Bloom’s taxonomy

A content analysis of 11 general chemistry laboratory manuals was carried out by Domin (1999a) and concluded that the majority require the learners to operate predominantly at the three lower cognitive levels of Bloom s taxonomy (knowledge, comprehension and application), leaving out the three higher levels of analysis, synthesis and evaluation. 

Bloom s taxonomy is a classification of instructional objectives in a hierarchy. It is found quite useful in communicating the objectives of a chemistry lesson as also a criterion for evaluation of chemistry teaching. Under this scheme the specific objectives are classified as falling into the following three domains. 

Atherton, J. S. (2005). Learning and teaching Bloom s taxonomy. Available at http //www.leam-ingandteaching.info/leaming/bloomtax.htm. Accessed 27 Nov 2013. 

The final step in converting Syllabus topics into specific learning outcomes is to associate each topic phrase with a verb that best describes the level of proficiency determined by program stakeholders. Each level of Bloom s taxonomy can be expressed with specific verbs. For example. Synthesis in the cognitive domain includes such skills as formulate, create, construct, and reorganize. Table 3.7 gives... 

Table 3.7 Correspondence of proficiency rating sceile and Bloom s taxonomy...

Proficiency rating scale Bloom s taxonomy-cognitive domain Examples of learning outcomes based on the CDIO Syllabus... 

However, the term Bloom s taxonomy has entered educational discourse in relation to the work on the cognitive domain, whilst the companion work on the affective domain (Krathwohl, Bloom, Masia, 1968) is generally less well known or cited. 

To consider how the teacher should design learning activities to offer optimal challenge for the most able learners, it is useful to consider some ideas about the nature of intellectual development. Bloom s taxonomies (Bloom, 1968 Krathwohl, Bloom, Masia, 1968) can offer some guidance here, but especially when... 

Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning. Teaching and assessing A revision of Bloom s taxonomy of educational objectives. New York Longman. 

We have classified each chapter in accordance with Bloom s taxonomy (from 1 to 5) to guide the user regarding the relevance of each topic for this freshman course. In addition, we would like to emphasize that our main goal is to empower students to formulate problems (Chap. 5) and teach them material balance (Chaps. 7 and 8). Although the book is composed of 12 chapters, some of them could be disregarded at the instractor s discretion. Nevertheless, the key object remains to teach problem formulation and material balance as key aspects for freshman students, always keeping in mind the importance of... 

Learning objectives are commonly developed using Bloom s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives (Bloom 1956). In this case, each objective begins with a measurable, action-oriented verb corresponding to one of six levels of achievement in the cognitive domain (i.e. knowledge, comprehension, application, analysis, evaluation, and synthesis). Example action verbs are listed in Table 1 for each of the six achievement levels. These verbs can readily be observed and measured if incorporated into an assessment plan. In contrast, verbs such as understand , know , and appreciate are difficult to measure and should be avoided in the development of learning objectives. 

As an additional note, we argue that case histories cannot be considered to be the solution to all learning needs. One reason is that only low-level learning outcomes (in terms of Bloom s taxonomy) can be obtained unless a significant portion of the course is devoted to... 

The BOK2 (ASCE, 2008) report, on the other hand, lists Experiments as one of the 24 desirable competencies of Civil Engineers, to be developed by undergraduate curricula to level of achievement 4 of Bloom s taxonomy (Bloom et al, 1956). Level 4 (Analysis) refers to the ability to break down material into its component parts, so that its organizational structure may be understood . JTC3 of FedIGS suggests, as a... 

Anderson, L.W., and D. Krathwohl (Eds.). 2001. A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching and Assessing a Revision of Bloom s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Longman, New York. 

Bloom s taxonomy was identified as a suitable intersection point for engineering and education. In order to make educational methods more approachable to engineers, it was suggested to draw... 

The result was a reduction in the amount of objectives from 23 detailed foundational ones that skimmed the surface and touched on numerous topics to 8 significant learning objectives that delve deeper into fewer focus areas of the same general topics and force students to work at the highest levels of Bloom s taxonomy. The focus of the course then becomes a significant and intentional learning experience from which students can emerge more self-reliant and self-aware. 

Keywords Program outcomes Bloom s taxonomy design Delivery methods Student feedback... 

The automotive electronics is of three aedits with 42 h of teaching. Assessment techniques involve the continuous internal evaluation (CIE) and semester-end evaluation (SEE). CIE involves minor exams and course project with weightages of 80 % and 20 %, respectively. The questions of minor/semester-end examinations have been framed to cater to the learning levels of Bloom s taxonomy. The course along with the delivery and evaluation methods addresses both the technical and professional outcomes of the program. 

---