Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Blends crosslink density

Table III shows the result of SANS analysis on fully polymerized PB/PS IPN s, seml-IPN s, and chemical blends by Fernandez et al. [ n.] The specific interfacial surface area was shown to increase with Increasing crosslink density, S decreasing in the order full-IPN s, semi-I IPN s, seml-II IPN s afid chemical blends, as expected from many earlier studies. Its value ranges from 20 to 200 m /gm, in the range of true colloids. This result is particularly important because interfacial surface area is closely related to toughness and impact strength. Table III shows the result of SANS analysis on fully polymerized PB/PS IPN s, seml-IPN s, and chemical blends by Fernandez et al. [ n.] The specific interfacial surface area was shown to increase with Increasing crosslink density, S decreasing in the order full-IPN s, semi-I IPN s, seml-II IPN s afid chemical blends, as expected from many earlier studies. Its value ranges from 20 to 200 m /gm, in the range of true colloids. This result is particularly important because interfacial surface area is closely related to toughness and impact strength.
Fig. 26 Apparent crosslink density (1/6) of S-SBR/EPDM blends with untreated silica, PA-, PPy-, and PTh-silicas, and silane-modified silica... Fig. 26 Apparent crosslink density (1/6) of S-SBR/EPDM blends with untreated silica, PA-, PPy-, and PTh-silicas, and silane-modified silica...
The system Cl-butyl-cis-polybutadiene has been studied in some detail because it was suitable for the developed differential swelling technique and because this system of blends vulcanized with zinc oxide, sulfur, and thiuram disulfide first revealed the presence of interfacial bonds. This curative system has the feature of a flat cure —i.e.y the two homophases are vulcanized rapidly, and the crosslinked density does not increase radically as vulcanization time is prolonged. This is observed in Table IV by swelling and extractable levels of a series of crosslinked networks cured at increasing times and swollen in a common solvent, cyclohexane. [Pg.90]

The distribution of crosslinks in blends of different rubbers has been determined by means of line-width analysis of H high-resolution NMR spectra obtained using swollen samples [33,160-166]. It should be noted that the results of these experiments suffer from systematic errors, since the line width of the NMR spectra is affected not only by the crosslink density, but also by differences in the magnetic susceptibility of the different phases [79-83] and even by the effects of slow sample rotation [20]. [Pg.385]

The presence of carbon black filler increases the linewidths in the spectra from both phases of a blend, and as a result comparison could only be made of the relative crosslink density [102]. Later the authors showed that H% in the presence of filler in blends of NR and EPDM was linearly related to H% in the unfilled blend [103]. In blends of NR and BR a small excess of the sulfur reacted in the NR phase compared with the BR. Measurement in unfilled blends allowed crosslink densities to be determined, and confirmed the greater yield of crosslinking in the NR, is shown in a plot of H% against crosslink density [104]. [Pg.507]

Separate work on a Fourier transform (FT) NMR spectrometer revealed the presence of two peaks from the solvents from both within and outside the swollen gel [104], See below for a discussion of the origin of the NMR linewidths. The chemical shift of the olefinic peaks was found to shift down field with increasing crosslink density, and hence a modified method for determining H% was introduced. In this paper they also introduced the first 13C NMR measurements of swollen rubber blends, and again found a systematic increase in linewidth with increasing crosslink density. The higher resolution in the 13C spectrum compared with NMR allows the potential of more detailed information on rubber mixtures. [Pg.508]

Monofunctional epoxy diluents are used primarily with DGEBA epoxy blends. The most common monofunctional diluents are butyl glycidyl ether and phenyl glycidyl ether. The effect of butyl glycidyl ether and other reactive diluents on the viscosity of epoxy resin is shown in Fig. 6.3. Because the monofunctional diluents reduce crosslink density, they are used at relatively low levels to avoid degrading heat and chemical resistance or other properties of the adhesive. [Pg.120]

Di- or polyfunctional epoxy resins may be considered reactive diluents that provide a degree of resiliency, yet most preserve the inherent properties of the base epoxy resin. When added to an epoxy formulation, they will not reduce functionality, and in some cases an actual increase in crosslink density is noticed. Typical resins of these types are shown in Fig. 8.4. As flexibilizers, these diluents are often blended with the more reactive epoxy resins. They, of course, can also be used as epoxy resins in themselves. [Pg.143]

Solvent addition or blending the epoxy resin with low-molecular-weight diluents is another method of lowering the viscosity so that fillers can be efficiently added to the epoxy adhesive formulation. However, in these cases the formulator must address the high vapor pressures of the solvent or diluent (as well as various health, safety, and environmental issues). In the case of diluent addition, the reduction in crosslinking density and thermal or... [Pg.158]

