Bimetallic substrates

Only one trimetallic twelve-vertex metallocarborane has been reported. This species, (C5H5)3Co3C2B7H9, arose as a side product during the polyhedral expansion of 2-C5H6-2-Co-l,6-C2B7H9 with Co(II) and C6H5 (25, 28). The isolation of this trimetallic complex suggests that the polyhedral expansion reaction may be extended to bimetallic substrates to produce novel metal-rich polyhedra. 

Properties of supported catalysts by bimetallic substrates depend on the changes in geometry of the catalyst material by the strain of the substrate. Using a bimetallic substrate multiphes the possibilities to tune the catalyst to specific requirements. The chemistry of the nanosized overlayer is affected by the different orbital overlaps of atoms from the catalyst cluster and those from the substrate. Additionally, small supported metallic islands show low coordination and reduced near-neighbor distances thus their chemical properties are different with respect to those of flat surfaces. " Reactivity of several bimetallics were also studied by Balbuena et al., including bimetallics systems . Norskov et al. found several relations for the bimetallic systems considering local and nonlocal effects have also been reported. ... 

Table 2 gives the location of the island s J-band center for such stmctures. In particular, on a Pt substrate, the center shifts up to -1.63 eV for the about on-top island in 3, whose atoms have coordination number 3, and up to -1.93 eV for the staggered island in 11, whose atoms have average coordination number of four. On a bimetallic substrate CosPt, on the other hand, just as on a Pt substrate, the J-band shifts upward farther for the lower coordinated island in 1, till -2.07 eV, than for the higher coordinated island in 13, till -2.39 eV. In this case, however, the type of atoms present in the immediate neighborhood of the island may also contribute to the shift difference—the island is staggered on top of a Co2Pt cluster in 1 but on top of a C03 cluster in 13. 

A similar increment of the island coordination with the bimetallic substrate CosPt, as in local neighborhood 13 in [CosPtbuik-CosPtsl-Pts, still yields discrete-like spectra for d y and d 2 yi... 

Coatings of more noble metals than the substrate metal (e.g., Cu on Fe) are only protective when there are no pores. In other cases severe local corrosion occurs due to cell formation (bimetallic corrosion). Cathodic protection is theoretically possible. This protection combination is not very efficient since the coating usually consumes more protection current than the uncoated steel. 

Although the rationalization of the reactivity and selectivity of this particular substrate is distinct from that for chiral ketals 92-95, it still agrees with the mechanistic conclusions gained throughout the study of Simmons-Smith cyclopropa-nations. StOl, the possibility of the existence of a bimetallic transition structure similar to v (see Fig. 3.5) has not been rigorously ruled out. No real changes in the stereochemical rationale of the reaction are required upon substitution of such a bimetallic transition structure. But as will be seen later, the effect of zinc iodide on catalytic cyclopropanations is a clue to the nature of highly selective reaction pathways. A similar but unexplained effect of zinc iodide on these cyclopro-panation may provide further information on the true reactive species. 

In contrast, Cozzi and Umani-Ronchi found the (salen)Cr-Cl complex 2 to be very effective for the desymmetrization of meso-slilbene oxide with use of substituted indoles as nucleophiles (Scheme 7.25) [49]. The reaction is high-yielding, highly enantioselective, and takes place exclusively at sp2-hybridized C3, independently of the indole substitution pattern at positions 1 and 2. The successful use of N-alkyl substrates (Scheme 7.25, entries 2 and 4) suggests that nucleophile activation does not occur in this reaction, in stark contrast with the highly enantioselective cooperative bimetallic mechanism of the (salen)Cr-Cl-catalyzed asymmetric azidolysis reaction (Scheme 7.5). However, no kinetic studies on this reaction were reported. 

Recently, however, the development of nanotechnology may provide the changes on the research and development of practical catalysts. As mentioned in the previous section we can now design and synthesize a metal nanoparticle with not only various sizes and shapes, but also with various combinations of elements and their locations. Thus, we can now design the synergetic effect of two elements. In the case of core/shell structured bimetallic nanoparticles, the shell element can provide a catalytic site and the core element can give an electronic effect (a ligand effect) on the shell element. Since only the atoms on the surface can be attached by substrates, the thickness of the shell should be an important factor to control the catalytic performance. 

A new application of bis(oxazolines) ligands was reported by Reiser et al. who obtained some excellent results, such as that depicted in Scheme 2.14 for the 1,4-addition of ZnEt2 to 2-cyclohexenone. These authors used a bimetallic complex in which the substrate was locked in a two-point binding mode via a zinc atom and a copper atom. 

