Charge transfer, steric effects

The ortho effect may consist of several components. The normal electronic effect may receive contributions from inductive and resonance factors, just as with tneta and para substituents. There may also be a proximity or field electronic effect that operates directly between the substituent and the reaction site. In addition there may exist a true steric effect, as a result of the space-filling nature of the substituent (itself ultimately an electronic effect). Finally it is possible that non-covalent interactions, such as hydrogen bonding or charge transfer, may take place. The role of the solvent in both the initial state and the transition state may be different in the presence of ortho substitution. Many attempts have been made to separate these several effects. For example. Farthing and Nam defined an ortho substituent constant in the usual way by = log (K/K ) for the ionization of benzoic acids, postulating that includes both electronic and steric components. They assumed that the electronic portion of the ortho effect is identical to the para effect, writing CTe = o-p, and that the steric component is equal to the difference between the total effect and the electronic effect, or cts = cr — cte- They then used a multiple LFER to correlate data for orrAo-substituted reactants. 

Ketenes are especially reactive in [2 + 2] cycloadditions and an important reason is that they offer a low degree of steric interaction in the TS. Another reason is the electrophilic character of the ketene LUMO. As discussed in Section 10.4 of Part A, there is a large net charge transfer from the alkene to the ketene, with bond formation at the ketene sp carbon mnning ahead of that at the sp2 carbon. The stereoselectivity of ketene cycloadditions is the result of steric effects in the TS. Minimization of interaction between the substituents R and R leads to a cyclobutanone in which these substituents are cis, which is the stereochemistry usually observed in these reactions. 

The quantitative treatment of the electron-transfer paradigm in Scheme l by FERET (equation (104)) is restricted to the comparative study of a series of structurally related donors (or acceptors). Under these conditions, the reactivity differences due to electronic properties inherent to the donor (or acceptor) are the dominant factors in the charge-transfer assessment, and any differences due to steric effects are considered minor. Such a situation is sufficient to demonstrate the viability of the electron-transfer paradigm to a specific type of donor acceptor behavior (e.g. aromatic substitution, olefin addition, etc.). However, a more general consideration requires that any steric effect be directly addressed. 

The quantitative effects of steric encumbrance on the electron-transfer kinetics reinforce the notion that the inner-sphere character of the contact ion pair D+, A- is critical to the electron-transfer paradigm in Scheme 1. Charge-transfer bonding as established in the encounter complex (see above) is doubtless an important consideration in the quantitative treatment of the energetics. None the less, the successful application of the electron-transfer paradigm to the... 

The extent to which steric effects adversely affect the attainment of such intimate ion-pair structures would be reflected in an increase in the work term and concomitant diminution of the inner-sphere rate. This qualitative conclusion accords with the reactivity trend in Figure 16. However, Marcus theory does not provide a quantitative basis for evaluating the variation in the work term of such ion pairs. To obtain the latter we now turn to the Mulliken theory of charge transfer in which the energetics of ion-pair formation evolve directly, and provide quantitative informa-... 

The colours of these compounds are associated with charge-transfer transitions involving the dye moiety. Thus, when the steric and/or electronic effects of coordination cause variation in the energy of these transitions, then the induced spectral changes may be used to monitor complex formation. 

Wagnerova Class I intrazeolite photooxygenation, 233-253 of alkanes, 234—235 of alkenes, 235-243 regiochemistry, 236, 237, 243, 244 steric confinement effects, 237/ 246-247 Wagnerova Class II intrazeolite photooxygenation, 253-261 of alkanes, 256/ 258-259 of alkenes, 253-257, 253/ 256/ charge-transfer (CT) complexes in, 253-254, 255, 257... 

One aspect of asymmetric catalysis has become clear. Every part of the molecule seems to fulfill a role in the process, just as in enzymic catalysis. Whereas many of us have been used to simple acid or base catalysis, in which protonation or proton abstraction is the key step, bifunctional or even multifunctional catalysis is the rule in the processes discussed in this chapter.Thus it is not only the increase in nucleophilicity of the nucleophile by the quinine base (see Figures 6 and 19), nor only the increase in the electrophilicity of the electrophile caused by hydrogen bonding to the secondary alcohol function of the quinine, but also the many steric (i.e., van der Waals) interactions between the quinoline and quinuclidine portions of the molecule that exert the overall powerful guidance needed to effect high stereoselection. Important charge-transfer interactions between the quinoline portion of the molecule and aromatic substrates cannot be excluded. 

The selection of the solvent is based on the retention mechanism. The retention of analytes on stationary phase material is based on the physicochemical interactions. The molecular interactions in thin-layer chromatography have been extensively discussed, and are related to the solubility of solutes in the solvent. The solubility is explained as the sum of the London dispersion (van der Waals force for non-polar molecules), repulsion, Coulombic forces (compounds form a complex by ion-ion interaction, e.g. ionic crystals dissolve in solvents with a strong conductivity), dipole-dipole interactions, inductive effects, charge-transfer interactions, covalent bonding, hydrogen bonding, and ion-dipole interactions. The steric effect should be included in the above interactions in liquid chromatographic separation. 

Wheland RC (1976) Correlation of electrical conductivity in charge-transfer complexes with redox potentials, steric factors, and heavy atom effects. J Am Chem Soc 98 3926-3930... 

The desorption energy of the a - and a2-CO species was estimated to be 72 and 56 kJ mol respectively. The difference, 16 kJ mol can be ascribed to the electronic modification effect due to one oxygen atom, since the steric blocking is considered to be very small for both Mo. and Mo,. . This electronic effect is restricted to Mo atoms directly coordinated by 0(a) and can be explained in terms of the electrostatically-enhanced fiirough-metal charge transfer (13). 

---