Clomipramine studies/trials

The tricyclic antidepressant clomipramine also has been studied for PMDD. In placebo-controlled trials, both continuous daily dosing and luteal phase administration proved effective.17 Compared with the SSRIs, however, clomipramine has a less desirable side-effect profile with low tolerability. 

Tricyciic Antidepressants (TCAs). There has been surprisingly little study of TCAs in the treatment of social anxiety disorder. Early trials with imipramine and clomipramine suggested they might be beneficial however, subsequent controlled studies indicate that TCAs are no more effective than placebo. Consequently, they are not used to treat social anxiety disorder. 

This group includes compounds with actions on a range of neurotransmitter systems. Their antidepressant efficacy is mediated by reuptake inhibition of serotonin and noradrenaline, although side-effects such as sedation may also be useful. Their use in anxiety disorders is supported by a long history of clinical experience and a reasonable evidence base from controlled trials. Studies support the use of clomipramine (a potent serotonin reuptake inhibitor) in panic disorder and OCD (Lecrubier et al. 1997 Clomipramine Collaborative Study Group 1991), of imipramine in panic disorder and GAD (Cross-National Collaborative Panic Study 1992 Rickels et al. 1993), and of amitriptyline in PTSD (Davidson et al. 1993a). No controlled studies support the use of TCAs in social anxiety disorder. 

A potential limitation of most of the controlled studies discussed above relates to the numerous exclusion criteria used for patient selection. For example, in order to find homogenous samples, major depression, bipolar disorder, Tourette s disorder, psychosis (clomipramine, fluvoxamine and fluoxetine trials), primary psychiatric disorder other than OCD (clomipramine and sertraline trials), and attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), autism, or other developmental disorders (clomipramine and fluoxetine trials) were excluded. Thus it remains unknown how well these controlled studies will generalize to more naturalistic clinical populations that are highly comorbid and where exclusion criteria are not applied. 

In the Zito et al. study (2000), antidepressants were the second most commonly prescribed psychotropic medication. There are a total of 10 studies or case reports in the literature examining antidepressant use in preschool children (Table 49.4). None of the 10 studies are randomized, double-blind, or placebo-controlled trials. The ten uncontrolled studies looked at a total of 37 preschool children. Six of the studies looked at a total of 29 preschoolers with autism or childhood schizophrenia (Campbell et ah, 1971a Petti and Campbell, 1975 Holttum et ah, 1994 Sanchez et ah, 1996 DeLong et ah, 1998 Hollander et ah, 2000). While these six studies are difficult to compare, given the small sample sizes and the different treatment medications, these open-label studies suggest that clomipramine, venlafaxine, and fluoxetine may be helpful to reduce some psychiatric symptoms found in autistic... 

Based on some intriguing case reports (Jenike et al. 1983), a trial with a monoamine oxidase inhibitor (MAOI) may be an option in OCD patients who have comorbid panic disorder. In a double-blind trial, both phenelzine and clomipramine were found to be effective in reducing symptoms in OCD, as reflected on two of four OC measures [Vallejo et al. 1992). None of the patients in this study had panic disorder. This study suggests that MAOIs may be helpful in some patients with OCD even in the absence of panic disorder. However, in an earlier comparison trial, clomipramine, but not the MAOI clorgiline, resulted in significant reduction in OC symptoms [Insel et al. 1983b). Additional studies are needed to evaluate the place of MAOIs (including the newer reversible inhibitors of monoamine oxidase A [RIMAs], such as moclobemide) in the pharmacotherapy of OCD. 

Lecrubier Y, Judge R Long-term evaluation of paroxetine, clomipramine and placebo in panic disorder. Acta Psychiatr Scand 95 153-160, 1997 Lecrubier Y, Puech AJ, Azcona A, et al A randomized double-blind placebo-con-trolled study of tropisetron in the treatment of outpatients with generalized anxiety disorder. Psychopharmacology 112 129, 1993 Lecrubier Y, Pletan Y, Selles A, et al Clinical efficacy of milnacipran placebo-con-trolled trials. Int Chn Psychopharmacol 11 (suppl 4 29-34, 1996 Lecrubier Y, Bakker A, Dunbar G, et al A comparison of paroxetine, clomipramine and placebo in the treatment of panic disorder. Acta Psychiatr Scand 95 145-152, 1997... 

