Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Predicted-calculated response value

A key feature of MFC is that future process behavior is predicted using a dynamic model and available measurements. The controller outputs are calculated so as to minimize the difference between the predicted process response and the desired response. At each sampling instant, the control calculations are repeated and the predictions updated based on current measurements. In typical industrial applications, the set point and target values for the MFC calculations are updated using on-hne optimization based on a steady-state model of the process. Constraints on the controlled and manipulated variables can be routinely included in both the MFC and optimization calculations. The extensive MFC literature includes survey articles (Garcia, Frett, and Morari, Automatica, 25, 335, 1989 Richalet, Automatica, 29, 1251, 1993) and books (Frett and Garcia, Fundamental Process Control, Butterworths, Stoneham, Massachusetts, 1988 Soeterboek, Predictive Control—A Unified Approach, Frentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1991). [Pg.739]

Table I lists the values of the rate coefficients used to simulate the transient response experiments shown in Figs. 3 through 8. These values were obtained in the following manner (29). Starting from a set of initial guesses, the values of k were varied systematically to obtain a fit between the predicted product responses and those obtained from experiments in which H2 was added suddenly to a flow of NO. These experiments while not described here were identical to that presented in Fig. 9, with the exception that only l NO was used. Because of the large number of parameters in the model, only a rough agreement could be achieved between experiment and theory even after 500 iterations of the optimization routine (30). The parameter values obtained at this point were now used to calculate the responses expected during the reduction of adsorbed NO. These computations produced responses similar to those observed experimentally (i.e., Fig. 3) but the appearance of the product peaks in time did not coincide with those observed. To correct for this, the values of kg, ky, and kg were adjusted in an empirical manner. Table I lists the values of the rate coefficients used to simulate the transient response experiments shown in Figs. 3 through 8. These values were obtained in the following manner (29). Starting from a set of initial guesses, the values of k were varied systematically to obtain a fit between the predicted product responses and those obtained from experiments in which H2 was added suddenly to a flow of NO. These experiments while not described here were identical to that presented in Fig. 9, with the exception that only l NO was used. Because of the large number of parameters in the model, only a rough agreement could be achieved between experiment and theory even after 500 iterations of the optimization routine (30). The parameter values obtained at this point were now used to calculate the responses expected during the reduction of adsorbed NO. These computations produced responses similar to those observed experimentally (i.e., Fig. 3) but the appearance of the product peaks in time did not coincide with those observed. To correct for this, the values of kg, ky, and kg were adjusted in an empirical manner.
From chromatographic theory [2] it is clear that the R value should result in simple models. For this reason it is preferred over, the k or the Rj. These latter response values can be calculated from predicted R values. It is more difficult to determine the error structure of the R . It is believed however that logarithmic transformation of the k values should result in homoscedastical error structures [3]. [Pg.249]

A check of lack of fit of the regression model (2.116), is done in accordance with the formulas from Sect. 2.4.3, where all design points are replicated the same number of times (r 25). The obtained predicted response values of the regression model are also given in Table 2.167. Variance of lack of fit is calculated thus ... [Pg.355]

In the fourth column of this table, we find the estimates of the maximum variance of prediction, calculated for each of the designs. For instance, the value d = 1.4 is the maximum variance of prediction for the design consisting of points 1 to 7, whereas the value d = 0.4446 corresponds to the design consisting of points 1 to 14. The confidence interval for the predicted value of the response is given by... [Pg.312]

Worked Example 10.1 shows how to calculate the Frank-Oseen free energy and use it to predict the response of a liquid crystal to a magnetic or electric field. Such calculations are used to design practical liquid-crystal display devices. They also can be used to determine the values of the elastic constants. [Pg.452]

