Binding-Inhibition assay

Figure 11. Comparison of different assay types using a direct detection scheme were the receptors immobilized to the surface and the analyte is recognized at the surface (direct optical detection and using labelled systems), a competitive test scheme were labelled analyte molecules compete with the non-labelled sample, and thirdly a binding inhibition assay were analyte derivatives (ligand derivatives) are immobilized at the surface, in a preincubation phase the ligands block receptor molecules, non-blocked receptors go to the surface being either labelled or optically detected.

A typical example of such parallelized measurements is given in Figure 20. For a variety of inhibitors, the binding inhibition assay is given for a thrombin inhibition Figure 20 shows the binding curves obtained in parallel from 96 wells37. 

Figure 21. By combinatorial chemistry, 21 15-mer-peptides are synthesized, each shifted by one position of the aminoacid. In binding inhibition assay, an epitope mapping of the antibody is achieved.

Figure 4 Competitive binding inhibition assay—labelled antigen. (A) Antigen bound to microtitre plates. (B) Reaction in solution before separation of bound and free labelled antigen.

Probably all adenylyl cyclases are inhibited competitively by substrate analogs, which bind at the site and to the enzyme configuration with which cation-ATP binds (cf Fig. 4). One of the best competitive inhibitors is (3-L-2, 3 -dideoxy adenosine-5 -triphosphate ( 3-L-2, 3 -dd-5 -ATP Table 4) [4], which allowed the identification of the two metal sites within the catalytic active site (cf Fig. 4) [3]. This ligand has also been labeled with 32P in the (3-phosphate and is a useful ligand for reversible, binding displacement assays of adenylyl cyclases [4]. The two inhibitors, 2, 5 -dd-3 -ATP and 3-L-2, 3 -dd-5 -ATP, are comparably potent... 

The hallmark of slow binding inhibition is that the degree of inhibition at a fixed concentration of compound will vary over time, as equilibrium is slowly established between the free and enzyme-bound forms of the compound. Often the establishment of enzyme-inhibitor equilibrium is manifested over the time course of the enzyme activity assay, and this leads to a curvature of the reaction progress curve over a time scale where the uninhibited reaction progress curve is linear. We saw... 

In this chapter we consider the situation where this assumption is no longer valid, because the affinity of the inhibitor for its target enzyme is so great that the value of K w approaches the total concentration of enzyme ( / T) in the assay system. This situation is referred to as tight binding inhibition, and it presents some unique challenges for quantitative assessment of inhibitor potency and for correct assessment of inhibitor SAR. 

Direct detection is usually preferred in applications, where direct binding of analyte of concentrations of interest produces a sufficient response. If necessary, the lowest detection limits of the direct biosensors can be improved by using a sandwich assay. Smaller analytes (molecular weight < 10,000) are usually measured using inhibition assay, Figure 14. 

The deprotected lactosides were evaluated as inhibitors against lectin binding in a solid-phase inhibition assay with immobilized ASF on the surface of microtiter plate wells, mimicking cell-surface presentation, while mammalian galectins-1, -3, and -5 were in solution. Strong multivalency effects and selectivity were observed for the... 

The deprotected glycodendrimers 542 were tested using a newly developed ELIS A-based inhibition assay for their ability to inhibit the binding of recombinant type-1 fimbriated E. coli (FimH) to a monolayer of T24 cell lines derived from human... 

The assay sensitivity limit is found to be 100 pg of unlabelled-morhine per tube that caused 20% binding inhibition of labelled-dihydromorphine, (see Figure 32.3). 

SPR affinity biosensors have been developed to detect an analyte in a variety of formats. The choice of detection format for a particular application depends on the size of target analyte molecules, binding characteristics of available biomolecular recognition element, and range of concentrations of analyte to be measured. The main detection formats used in SPR biosensors include direct detection (Fig. 11), sandwich assay (Fig. 12) and inhibition assay (Fig. 13). 

For the determination of these compounds a binding inhibition immunoassay, consisting of the competitive immunoreaction of the unbound antibody present in an analyte-antibody mixture with the hapten derivative immobilized at the sensor surface, has been applied. With the aim of assuring the regeneration and reusability of the surface without denaturation of the immobilized molecule, the formation of an alkanethiol monolayer was carried out to provide covalent attachment of the ligand to the functionalized carbodiimide surface in a highly controlled way. For DDT, the assay sensitivity was evaluated in the 0.004 - 3545 pg/l range of pesticide concentration by the determination of the limit of detection 0.3 pg/1 and the I50 value 4.2 pg/1. 

Irth H Continuous-flow systems For ligand binding and enzyme inhibition assays based on mass spectrometry, chapter 5. 

Continuous-flow Systems for Ligand Binding and Enzyme Inhibition Assays Based on Mass Spectrometry... 

---