Carbon nucleophiles aromatic nucleophilic substitution

The first three chapters discuss fundamental bonding theory, stereochemistry, and conformation, respectively. Chapter 4 discusses the means of study and description of reaction mechanisms. Chapter 9 focuses on aromaticity and aromatic stabilization and can be used at an earlier stage of a course if an instructor desires to do so. The other chapters discuss specific mechanistic types, including nucleophilic substitution, polar additions and eliminations, carbon acids and enolates, carbonyl chemistry, aromatic substitution, concerted reactions, free-radical reactions, and photochemistry. 

In general, the reaction between a phenol and an aldehyde is classified as an electrophilic aromatic substitution, though some researchers have classed it as a nucleophilic substitution (Sn2) on aldehyde [84]. These mechanisms are probably indistinguishable on the basis of kinetics, though the charge-dispersed sp carbon structure of phenate does not fit our normal concept of a good nucleophile. In phenol-formaldehyde resins, the observed hydroxymethylation kinetics are second-order, first-order in phenol and first-order in formaldehyde. 

How- does this reaction take place Although it appears superficially similar to the SN1 and S 2 nucleophilic substitution reactions of alkyl halides discussed in Chapter 11, it must be different because aryl halides are inert to both SN1 and Sj 2 conditions. S l reactions don t occur wdth aryl halides because dissociation of the halide is energetically unfavorable due to tire instability of the potential aryl cation product. S]sj2 reactions don t occur with aryl halides because the halo-substituted carbon of the aromatic ring is sterically shielded from backside approach. For a nucleophile to react with an aryl halide, it would have to approach directly through the aromatic ring and invert the stereochemistry of the aromatic ring carbon—a geometric impossibility. 

In Part 2 of this book, we shall be directly concerned with organic reactions and their mechanisms. The reactions have been classified into 10 chapters, based primarily on reaction type substitutions, additions to multiple bonds, eliminations, rearrangements, and oxidation-reduction reactions. Five chapters are devoted to substitutions these are classified on the basis of mechanism as well as substrate. Chapters 10 and 13 include nucleophilic substitutions at aliphatic and aromatic substrates, respectively, Chapters 12 and 11 deal with electrophilic substitutions at aliphatic and aromatic substrates, respectively. All free-radical substitutions are discussed in Chapter 14. Additions to multiple bonds are classified not according to mechanism, but according to the type of multiple bond. Additions to carbon-carbon multiple bonds are dealt with in Chapter 15 additions to other multiple bonds in Chapter 16. One chapter is devoted to each of the three remaining reaction types Chapter 17, eliminations Chapter 18, rearrangements Chapter 19, oxidation-reduction reactions. This last chapter covers only those oxidation-reduction reactions that could not be conveniently treated in any of the other categories (except for oxidative eliminations). 

In all cases, Y must have an unshared pair of electrons, so that all nucleophiles are Lewis bases. When Y is the solvent, the reaction is called solvolysis. Nucleophilic substitution at an aromatic carbon is considered in Chapter 13. 

All the mechanisms so far discussed take place at a saturated carbon atom. Nucleophilic substitution is also important at trigonal carbons, especially when the carbon is double bonded to an oxygen, a sulfur, or a nitrogen. Nucleophilic substitution at vinylic carbons is considered in the next section at aromatic carbons in Chapter 13. 

In any heterolytic reaction in which a new carbon-carbon bond is formed one carbon atoms attacks as a nucleophile and the other as an electrophile. The classification of a given reaction as nucleophilic or electrophilic is a matter of convention and is usually based on analogy. Although not discussed in this chapter, 11-12-11-28 and 12-14-12-19 are nucleophilic substitutions with respect to one reactant, though, following convention, we classify them with respect to the other. Similarly, all the reactions in this section (10-93-10-123) would be called electrophilic substitution (aromatic or aliphatic) if we were to consider the reagent as the substrate. 

