Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Carbon surface, screen-printed

A wide variety of methods exist for the immobilisation of enzymes on a sensor surface. Screen-printed carbon electrodes are often the favourite base for these sensors due to their inexpensiveness and ease of mass production. Methods used for the construction of AChE-containing electrodes include simple adsorption from solution [22], entrapment within a photo-crosslinkable polymer [20,23], adsorption from solution onto microporous carbon and incorporation into a hydroxyethyl cellulose membrane [24], binding to a carbon electrode via Concanavalin A affinity [25,26] and entrapment within conducting electrodeposited polymers [27]. [Pg.313]

Figure 7.1 Label-free voltammetric detection of aptamer-protein interactions. (A) The electrochemical oxidation response from the guanine bases in the aptamer is observed at about 1 V (peak G) on the surface of the screen-printed electrodes. (The inset shows gold and carbon-based screen-printed electrodes with a three-electrode system.) (B) After the binding event with the target protein, an oxidation signal appears at about 0.6 V (peak P), and the oxidation signal of the aptamer decreases. Figure 7.1 Label-free voltammetric detection of aptamer-protein interactions. (A) The electrochemical oxidation response from the guanine bases in the aptamer is observed at about 1 V (peak G) on the surface of the screen-printed electrodes. (The inset shows gold and carbon-based screen-printed electrodes with a three-electrode system.) (B) After the binding event with the target protein, an oxidation signal appears at about 0.6 V (peak P), and the oxidation signal of the aptamer decreases.
In this work, simple (single-use) biosensors with a layer double stranded (ds) calf thymus DNA attached to the surface of screen-printed carbon electrode assembly have been prepared. The sensor efficiency was significantly improved using nanostructured films like carbon nanotubes, hydroxyapatite and montmorillonite in the polyvinylalcohol matrix. [Pg.297]

Boujtita et al. [11] Beer Alcohol oxidase (AOx) Screen-printed carbon electrode doped with 5% cobalt phthalocyanine (CoPC-SPCE), and coated with AOx a perm-selective membrane on the surface acts as a barrier to interferents/+400mV vs. Ag/AgCl Cobalt phthalocyanine... [Pg.266]

Stability of Prussian blue modified screen-printed electrodes The operational stability of all the PB-modified sensors is a critical point, especially at neutral and alkaline pH. A possible explanation for reduced stability could be the presence of hydroxyl ions at the electrode surface as a product of the H202 reduction. Hydroxyl ions are known to be able to break the Fe-CN-Fe bond, hence solubilising the PB [21]. An increased stability of PB at alkaline pH was first observed by our group after adopting a chemical deposition method for the modification of graphite particles with PB for the assembling of carbon paste electrodes [48]. [Pg.566]

This approach separates the steps relative to the immunoreaction from the step of electrochemical detection and for this reason the working electrode surface is easily accessible by enzymatic product, which diffuse onto bare electrode surface [28,33] (Fig. 25.3). Using this strategy, finding the optimum conditions for the immunoassay on the magnetic beads and for electrochemical detection on the transducer (carbon screen-printed electrodes) is much easier than in the usual one (electrode) surface systems, because optimum conditions for immunoassay do not conform with those for electrochemical detection and vice versa. [Pg.590]

Screen-printed electrodes manufactured with the use of carbon-containing ink were used, (i) Catalytic system was inserted into carbon ink prior to ink immobilization on polymer substrate (ii) catalyst or polymer matrix (nation), containing catalyst, was immobilized on the working surface of the transducer. Table 27.1 displays the results of urea determination with the application of catalytic systems inserted into ink or immobilized on the transducer by different techniques. Optimum results (minimum mean square deviation and maximum correlation between the introduced and determined concentrations) are... [Pg.651]

Vakurov et al. [46] evaluated a strategy to improve the covalent binding of AChE to screen-printed carbon electrodes modified with polyamines. To improve the extent of dialdehyde modification, electrodes were aminated. Initially, this was performed by electrochemical reduction of 4-nitrobenzenediazonium to a nitroaryl radical permitting attachment to the carbon surface subsequent reduction of the 4-nitrobenzene yielded a 4-aminobenzene-modified carbon surface. The obtained biosensors resulted in very sensitive devices measuring as low as 10 10 M of OPs. [Pg.692]

The objective is to describe a new non-enzymatic urea sensor based on catalytic chemical reaction. The sensor consists of screen-printed transducer (IVA, Ekaterinburg, Russia) and catalytic system which is immobilized on the transducer surface as a mixture with carbon ink. The sensor is used for measuring concentration of urea in blood serum, dialysis liquid. Detection limit is 0.007 mM, while the correlation coefficient is 0.99. Some analysis data of serum samples using the proposed sensor and urease-containing sensor (Vitros BUN/UREA Slide, Johnson Johnson Clinical Diagnostics, Inc.) are presented. [Pg.1212]

Electrode surface activation can be improved simply by electrochemical pretreatment. Determination of nitroaromatic compounds in water and soil spiked samples have been reported at electrochemically activated carbon-fiber microelectrodes. No interference was found from compounds such as hydrazine, phenolic compounds, carbamates, triazines or surfactants. The detection limit obtained can be approximately 0.03 iigml-1 for all the nitroaromatic compounds (Agui et al. 2005). Chen and coworkers reported an effective field-deployable tool for detecting nitroaromatic compounds with an electrochemically pre-anodized screen-printed carbon electrode (SPE) (Chen et al. 2006). [Pg.74]

Fig. 3.9 Surface morphology of screen-printed carbon electrode (after Chen et aL 2006)... Fig. 3.9 Surface morphology of screen-printed carbon electrode (after Chen et aL 2006)...
In an effort to develop a rapid and efficient scheme for immobilizing nucleic acids onto carbon screen-printed transducers, many authors took advantage of the strong adsorptive accumulation of these biomolecules at the screen-printed carbon surfaces. In particular, many of them reported that electrochemical adsorption (adsorption controlled by a positive potential) enhances the stability of the probe and this technique was preferentially chosen. [Pg.28]


See other pages where Carbon surface, screen-printed is mentioned: [Pg.114]    [Pg.131]    [Pg.114]    [Pg.250]    [Pg.302]    [Pg.2080]    [Pg.329]    [Pg.195]    [Pg.60]    [Pg.68]    [Pg.142]    [Pg.149]    [Pg.269]    [Pg.503]    [Pg.540]    [Pg.154]    [Pg.236]    [Pg.238]    [Pg.323]    [Pg.352]    [Pg.730]    [Pg.136]    [Pg.144]    [Pg.318]    [Pg.505]    [Pg.540]    [Pg.561]    [Pg.606]    [Pg.691]    [Pg.849]    [Pg.971]    [Pg.1187]    [Pg.1199]    [Pg.106]    [Pg.289]    [Pg.84]    [Pg.96]    [Pg.230]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.27 ]




SEARCH



Carbon prints

Carbon surfaces

Screen printing

Screened surfaces

Surface screen

© 2024 chempedia.info