Treatment of GAD can be undertaken using a number of pharmacological agents. Benzodiazepines have been found to be superior to placebo in several studies and all benzodiazepines appear to be equally effective. However, side effects include sedation, psvchomotor impairment, amnesia and tolerance (Chapter 1). Recent clinical data indicate that SSRIs and SNRIs are effective in the treatment of acute GAD symptoms. Venlafaxine, paroxetine and imipramine have been shown to be effective antianxiety medications in placebo-controlled studies. Case studies also indicate the usefulness of clomipramine, nefazodone, mirtazapine, fluoxetine and fluvoxamine in GAD. Buspirone, a 5-HTla receptor partial agonist, has been shown to be effective in several placebo-controlled, double-blind trials (Roy-Byme and Cowley, 2002). Buspirone has a later onset of action than both benzodiazepines and SSRIs but with the advantage of being non-addictive and non-sedating. 

The meta-analysis of all studies comparing clomipramine or SRIs with placebo for the treatment of OCD found that the active drug produced a better result in every trial. We then calculated the effect size and the statistical significance for clomipramine alone and fluvoxamine alone. Their results showed a highly significant effect for both drugs (Table 13-10 and Table 13-11). There were also several studies with sertraline, fluoxetine, and paroxetine that demonstrated similar results (219, 220, 221, 222. 223,. 224, 225 and 226). 

In controlled trials, SRIs are better than placebo. All studies found these agents consistently and significantly more effective than standard antidepressants but each had a small sample size, and the results were not striking. Because of the consistency across studies, however, our meta-analysis with clomipramine was highly statistically significant. 

The ability of SSRIs to cause delayed ejaculation has been used in controlled trials of men with premature ejaculation (61,62). Of the SSRIs, paroxetine and sertraline produced the most benefit in terms of increase in time to ejaculation, but fluvoxamine did not differ from placebo. Clomipramine was more effective than the SSRIs but caused most adverse effects. From a practical point of view many patients might prefer to take medication for sexual dysfunction when needed rather than on a regular daily basis, and it would be of interest to study the beneficial effects of SSRIs on premature ejaculation when used in this way. 

The adverse effects of moclobemide have been well reported in several studies, mainly comparisons of moclobemide with standard antidepressants. The consensus has been that moclobemide prodnces fewer anticholinergic effects and less orthostatic hjrpotension and dizziness than clomipramine or imipramine. The main problems reported early on were insomnia, agitation, and paresthesia (3-9). The most common adverse effects in controlled trials have been insomnia and nausea (SEDA-18, 15). 

The bulk of literature examining antidepressant use in AD is made up of case reports and uncontrolled studies. Most of these report a favorable response to antidepressants, but several placebo-controlled trials have demonstrated mixed results. Of the antidepressants studied, citalopram, sertraline, clomipramine, and moclobe-mide (a monoamine oxidase inhibitor not marketed in the U.S.) were considered efficacious in at least one study but fluoxetine and imipramine were no better than placebo. It should be noted that citalopram and sertraline have both been studied in other placebo-controlled trials in this population with no difference over placebo. ... 

Results of low-dose risperidone (0.5 to 2 mg/day) added to antidepressant therapy in refractory patients are encouraging. Treatment response over 6 weeks was rapid and consistent. An additional 8-week, open-label study reported that 50% of patients previously unresponsive to clomipramine responded after risperidone 3 mg/day was added. The recommended initial dose of risperidone is 0.25 mg, and the target dose is 0.5 to 5 mg/day. Thirty-six patients unresponsive to antidepressants were given risperidone, up to 6 mg/day or placebo in a double-blind trial. Risperidone treatment resulted in a significant reduction in YBOCS scores. " In an open-label trial of olanzapine augmentation of SSRIs for 8 weeks, most patients experienced complete or partial remission in doses of 1.25 to 20 mg/day. ... 

A double-blind crossover trial in which clomipramine was directly compared to haloperidol and placebo in 36 autistic adolescents and adults failed to demonstrate any advantages of clomipramine over haloperidol with respect to Aberrant Behavior Checklist (ABC) measures of hyperactivity and irritability. Although no serious adverse effects were reported, tolerability of clomipramine was significantly worse than haloperidol, with over half of the subjects being unable to complete the clomipramine phase of the study due to adverse effects and/or lack of efficacy. An open-label sfudy also reporfed a high frequency of adverse effects (Sanchez et al.. 

---