Precrosslinked particles with low crosslink density exhibit elastic properties and ean be applied for toughening thermoplastics or thermosets. The size of the elastic domains in blends consisting of elastic particles and a polymer matrix can be adjusted precisely, provided that the particles are dispersible. Via functional groups, microparticles can be covalently attaehed to a (thermoset) matrix. The grafting of polymer shells onto elastic microparticles improves the compatibility with the polymer matrix to be modified [3]. Thus, after processing of the polymer alloy discrete elastic particles can be observed as disperse phase in a continuous thermoplastic matrix. [Pg.674]

The formation of keto-phosphonate structure within macromolecule leads to the removal of internal unsaturation. Triallyl cyanurate and ionizing irradiations [210] made a E-P block copolymer-PE blend thermally stable. Triallyl cyanurate increases the crosslinking density probably due to addition reactions between polymeric and allyl radicals produced by ionizing radiation. The addition of 2,2,4-trimethyl-l,2-di-hydroquinoline and bis[4(l-methyl-1-phenylethyl)pheny 1]-amine stabilized a PE-EPDM blend against heat [211]. Popov et al. [212] studied the ozone effect on PE-iPP blend. The oxidation rate was detected in relation to... [Pg.207]

Fig. 9. Plot of the true suain ratio in craze and deformation zones showing the transition from crazing to shear deformation as a function of network strand (entangled + crosslinked) density v. The open squares and open diamonds represent uncrossiinked homopolymers and copolymers, the open triangles and hexagons represent uncrossiinked blends of PS and PPO and the filled triangles and circles represent crosslinked PS (After Ref. courtesy of J. Polym. Sd.-Polym. Phys. (Wiley))... Fig. 9. Plot of the true suain ratio in craze and deformation zones showing the transition from crazing to shear deformation as a function of network strand (entangled + crosslinked) density v. The open squares and open diamonds represent uncrossiinked homopolymers and copolymers, the open triangles and hexagons represent uncrossiinked blends of PS and PPO and the filled triangles and circles represent crosslinked PS (After Ref. courtesy of J. Polym. Sd.-Polym. Phys. (Wiley))...
Figure 5. Gel fractions and crosslink densities for copolymers and blends... Figure 5. Gel fractions and crosslink densities for copolymers and blends...
Kamel (21) at Drexel University has been developing a bone restorative using an alumina- poly(acrylic acid) composite produced by exposing an aqueous mixture of the blend to y radiation of 1 MRad (Figure 8). The porosity and crosslink density of the system were varied over wide ranges by varying monomer concentration and a heat treatment step to form anhydrides. [Pg.399]

One of the major drawbacks of BMI resins is their extreme brittleness, which is a result of high crosslink density and absence of flexible spacers. Several different approaches have been adopted to alleviate this problem, including copolymerization with a range of monomers, or blending with thermoplastic or elastomeric polymers [14-19]. [Pg.470]

Using well-known relationships for swollen gels (3), we computed "apparent crosslink densities" from the gel swell ratios and the solvent-polymer interaction parameter determined from the temperature dependence of those ratios (4) With lower ABP concentrations, the gels produced from the blends were fragile, leading to appreciable experimental uncertainties. With the higher ABP concentrations, more meaningful information was obtained. [Pg.89]

In comparison experiments, we used two samples, each with 1.2 wt ABP - oneanE/ABP copolymer and the other an E//E/ABP blend. Due to the sample thickness (2 mils) and the high ABP concentration, nearly 100 of the incident radiation was absorbed by the samples in the initial part of the reaction. The samples were irradiated for various periods and the gel fractions and crosslink densities determined. These data are tabulated in Table IV and plotted in Figure 5. [Pg.89]


See other pages where Blends crosslink density is mentioned: [Pg.566]    [Pg.468]    [Pg.314]    [Pg.184]    [Pg.164]    [Pg.42]    [Pg.163]    [Pg.146]    [Pg.149]    [Pg.207]    [Pg.220]    [Pg.228]    [Pg.172]    [Pg.444]    [Pg.446]    [Pg.446]    [Pg.493]    [Pg.506]    [Pg.508]    [Pg.306]    [Pg.76]    [Pg.83]    [Pg.342]    [Pg.359]    [Pg.137]    [Pg.192]    [Pg.19]    [Pg.57]    [Pg.64]    [Pg.69]    [Pg.141]    [Pg.82]    [Pg.89]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.502 , Pg.503 , Pg.504 , Pg.505 , Pg.506 , Pg.507 , Pg.508 , Pg.509 ]




SEARCH



Crosslink density

Crosslinking blends

Crosslinking crosslink density

© 2024 chempedia.info