Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Class II polymers

Geometrical and flexibility data pertaining to the same polymers are also given in Table 1, namely the persistence length and the average chain-to-chain interaxial distance D. The first five polymers in Table 1 have D values smaller than 6 A, unlike all the following polymers (i.e., no. 6 to 19 in Table 1, Class II). This is a consequence of the relatively bulky substituents carried by Class II polymer chains. For some of the polymers in Table 1 the C0o and P literature values are widely scattered or unavailable. In those cases lower-limit values of P from experimentally determined geometrical parameters, are predicted from our model by suitable interpolation and reported within parentheses. [Pg.109]

Class II - Polymer-silica hybrid by condensation (m=0) or co-condensation of functional precursors... [Pg.1268]

Class II polymers—random copolymers—fit less neatly into crystal lattices. Melting points are depressed, and the degree of crystallization is reduced. (A few special exceptions exist, in which the two monomer units are sufficiently matched in geometry that they can interchangeably occupy sites in a common lattice.) Because vitrification does not involve fitting into a crystal lattice, the glass temperatures of copolymers are not depressed by the chain irregularity. Consequently, random copolymers do not follow the T i(-Tg correlation characteristic of Class I polymers (3). [Pg.243]

Figure 13.1. Mackenzie s three models for Class II polymer/sol-gel composites. From left to right Model I, Model 2, and Model 3. Figure 13.1. Mackenzie s three models for Class II polymer/sol-gel composites. From left to right Model I, Model 2, and Model 3.
In the last section we examined some of the categories into which polymers can be classified. Various aspects of molecular structure were used as the basis for classification in that section. Next we shall consider the chemical reactions that produce the molecules as a basis for classification. The objective of this discussion is simply to provide some orientation and to introduce some typical polymers. For this purpose a number of polymers may be classified as either addition or condensation polymers. Each of these classes of polymers are discussed in detail in Part II of this book, specifically Chaps. 5 and 6 for condensation and addition, respectively. Even though these categories are based on the reactions which produce the polymers, it should not be inferred that only two types of polymerization reactions exist. We have to start somewhere, and these two important categories are the usual place to begin. [Pg.13]

The chemistry and technology of this class of polymer may be considered as an extension to those of the polysulphones, particularly insofar as there are strong parallels in preparative methods. The two polymer classes also have strong structural similarities with polysulphones containing the structure (I) and the polyetherketones the structure (II) of Figure 21.6. [Pg.602]

There is bound to be one problem with resin glass polyalkenoate cement. Because the matrix is a mixture of hydrogel salt and polymer, lightscattering is bound to be greater than in the conventional material. Moreover, the zinc oxide-containing glass of class II materials is bound to be opaque. This makes it difficult to formulate a translucent material and is the reason why their use is restricted to that of a liner or base. However, the class II material cited will be radio-opaque because it uses strontium and zinc, rather than calcium, in the glass. [Pg.175]

Within the past several years, we have examined the synthesis and reactions of several classes of polymers related to PECH. We have adopted three simple approaches to the preparation of polymeric substrates more reactive than PECH toward nucleophilic substitution. We have i). removed the 8-branch point by extension of the side chain, ii). replaced the chloride leaving group by a more reactive bromide and iii). replaced the backbone oxygen atom by a sulfur atom that offers substantial anchimeric assistance to nucleophilic... [Pg.60]

Fig. 7 Persistence length P is plotted vs. the chain diameter D both for polymers giving Class I and for polymers giving Class II mesophases. (From ref [11], see also Table 1). Reproduced with permission from [11]. Copyright 2004 Am Chem Soc... Fig. 7 Persistence length P is plotted vs. the chain diameter D both for polymers giving Class I and for polymers giving Class II mesophases. (From ref [11], see also Table 1). Reproduced with permission from [11]. Copyright 2004 Am Chem Soc...
The members of Class II in Table 1 present very small enthalpies of the mesophase-liquid transition [ AHml < 0.5 kJ/(mol of chain bonds)], suggesting that their mesophase is hardly stabilized by specific interatomic interactions. By contrast, we point out that in all cases the crystal-mesophase transition has a significant enthalpy value, mostly AHqm > 1 kJ/(mol of chain bonds). Consistent with their relatively flexible character, the polymers listed in the Tables have their glass transition below ambient temperature. [Pg.108]

