Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Values calculated

FORMAT (1 HI, 5X,61HMEASURED VALUES, CALCULATED VALUES, AND RESIDUAL IS (MEAS-CALC)//1X,2HNQ,6X,2HPM,7X,2HPC,7X,2 HDD,7X,2HTM,6X,2HTC,... [Pg.239]

MEASURED VALUES, CALCULATED VALUES, AND RESIDUALS (MEAS-CALC)... [Pg.276]

From downhole pressure drawdown and build-up surveys the reservoir permeability, the well productivity index and completion skin can be measured. Any deviation from previous measurements or from the theoretically calculated values should be investigated to determine whether the cause should be treated. [Pg.340]

Fig.7 shows the relation between the echo height F/B and the defect area s ratio Sr/So, when the ultrasonic wave is input from FCD500 side. This Sr/So is the ratio of the defect area Sr to the beam irradiational area So. Moreover, // X of (a) (b) (c) (d) are the value at the position where the echo height F/B is changed in Fig.5. And, the defect position of (i) (iv) in figure is shown the each position of Fig.3 respectively. Moreover, each curves are calculation values respectively, and this is described later. There has two case that F/T) of (a) (d) is changed by the defect position. The first case, F/B are increased as defect area s ratio Sr/So increases. The second case, F/B are increased after decrases as Sr/So increases. And defect area s ratio Sr/So to which F/B decreases is different according to the defect position... Fig.7 shows the relation between the echo height F/B and the defect area s ratio Sr/So, when the ultrasonic wave is input from FCD500 side. This Sr/So is the ratio of the defect area Sr to the beam irradiational area So. Moreover, // X of (a) (b) (c) (d) are the value at the position where the echo height F/B is changed in Fig.5. And, the defect position of (i) (iv) in figure is shown the each position of Fig.3 respectively. Moreover, each curves are calculation values respectively, and this is described later. There has two case that F/T) of (a) (d) is changed by the defect position. The first case, F/B are increased as defect area s ratio Sr/So increases. The second case, F/B are increased after decrases as Sr/So increases. And defect area s ratio Sr/So to which F/B decreases is different according to the defect position...
Each experimential values and the calculative values in Fig.7 and Fig.9 are almost corresponding except for the region of the echo height F/B rapidly decreases. This reason is thought that the experiment using a pulse wave but the calculative using a continuous wave. [Pg.838]

The Sa is the bonding interface area. And the calculative value is almost corresponding to the experimential value. This calculative value is described in consideration. [Pg.852]

The dotted line in Fig 4 is a calculative value of the echo height F/B on the contact surface of the materials. And this line obtains from the formula (1). [Pg.853]

Of the quantities shown in figure A2.4.8 is measurable, as is Sp, but the remainder are not and must be calculated. Values of 1-2 V have been obtained for although smaller values are found for the alkali metals. [Pg.588]

The scientific shidies of the early 1970s are fiill of concern whether the critical exponents detemiined experimentally, particularly those for fluids, could be reconciled with the calculated values, and at times it appeared that they could not be. However, not only were the theoretical values more uncertain (before RG calculations) than first believed, but also there were serious problems with the analysis of the experiments, in addition to those associated with the Wegner... [Pg.651]

Data on proton affiri itics (gas ph asc) of m any differen t com poti u ds (see Table 2) deni on strate Lh e h igh level of accuracy possible in determ in in g energies of related species. In th is report by Dew-ar and Dieter , the enthalpy of formation of II is the experimental value (367.2 kcal/moll. The calculated value for H is unreliable. [Pg.132]

A ll ide variety of thermodynamic properties can be calculated from compufer simulations a Comparison of experimental and calculated values for such properties is an important way in which the accuracy of the simulation and the underlying energy model can be quantified. Simulation methods also enable predictions to be made of the thermodynamic properties of V.stems for which there is no experimental data, or for which experimental data is difficult or impossible to obtain. Simulations can also provide structural information about the... [Pg.321]

Calculate V2(vjlr ) and add this value to the previously calculated value of the shear rate. [Pg.217]

After initial estimates of BE and SBE have been made, applieation to a larger set of test molecules suggests adjustments to bring about the smallest discrepancy between the experimental and calculated values of (or other selected... [Pg.145]

If you are running an updated version (V 8.0) of PC Model, click on force fields mm3. Omit this step for older versions. Click on Analyze (or compute depending on the version of PCMODEL) to obtain a menu of options. Select minimize. The geometry changes can be seen on the screen and a sequence of numbers appears in the right panel of the CRT screen, ending in Hf, the enthalpy of formation. This is the PCMODEL-MM3 calculated value of for cis-2-... [Pg.149]

