Bioindicators, using

Bioassays used in analytical practice can be classified according to the type of bioindicators used in a given toxicity test. The organisms most frequently used are bacteria, plants, and animals detailed information on their application in bioassays to assess environmental pollution is given in a review study.20 In this chapter, we present tables for the use of selected bioindicators in toxicity tests. 

Wildlife indicators of mercury exposure and trends are important elements of a comprehensive approach to assess mercury in the environment and the monitoring of trends that may assist regulators and the regulated community in long-term evalnation of the need and usefulness of mercury somce controls. It is important to understand, however, that bioindicator data alone are insufficient to answer snch critical qnestions as identification of mercniy sonrces, or the relative importance of local, regional, and global inputs of mercury somces to atmospheric deposition and errvirorrmerrtal loading in specific areas. 

Both the development and application of bioindicators present a number of methodological considerations. One key requirement is to relate dose/effects studies in the laboratory, and residne levels/efifects studies in the field. For many years, these stndies were condncted by different groups of scientists, and the cotmections were not made (Eisler 1987). Ideally, we should use bioindicators where there are clear links between exposnre levels, tissue levels, and effects (Burger and Gochfeld 2003). The most nseful bioindicators of those we suggest are those where the cotmections have been clearly made. 

Yuska DE, Skelly JM, Ferdinand JA, Stevenson RE, Savage JE, Mulik JD, Etines A. 2003. Use of bioindicators and passive sampling devices to evaluate ambient ozone concentrations in north central Pennsylvania. Environ Pollut 125 71-80. 

Chassard-Bouchaud C. 1996. Analytical microscopy and environment. Current developments using bioindicators of pollution by stable and radioactive elements. Cell Mol Biol 42(3) 361-383. 

Exposure. Few studies were found regarding the measurement of diisopropyl methylphosphonate or its metabolites as indicators of exposure. IMPA in urine or plasma has been suggested as a biomarker of acute exposure. It would be useful to more fully explore urinary excretion of IMPA to determine dose relationships and its utility as a bioindicator of diisopropyl methylphosphonate exposure. 

A rapid, nondestructive method based on determination of the spatial distribution of ATP, as a potential bioindicator of microbial presence and activity on monuments, artworks, and other samples related to the cultural heritage, was developed [57], After cell lysis, ATP was detected using the bioluminescent firefly luciferin-luciferase system and the method was tested on different kinds of surfaces and matrices. Figure 3 reports the localization of biodeteriogen agents on a marble specimen. Sample geometry is a critical point especially when a quantitative analysis has to be performed however, the developed method showed that with opti-... 

The use of SPMDs to sequester hydrophobic contaminants for incorporation into bioindicator test-based screening is increasing in both frequency of application and in the array of modes of action. Eor example, as a focused part of a broader... 

Petty, J.D. Jones, S.B. Huckins, J.N. Cranor, W.L. Parris, J.T. McTague, T.B. Boyle, TP. 2000, An approach for assessment of water quality using semipermeable membrane devices (SPMDs) and bioindicator tests. Chemosphere 41 311—321. 

Bioindicators of effect in the field such as intersex index (ISI) and population decline in gastropods are useful to reveal causal relationships between the exposure to toxic compounds and population effects on local marine organisms. When these effects correspond to the effects predicted based on bioassays in the laboratory, for example expressed as PAF of species, these field effects in gastropods, can be used as a bioindicator for the local ecotoxicological health status. 

To validate the predicted risk, the actual impact of dumped harbour sediments on local ecosystems can be determined using a dedicated set of in vitro and in vivo bioassays as well as bioindicators selected based on the information obtained from the hazard and risk assessment and on the characteristics of the local ecosystem. 

Klumpp, A., Hintemann, T., Santana Lima, J. and Kandeler, E. (2003) Bioindication of air pollution effects near a copper smelter in Brazil using mango trees and soil microbiological properties. Environmental Pollution, 126(3), 313-21. 

Environmental Cancer Risk, Nutrition, and Individual Susceptibility (ECNIS) Studying use of biomarkers of exposure and susceptibility and bioindicators of disease in molecular epidemiology of cancer (ECNIS 2005). 

---