In the reactions in this section, a new carbon-carbon bond is formed. With respect to the aromatic ring, they are electrophilic substitutions, because a positive species attacks the ring. We treat them in this manner because it is customary. However, with respect to the electrophile, most of these reactions are nucleophilic substitutions, and what was said in Chapter 10 is pertinent to them. 

Synthetically important substitutions of aromatic compounds can also be done by nucleophilic reagents. There are several general mechanism for substitution by nucleophiles. Unlike nucleophilic substitution at saturated carbon, aromatic nucleophilic substitution does not occur by a single-step mechanism. The broad mechanistic classes that can be recognized include addition-elimination, elimination-addition, and metal-catalyzed processes. (See Section 9.5 of Part A to review these mechanisms.) We first discuss diazonium ions, which can react by several mechanisms. Depending on the substitution pattern, aryl halides can react by either addition-elimination or elimination-addition. Aryl halides and sulfonates also react with nucleophiles by metal-catalyzed mechanisms and these are discussed in Section 11.3. 

He is, in contrast to H , a very poor leaving group indeed, with the result that in simple aromatic nucleophilic substitution ipso attack (cf. p. 161) is the rule rather than the exception. Cl , Bre, N2, S03, NR2, etc., are found to be among the more effective leaving groups and, with them, certain analogies to nucleophilic substitution at a saturated carbon atom (p. 77) may now be observed. 

Classical Michaelis-Arbuzov or Michaelis-Becker approaches toward formation of C-P bonds involving aromatic carbon sites are (understandably) not generally feasible. Nucleophilic substitution reactions on aromatic carbon proceed only under particular circumstances relating to the nature of attendant additional substituents, and then often with mechanisms quite different from those observed in... 

Since these methoxylated and acetoxylated sulfides have an acetal structure, it is expected that Lewis acid catalyzed demethoxylation should generate a carbocation intermediate which is stabilized by the neighboring sulfur atom. In fact, nucleophilic substitution with arenes has been successfully achieved as shown in Scheme 6.7 [43], This procedure is useful for the preparation of trifluoroethyl aromatics. As already mentioned, generation of carbocations bearing an a-trifluoromethyl group is difficult due to the strong electron-withdrawing effect. Therefore, this carbon-carbon bond formation reaction is remarkable from both mechanistic and synthetic aspects. 

Goumont et al. exploited this kind of reactivity for the nucleophilic substitution of the hydrogen atom in position 5 by carbon nuclophiles <20030BC2192> (Scheme 18). These authors reported that 6,8-dinitrotetrazolo[l,5- ]pyr-idine 11 easily reacts with potassium nitropropenide to yield an adduct similar to those obtained with alcohols 12. This adduct when oxidized by cerium ammonium nitrate yields the nitroalkyl-substituted aromatic compound 64. 

An S Ar (nucleophilic substitution at aromatic carbon atom) mechanism has been proposed for these reactions. Both nonenzymatic and enzymatic reactions that proceed via this mechanism typically exhibit inverse solvent kinetic isotope effects. This observation is in agreement with the example above since the thiolate form of glutathione plays the role of the nucleophile role in dehalogenation reactions. Thus values of solvent kinetic isotope effects obtained for the C13S mutant, which catalyzes only the initial steps of these reactions, do not agree with this mechanism. Rather, the observed normal solvent isotope effect supports a mechanism in which step(s) that have either no solvent kinetic isotope effect at all, or an inverse effect, and which occur after the elimination step, are kinetically significant and diminish the observed solvent kinetic isotope effect. 

Scheme 9, path d). An increasing number of alkyl substituents at the benzylic carbon (toluene 28.6%, ethyl benzene 50.5%, isopropylbenzene 46.7% [191]) and electrolytes of lower nucleophilicity (TBAOAc, HOAc [192]) favor side chain substitution. Table 13 presents some selected examples of aromatic nuclear substitution with different nucleophiles X or HX (Eq. 19). 

---