Turning to polymers giving thermodynamically stable mesophases we must assume that, since we have described bundles as an inherent structural feature of undercooled polymer melts, such structures should occur, at least in principle, also in such systems, to the extent that attractive interchain interactions which account for bundle formation play a significant role. On the other hand, rigorously speaking Class II mesophases are entropy-stabilized and inter-chain... [Pg.110]

Poly(oxyethylene)-Si02 ormosils have been prepared as an approach to the preparation of biologically active polymer-apatite composites. For this purpose, Yamamoto et al. [72] obtained these Class II hybrids from triethoxysilyl-terminated poly(oxyethylene) (PEG) and TEOS by using the in situ sol-gel process. After being subjected to the biomimetic process to form the bone-like apatite layer, it was found that a dense apatite layer could be prepared on the hybrid materials, indicating that the silanol groups provide effective sites for CHA nucleation and growth. [Pg.380]

Covalent polymer networks or (Class II) crosslinked macromolecular architecture polymers rank among the largest molecules known. Their molecular weight is given by the macroscopic size of the object for instance, a car tire made of vulcanized rubber or a crosslinked layer of protective coating can be considered one crosslinked molecule. Such networks are usually called macronetworks. On the other hand, micronetworks have dimensions of several nanometers to several micrometers (e.g. siloxane cages or microgels). [Pg.113]

As an extension of the perspective of micelle formation by amphiphihc block copolymers the following part will focus on two other types of polymers. The micellar structures that will discussed are (i) micelles and inverse micelles based on a hyperbranched polymers and (ii) polysoaps, that are copolymers composed of hy-drophihc and amphiphihc or hydrophobic monomers. Whereas the first class of polymers is stiU very new and only few examples exist of the synthesis and appH-cation of such stracture in catalysis, the synthesis and aggregation characteristics of polysoaps has already been intensively discussed in the hterature. [Pg.294]

A class II aldolase-mimicking synthetic polymer was prepared by the molecular imprinting of a complex of cobalt (II) ion and either (lS,3S,4S)-3-benzoyl-l,7,7-trimethylbicyclo[2.2.1] heptan-2-one (4a) or (lR,3R,4R)-3-benzoyl-l,7,7-trimethylbicyclo[2.2.1]heptan-2-one (4b)... [Pg.254]

Drug absorption enhancers have been intensively studied over the past three decades [190— 192] in order to increase the oral availability of poorly absorbed drugs (BSC classes II-IV) [193,194]. Much attention has been paid to the synthesis and evaluation of new absorption enhancer molecules. Excluding the preparation of polymer drug conjugates less awareness was focused on the delivery rate of the molecules tested that is, the concomitant input of the poorly soluble drug together with its enhancer, so that maximal area of the small intestine would be exploited for absorption. The differences between the dimensions of the GI tract in... [Pg.27]


See other pages where Class II polymers is mentioned: [Pg.111]    [Pg.111]    [Pg.113]    [Pg.113]    [Pg.111]    [Pg.111]    [Pg.113]    [Pg.113]    [Pg.953]    [Pg.982]    [Pg.248]    [Pg.560]    [Pg.104]    [Pg.105]    [Pg.108]    [Pg.109]    [Pg.111]    [Pg.124]    [Pg.644]    [Pg.13]    [Pg.39]    [Pg.632]    [Pg.242]    [Pg.242]    [Pg.512]    [Pg.754]    [Pg.119]    [Pg.1568]    [Pg.153]    [Pg.215]    [Pg.77]    [Pg.106]    [Pg.107]    [Pg.110]   


SEARCH



II) Polymer

Polymers classes

© 2024 chempedia.info