If we compare the calculated total ionization potential, IP = 4.00 hartiees, with the experimental value, IP = 2.904 hartiees, the result is quite poor. The magnitude of the disaster is even more obvious if we subtract the known second ionization potential, IP2 = 2.00, from the total IP to find t c first ionization potential, IPi. The calculated value of IP2, the second step in reaction (8-21) is IP2 = Z /2 = 2.00, which is an exact result because the second ionization is a one-election problem. For the first step in reaction (8-21), IPi (calculated) = 2.00 and IPi(experimental) = 2.904 — 2.000 =. 904 hartiees, so the calculation is more than 100% in error. Clearly, we cannot ignore interelectronic repulsion. [Pg.236]

Continue the calculation in Exeivise 8-3 substituting 1.6 as the initial value of P, minimizing to find a new value of a. How much in error is the calculated value of the first ionization potential of He relative to the experimental value of 0.904 hartrees ... [Pg.239]

How many iterations does it take to achieve self-consistency for the helium problem treated (partially) in Exercises 8-3 and 8-4 What is the % discrepancy between the calculated value of the first ionization potential and the experimental value of 0.904 hartiees when the solution has been brought to self-consistency ... [Pg.260]

Substituting calculated values for each of these energies in the case of methane,... [Pg.314]

In the CNDO/2 approach as originally implemented, ab initio (orbital-level) calculated values of the energies mentioned below are used in determining the requisite parameters. In the later CNDO/S method, experimental values of these energies are employed. Briefly, in any CNDO method ... [Pg.614]

Further problems arise if measurements of the rate of nitration have been made at temperatures other than 25 °C under these circumstances two procedures are feasible. The first is discussed in 8.2.2 below. In the second the rate profile for the compound imder investigation is corrected to 25 °C by use of the Arrhenius parameters, and then further corrected for protonation to give the calculated value of logio/i fb. at 25 °C, and thus the calculated rate profile for the free base at 25 °C. The obvious disadvantage is the inaccuracy which arises from the Arrhenius extrapolation, and the fact that, as mentioned above, it is not always known which acidity functions are appropriate. [Pg.152]

The isomer proportions for the nitration of the chlorotoluenes, to be expected from the additivity principle, have been calculated from the partial rate factors for the nitration of toluene and chlorobenzene and compared with experimental results for nitration with nitric acid at o °C. The calculated values are indicated in brackets beside the experimental values on the following structural formulae. In general, it can be... [Pg.184]

III some cases, Ihe calculated values reported in this table are nol explicitly given in the referenced paper they were calculated by this author on Ihe basis of the published data. [Pg.29]


See other pages where Values calculated is mentioned: [Pg.218]    [Pg.206]    [Pg.836]    [Pg.838]    [Pg.851]    [Pg.851]    [Pg.852]    [Pg.854]    [Pg.907]    [Pg.586]    [Pg.707]    [Pg.438]    [Pg.21]    [Pg.236]    [Pg.248]    [Pg.294]    [Pg.715]    [Pg.62]    [Pg.21]    [Pg.114]    [Pg.252]    [Pg.15]    [Pg.1034]    [Pg.6]    [Pg.185]    [Pg.205]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.110 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.110 ]




SEARCH



A, values calculation

Acidic drugs calculated energy values

Aroma value, calculation

Bulk modulus calculated values

Calculated Conformational Energy Cutoff Values

Calculated F-values

Calculated t-values

Calculating MS match values

Calculating Membership Values

Calculating conductance values

Calculating the p-value

Calculation and numerical values of the photochemical primary quantum yields

Calculation of Expectation Values

Calculation of Forecasting Trend Value

Calculation of average values using the Maxwell distribution

Calculations of pH Values in Aqueous Solutions

Calorific value, calculation

Comparing Calculated and Experimental Values Throughout the Entire Operating Range of Packed Columns

Compressibility calculated values

Critical value calculation

Differences between calculated and measured values

Discount factors future value calculation using

Distribution coefficient values, 394 calculation

Distribution function calculation average value

Drugs calculating value

Endothermicity values, calculating

Epsilon values calculated for an isochron

Equilibrium constant calculating values

Equilibrium constant calculating values using

Exothermicity values, calculating

Extended-calculation values

Future Value Calculations

G values calculation

Higher heating value calculation

Intrinsic viscosity values, calculation

K Values, VLE, and Flash Calculations

K value calculation

Lattice energy calculated versus experimental values

Lattice energy calculated vs experimental values

Magnetic properties in DKH calculations of electronic g values

Mean values calculation

N values, calculation

Osmotic value calculation

PKa values calculated

PKa values calculation

Predicted-calculated response value

Present value, calculation

Property Values for Burning Rate Calculations

R „ values, calculation

Retention time calculation predicted values

Rf value, calculation

Separator conditions, 282 calculate values

Sterilizing value, calculation

Trajectory calculations boundary value formulation

Trajectory calculations initial value formulation

Transfer calculated values

Values Associated with Reactions - Equilibrium Calculations

Values of, from separator calculation

© 2024 chempedia.info