15]). [Pg.135]

These commutation rules together with the rules for converting the Hamiltonian equations of motion into matrix form constitute matrix mechanics, which is a way of stating the laws of quantum mechanics which is entirely different from that which we have used in this book, although completely equivalent. The latter rules require a discussion of differentiation with respect to a matrix, into which we shall not enter.1... [Pg.420]

Equation (A-3) indicates that the partial differential operators commute when applied to a function with the proper continuity properties. [Pg.250]

Equation (D.4) is verified at once by differentiation of uf according to the product rule. The relations (D.3b) are satisfied trivially. Since F is an arbitrary (differentiable) function, we can consider the relations (D.3) as identities. We have thus shown that the representation (D.2) is equivalent to the commutator relations (D.3). [Pg.204]


See other pages where Differential equation commutator is mentioned: [Pg.450]    [Pg.346]    [Pg.40]    [Pg.40]    [Pg.578]    [Pg.180]    [Pg.647]    [Pg.343]    [Pg.303]    [Pg.297]    [Pg.310]    [Pg.329]    [Pg.330]    [Pg.115]    [Pg.356]    [Pg.110]    [Pg.80]    [Pg.255]    [Pg.312]    [Pg.165]    [Pg.192]    [Pg.128]    [Pg.84]    [Pg.195]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.329 ]




SEARCH



Commutability

Commutation

Commutativity

Commutator

Commute

© 2024 chempedia.info