Applications. CART is not generally established yet, and as a consequence, not many applications for electrophoretic or similar data in the pharmaceutical held are found. Put et al. (52) apphed CART in a quantitative structure-retention relationship context on a retention data set of 83 structurally diverse drugs, in order to predict chromatographic retention. There were 266 molecular descriptors calculated and used as explanatory variables (X matrix). The considered response (y) was the retention factor of the compounds, predicted for a pure aqueous mobile phase. The total sum of squares of the response values about the mean of the node was applied as impurity measure. From all descriptors, three were selected to describe and predict the retention, and four terminal nodes were obtained (Fig. 13.11b). Arbitrarily, the drugs were then divided into hve retention classes. Each terminal node was then labeled with either one or two class names. The regression tree thus becomes a classihcation tree. From CV, it was concluded that only 9% serious misclassihcations were observed. [Pg.310]

We would also want to use our knowledge of the response s dependence on the input variables to predict this response over the whole of the domain, and possibly also at its periphery. We have said response, but it is evident that we would usually mean responses, because we will usually be measuring a number of properties. Some of these are of vital importance as regards the product, others being less significant. The prediction may be carried out if there is a known mathematical model, generally empirical, for each response, which adequately represents changes in the response within the zone of interest. By "adequately" we mean that the value calculated with the mathematical model is sufficiently close to the value we would obtain if we were to do the experiment. [Pg.198]

Here we continue analysing the first design (2 factorial) using the first-order model to predict the response elsewhere in the domain as we have already indicated. Using the estimated values of the coefficients, we can calculate a response, in this case the solubility, at any point A in the domain by ... [Pg.206]

In our example, with the response values of Table 5.1 and the predictions given by Eq. (5.13), the ANOVA results in the numerical values presented in Table 5.3. Substituting into Eq. (5.17) the values calculated for SSr and SSt, we obtain... [Pg.212]

Once this eutoff has been found, we proeeed to find a more accurate estimation of the pitch using only the lower part of the signal. This is now possible as we are not attempting to pitch track noise. The amplitudes and phases are now foimd from Equation 14.5 as before, by minimising the error between the real and synthetic waveforms. This search can be performed in a number of ways Stylianou presents a fast technique for minimising Equation 14.5 directly [420], The noise component essentially has two parts h t) which describes the impulse response of the noise (which describes the spectrum of the noise envelope when transformed to the Frequency domain), and e t) which describes the sub-frame time evolution of the noise. For each fiame, h t) is found in a manner similar to linear prediction and e t) is estimated indirectly by calculating several values of h t) at shifted positions within the frame. [Pg.440]

Disadvantages. It is necessary to identify all factors likely to cause a change in the output variable and to describe the process by a model. The regulator must perform the calculations needed to predict the response of the output variable. The output variable being regulated is not used directly in the control algorithm If the control algorithm is not accurate and/or the cause of the deviation is not identified, then the process output variable will not be at the desired value. The accuracy and effectiveness of the control scheme are direcfly linked to the accuracy of the model used to describe the process. [Pg.700]

The term that seems to aflFect the sign of Km most strongly is dKPmJdrv,. This term is almost zero for valve trays, and for all valve-tray columns we have checked so far, the calculations predict inverse response over the entire range of normal operation. For sieve trays, dAPmJ tVr is small at low boilup rates and the calculations predict inverse response. This term increases rapidly with boilup, however [see equation (13.27)] and the calculations indicate that as increases, the column shows next neutral response, and finally, for large values of Wf, direct response. [Pg.323]


See other pages where Predicted-calculated response value is mentioned: [Pg.169]    [Pg.179]    [Pg.169]    [Pg.179]    [Pg.173]    [Pg.403]    [Pg.253]    [Pg.132]    [Pg.1118]    [Pg.563]    [Pg.99]    [Pg.94]    [Pg.329]    [Pg.644]    [Pg.379]    [Pg.140]    [Pg.297]    [Pg.301]    [Pg.562]    [Pg.227]    [Pg.314]    [Pg.41]    [Pg.617]    [Pg.168]    [Pg.329]    [Pg.331]    [Pg.248]    [Pg.67]    [Pg.14]    [Pg.125]    [Pg.18]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.169 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.169 ]




SEARCH



Calculated value

Predictions value

Predictive value

Responsivity prediction

© 2024 chempedia.info