Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Bulk properties experimental determination

In the last two decades experimental evidence has been gathered showing that the intrinsic properties of the electrolytes determine both bulk properties of the solution and the reactivity of the solutes at the electrodes. Examples covering various aspects of this field are given in Ref. [16]. Intrinsic properties may be described with the help of local structures caused by ion-ion, ion-solvent, and solvent-solvent interactions. An efficient description of the properties of electrolyte solutions up to salt concentrations significantly larger than 1 mol kg 1 is based on the chemical model of electrolytes. [Pg.465]

One of the most popular applications of molecular rotors is the quantitative determination of solvent viscosity (for some examples, see references [18, 23-27] and Sect. 5). Viscosity refers to a bulk property, but molecular rotors change their behavior under the influence of the solvent on the molecular scale. Most commonly, the diffusivity of a fluorophore is related to bulk viscosity through the Debye-Stokes-Einstein relationship where the diffusion constant D is inversely proportional to bulk viscosity rj. Established techniques such as fluorescent recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) and fluorescence anisotropy build on the diffusivity of a fluorophore. However, the relationship between diffusivity on a molecular scale and bulk viscosity is always an approximation, because it does not consider molecular-scale effects such as size differences between fluorophore and solvent, electrostatic interactions, hydrogen bond formation, or a possible anisotropy of the environment. Nonetheless, approaches exist to resolve this conflict between bulk viscosity and apparent microviscosity at the molecular scale. Forster and Hoffmann examined some triphenylamine dyes with TICT characteristics. These dyes are characterized by radiationless relaxation from the TICT state. Forster and Hoffmann found a power-law relationship between quantum yield and solvent viscosity both analytically and experimentally [28]. For a quantitative derivation of the power-law relationship, Forster and Hoffmann define the solvent s microfriction k by applying the Debye-Stokes-Einstein diffusion model (2)... [Pg.274]

The aforementioned macroscopic physical constants of solvents have usually been determined experimentally. However, various attempts have been made to calculate bulk properties of Hquids from pure theory. By means of quantum chemical methods, it is possible to calculate some thermodynamic properties e.g. molar heat capacities and viscosities) of simple molecular Hquids without specific solvent/solvent interactions [207]. A quantitative structure-property relationship treatment of normal boiling points, using the so-called CODESS A technique i.e. comprehensive descriptors for structural and statistical analysis), leads to a four-parameter equation with physically significant molecular descriptors, allowing rather accurate predictions of the normal boiling points of structurally diverse organic liquids [208]. Based solely on the molecular structure of solvent molecules, a non-empirical solvent polarity index, called the first-order valence molecular connectivity index, has been proposed [137]. These purely calculated solvent polarity parameters correlate fairly well with some corresponding physical properties of the solvents [137]. [Pg.69]

The convection heat transfer coefficient /i is not a property of the fluid. It is an experimentally determined parameter whose value depends on all the variables influencing convection such as the surface geometry, the nature of fluid motion, Ihe properties of the fluid, and the bulk fluid velocity. Typical values of h arc given in Table 1-5. [Pg.46]

The conductivity / is a characteristic property of the solution rather than a property of the cell used. It contains all the chemical information available from the measurement, such as concentration and mobilities of the ions present. Accordingly, the conductivity detector is a bulk property detector and, as such, it responds to all electrolytes present in the mobile phase as well as the solutes. Thus, the experimentally determined conductivity is the sum of the contributions from all ions pres-... [Pg.435]

The most traditional experimental determination of p is the electric field-induced second harmonic (EEISH) method, which requires the molecules to be aligned in solution by an electric field, by means of their static dipole moment (po). The EEISH signal is therefore proportional to po and to p <>c (projection of p on po), which is assumed to be equal to p in most cases. The bulk NLO properties are frequently evaluated as the efficiency of a powdered sample in second-harmonic generation (SHG), or as the d components of the x tensor. [Pg.352]