Type (820) dinickel complexes offer the opportunity of substrate binding within the bimetallic pocket, and highly preorganized complexes of this type have also been employed as model systems for the urease metalloenzyme (see Section 6.3.4.12.7). The Ni—Ni separation in type (820) complexes can be... 

Chin at al. have also demonstrated [52] notable bimetallic cooperativ-ity with the same substrate by the Cu(II) complex 34. The dimer complex is 26 times more active (at pH = 7 and T = 298 K) than the corresponding mononuclear species 35. Based on the crystal structure of the dibenzyl phosphate bridged complex, the authors have proposed double Lewis-acid activation, as in the preceding case. 

Even more efficient bimetallic cooperativity was achieved by the dinuclear complex 36 [53]. It was demonstrated to cleave 2, 3 -cAMP (298 K) and ApA (323 K) with high efficiency at pH 6, which results in 300-500-fold rate increase compared to the mononuclear complex Cu(II)-[9]aneN at pH 7.3. The pH-metric study showed two overlapped deprotonations of the metal-bound water molecules near pH 6. The observed bell-shaped pH-rate profiles indicate that the monohydroxy form is the active species. The proposed mechanism for both 2, 3 -cAMP and ApA hydrolysis consists of a double Lewis-acid activation of the substrates, while the metal-bound hydroxide acts as general base for activating the nucleophilic 2 -OH group in the case of ApA (36a). Based on the 1000-fold higher activity of the dinuclear complex toward 2, 3 -cAMP, the authors suggest nucleophilic catalysis of the Cu(II)-OH unit in 36b. The latter mechanism is comparable to those of protein phosphatase 1 and fructose 1,6-diphosphatase. 

The above complexes have been shown to mimic the second step of RNA hydrolysis as well, i.e. the-efficient cleavage of ribonucleoside 2, 3 -cyclic monophosphates [55] with bell-shaped pH-rate profile. With these substrates 37 showed much higher bimetallic cooperativity the dime/2 m0nomer ratios range between 64 and 457 for the different 2, 3 -NMPs used, while for 38 this ratio varies between 1 and 26. Since the mononuclear complexes have nearly the same activity toward the different 2, 3 -NMPs, these kinetic data indicate a notable base-selectivity of the dimer complexes. Since no correlation was observed with the size,... 

Even more interesting is the observed regioselectivity of 37 its reaction with 2, 3 -cCMP and 2, 3 -cUMP resulted in formation of more than 90% of 2 -phosphate (3 -OH) isomer. The postulated mechanisms for 37 consists of a double Lewis-acid activation, while the metal-bound hydroxide and water act as nucleophilic catalyst and general acid, respectively (see 39). The substrate-ligand interaction probably favors only one of the depicted substrate orientations, which may be responsible for the observed regioselectivity. Complex 38 may operate in a similar way but with single Lewis-acid activation, which would explain the lower bimetallic cooperativity and the lack of regioselectivity. Both proposed mechanisms show similarities to that of the native phospho-monoesterases (37 protein phosphatase 1 and fructose 1,6-diphosphatase, 38 purple acid phosphatase). 

The fact that organosamarium allyl complexes of the type Cp 2Sm(CH2CH=CHR) can arise from the treatment of Cp 2Sm or [Cp 2Sm(/r-H)]2 with a variety of olefin and diene substrates makes samarium chemistry more intriguing. The reaction modes are illustrated in Scheme 18. These allylsamarium complexes 55 react with C02 to afford the carboxylate products 56, which participate in monometallic/bimetallic interconversions (Equation (10)). Carbon disulfide and 0=C=S also insert into carbon-samarium bonds, which form only monometallic species.29... 

It should be added that MS-02 is not necessarily a mono-nuclear complex. It could be shown in a few cases that the catalytic activity of the metal ion is due to the formation of dinuclear metal-substrate complexes. Presumably in these species each oxygen atom of dioxygen coordinates to a different metal center. Such systems were extensively used to model the reactivity patterns of various enzymes containing a bimetallic active center. 

Another example of this cooperative catalysis has been presented by Konsler et al.101 in the course of their asymmetric ring-opening (ARO) study. They found that the ARO of mew-epoxides with TMS-N3, catalyzed by Cr salen compound 132, showed a second-order kinetic dependence on the catalyst.102 They then proposed that there might be cooperative, intramolecular bimetallic catalysis taking place, with one metal activating the substrate mew-epoxide and... 

---