Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Additivity principles

The phenomenon was established firmly by determining the rates of reaction in 68-3 % sulphuric acid and 61-05 % perchloric acid of a series of compounds which, from their behaviour in other reactions, and from predictions made using the additivity principle ( 9.2), might be expected to be very reactive in nitration. The second-order rate coefficients for nitration of these compounds, their rates relative to that of benzene and, where possible, an estimate of their expected relative rates are listed in table 2.6. [Pg.27]

The isomer proportions for the nitration of the chlorotoluenes, to be expected from the additivity principle, have been calculated from the partial rate factors for the nitration of toluene and chlorobenzene and compared with experimental results for nitration with nitric acid at o °C. The calculated values are indicated in brackets beside the experimental values on the following structural formulae. In general, it can be... [Pg.184]

The suggestion outlined above about the way in which through-conjugation influences the nitration of p-chloronitrobenzene is relevant to the observed reactivities (ortho > meta > para) of the isomeric chloronitrobenzenes. Application of the additivity principle to the... [Pg.186]

Table 17.5 Test of additivity principle with O2O7- and MnO mixtures at 440 nm... Table 17.5 Test of additivity principle with O2O7- and MnO mixtures at 440 nm...
The lack of steric hindrance is also shown by the kinetic data for p-xylene, mesitylene, and durene, the observed reactivities being close to those calculated by the additivity principle. The additivity principle has also been tested for the last seven compounds in Table 177, and for the first five of these it holds very well. If one assumes a value for/3Me0 of ca. 4.0 and takes the average of the values listed in the table for the methyl substituent partial rate factors, then the observed calculated reactivity ratios are 1.6, 0.85, 0.75, 1.4 and 1.0. For the last two compounds in the table the ratios are 5.3 and 4.1, the reason for this being unknown. [Pg.270]

Provided the additivity principle holds, the catalytic rate Vcat of reaction (3) at the surface should therefore be the same as the value Vmx predicted from the current-potential curves of the eouples involved. Moreover, the measured potential Eau of the catalyzed mixture should be... [Pg.2]

For the additivity principle to hold, steps (8) and (9), the anodic processes taking place under nitrogen, would be coupled only with the cathodic reduction of oxygen in step (11). It is step (10), the attack by the constituents of the oxygen couple on the intermediate Cu, which lies outside the scope of the principle and which explains the observed findings. [Pg.5]

Andersen et al. predicted that similar results would be expected for the corrosion of other multivalent metals oxidizing via lower oxidation states. They also pointed out that their interpretation was consistent with the kinetics of the corrosion of copper in oxygenated HCl solutions. Here the final product is Cu and thus there is no vulnerable intermediate. In consequence, the rate of copper dissolution from either Nj-saturated or 02-saturated HCl solutions was the same at a given potential in conformity with the additivity principle. [Pg.5]

The underlying problem in testing the validity of the additivity principle in corrosion, mineral extraction, and electroless plating is that the electrode metal itself forms part of one of the half-reactions involved, e.g., zinc in equation (5) and copper in equations (8) and (12). A much better test system is provided by the interaction of two couples at an inert metal electrode that does not form a chemical part of either couple. A good example is the heterogeneous catalysis by platinum or a similar inert metal of the reaction... [Pg.6]

Experiments by Freund and Spiro/ with the ferricyanide-iodide system showed that the additivity principle held within experimental error for both the catalytic rate and potential when the platinum disk had been anodically preconditioned, but not when it had been preconditioned cathodically. In the latter case the catalytic rate was ca 25% less than the value predicted from adding the current-potential curves of reactions (15) and (16). This difference in behavior was traced to the fact that iodide ions chemisorb only on reduced platinum surfaces. Small amounts of adsorbed iodide were found to decrease the currents of cathodic Fe(CN)6 voltam-mograms over a wide potential range. The presence of the iodine couple (16) therefore affected the electrochemical behavior of the hexacyanofer-rate (II, III) couple (15). [Pg.7]