This calculation was performed using a set of material properties intended to be representative of the actual material behavior. Most of these properties were determined through direct experimental measurements made on bulk Ni and composite specimens, although some of the temperature dependent values that were not measured directly were estimated by extrapolation based on trends observed in literature data, as well as unpublished research. The notes provided along with Table I describe in detail the origin of these data. [Pg.390]

Theoretical studies suggest [32] that BN nanotubes should be semiconductors with a band gap of 5.5 eV lower than in bulk BN. This property is independent of tube diameter, chirality and the number of walls. However, recent ab intio calculations show that under polygonisation, BN nanotubes reduce their band gap to ca. 1.5 - 2 eV [ 168]. They also appear to be resistant to oxidation and may therefore find use in materials science. In fact, experimental determination of the Young s modulus in BN tubes (Y = 1.22 0.24 TPa) [169] confirms various theoretical elastic calculations on nanotubes [170-172] and reveals that BN tubes are highly crystalline and maybe the strongest insulating nanofibres [169,170]. [Pg.220]

While methods for studying these and other types of changes in the sample have become widely used, the most widely used methods are thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). As a group, thermal methods of analysis now constitute the most widely used experimental techniques in the chemical industry. A major reason for this widespread use is that determination of bulk properties, thermal stabdity, and characterization of materials are as important in industrial appHcations as are the determination of molecular properties. [Pg.267]

Two aspects determine the role of the solvent its bulk properties and its electron donor or acceptor abilities. The Debye-Hiickel theory which is valid at infinitely low concentrations, recognizes solvents only by their bulk properties, i.e. relative permittivity e, viscosity r, and density q. However, the Debye-Huckel range of validity is often experimentally unattainable (Ref. cf. also Figs. 4 and 6). The importance of bulk properties decreases with increasing electrolyte concentration. [Pg.38]

The properties of a water molecule in the gas phase are well studied experimentally [33, 45-47, 50] and theoretically [44, 51]. However, determining molecular properties of an individual molecule in the liquid phase is much more difficult because they will be altered by the fluctuating, locally inhomogenous environment created by the surrounding water molecules. Although neutron diffraction studies can tell us about the geometry [34, 35], comparisons of empirical water models with QM calculations of molecular properties of a water molecule in the liquid phase [52-55] in addition to experimental bulk properties are perhaps the best means of assessing how well the model represents a water molecule in the liquid phase. [Pg.312]

Table 1. Experimentally determined lattice constant and calculated properties of two possible configurations of ) i2AION3. Bo and fi are the bulk modulus and its pressure derivative, the cohesive energy per formula unit. Table 1. Experimentally determined lattice constant and calculated properties of two possible configurations of ) i2AION3. Bo and fi are the bulk modulus and its pressure derivative, the cohesive energy per formula unit.
Computer modeling of the kinetics of a reaction by solving rate equations is useful in the determination of mechanism and the estimation of rate parameters. Such analysis of kinetic data represents a higher-level approach to the problem of modeling than the molecular modeling discussed above. Here, we assume knowledge of the bulk properties of the system (the kinetic equations) and proceed to model the system comparing predictions to experimental measurements. [Pg.787]


See other pages where Bulk properties experimental determination is mentioned: [Pg.14]    [Pg.87]    [Pg.192]    [Pg.102]    [Pg.204]    [Pg.91]    [Pg.552]    [Pg.395]    [Pg.44]    [Pg.19]    [Pg.272]    [Pg.257]    [Pg.511]    [Pg.422]    [Pg.204]    [Pg.530]    [Pg.113]    [Pg.359]    [Pg.125]    [Pg.3]    [Pg.211]    [Pg.1284]    [Pg.264]    [Pg.309]    [Pg.270]    [Pg.806]    [Pg.1131]    [Pg.96]    [Pg.304]    [Pg.220]    [Pg.236]    [Pg.8]    [Pg.31]    [Pg.33]    [Pg.297]    [Pg.660]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.201 ]




SEARCH



Bulk properties

© 2024 chempedia.info