The additivity principle was well obeyed on adding the voltammograms of the two redox couples involved even though the initially reduced platinum surface had become covered by a small number of underpotential-deposited mercury monolayers. With an initially anodized platinum disk the catalytic rates were much smaller, although the decrease was less if the Hg(I) solution had been added to the reaction vessel before the Ce(lV) solution. The reason was partial reduction by Hg(l) of the ox-ide/hydroxide layer, so partly converting the surface to the reduced state on which catalysis was greater. [Pg.8]

A Critique ofthe Additivity Principle for Mixed Couples 9... [Pg.9]

Although the original additivity principle of Wagner and Traud has been an immensely useful concept with applications in numerous fields, carefully designed studies in receiit years have revealed a number of exceptions. These have been described above and are summarized in... [Pg.9]

Summary of Recent Research to Test the Validity of the Wagner and Trand Additivity Principle... [Pg.10]

Speciality Polymer Additives Principles and Applications, A. Al-Malaika, A. Golovoy and C.A. Wilkie (Eds.), Blackwell Science, Oxford, 2001. ISBN-13 978-0632058976. [Pg.118]

Fig. 7.18 Plots of relative N-C(a)-C angle values (surfaces of differences, in degrees, relative to the values at < > = / = 180°) for the ( ), /-space of ALA. The top surface represents values directly calculated for ALA as a whole by HF/4-21G geometry optimizations the center surface represents simulated parameter values which were obtained using the conformational geometry function additivity principle as described in the text. The bottom surface is the difference, top minus center. All surfaces were plotted with the same scale factor, but offset by arbitrary and constant amounts for the sake of graphical clarity. The numerical values used to construct this Figure were taken from L. Schafer, M. Cao, M. Ramek, B. J. Teppen, S. Q. Newton, and K. Siam, J. Mol. Struct., in press. Fig. 7.18 Plots of relative N-C(a)-C angle values (surfaces of differences, in degrees, relative to the values at < > = / = 180°) for the ( ), /-space of ALA. The top surface represents values directly calculated for ALA as a whole by HF/4-21G geometry optimizations the center surface represents simulated parameter values which were obtained using the conformational geometry function additivity principle as described in the text. The bottom surface is the difference, top minus center. All surfaces were plotted with the same scale factor, but offset by arbitrary and constant amounts for the sake of graphical clarity. The numerical values used to construct this Figure were taken from L. Schafer, M. Cao, M. Ramek, B. J. Teppen, S. Q. Newton, and K. Siam, J. Mol. Struct., in press.
Molecular dynamics simulations are capable of addressing the self-assembly process at a rudimentary, but often impressive, level. These calculations can be used to study the secondary structure (and some tertiary structure) of large complex molecules. Present computers and codes can handle massive calculations but cannot eliminate concerns that boundary conditions may affect the result. Eventually, continued improvements in computer hardware will provide this added capacity in serial computers development of parallel computer codes is likely to accomplish the goal more quickly. In addition, the development of realistic, time-efficient potentials will accelerate the useful application of dynamic simulation to the self-assembly process. In addition, principles are needed to guide the selec-... [Pg.143]


See other pages where Additivity principles is mentioned: [Pg.514]    [Pg.184]    [Pg.187]    [Pg.239]    [Pg.1516]    [Pg.362]    [Pg.207]    [Pg.462]    [Pg.1]    [Pg.1]    [Pg.1]    [Pg.3]    [Pg.3]    [Pg.4]    [Pg.5]    [Pg.5]    [Pg.7]    [Pg.8]    [Pg.258]    [Pg.13]    [Pg.202]    [Pg.25]    [Pg.25]    [Pg.28]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.362 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.2 , Pg.3 , Pg.4 , Pg.5 , Pg.6 , Pg.7 , Pg.8 , Pg.9 , Pg.10 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.27 , Pg.189 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.23 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.5 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.29 ]




SEARCH



Additive pressure, principle

Additivity principle color matching

Additivity principle contributions

Additivity principle earlier tests

Additivity principle matching

Additivity principle recent research

Additivity principle studies

Conjugate addition basic principles

Copper, additivity principle

Corrosion additivity principle

Corrosion potential additivity principle

Current-potential curves Additivity principle

Electronegativity Additive Equalization Principle

Principle Additive

Principle Additive

Principle of additivity

Six Additional Brain-Disabling Principles

The Additivity Principle

© 2024 chempedia.info