Benefits from measuring performance

The early years of this period (mostly the 1980s) were important as the work done in those years led to improvements in the Mossbauer technique [171]. The benefits of this early period were the experience gained, the optimisation of measurement conditions, and the improvement of evaluation programs. Unfortunately, the samples were not well defined during this early period, and bearing in mind the different levels of technique and evaluation procedures involved, it would not be appropriate to compare results from this period to those obtained from measurements performed after 1998. 

Once implemented, the performance measurement system will be subject in its entirety to regular monitoring and use by linking it to planned budgetary allocations. The outcomes will also serve as a barometer to redefine measures, targets, outputs and resources if necessary. In order to derive full benefits from the performance measurement system, SMS may have to be realigned periodically with... 

Controlling the complexity of a model is called regularization. To this end, hold-out data is important. In order to benefit from a training set that is as large as possible and still to be able to measure the performance on unseen data, cross validation is used. It does multiple iterations of training and testing on different partitionings of the data. Leave-one-out is certainly the most prominent concept here [154] however, other ways to partition are in use as well. 

To establish reasonable acceptance criteria for accuracy during planning, we should obtain statistical laboratory control limits from the laboratory that will perform analysis for the project samples. We should also be aware of matrix interferences in environmental samples that may reduce the accuracy of analysis. As part of QC procedures, to estimate the effects of matrix interference on accuracy, laboratories perform the accuracy determinations on environmental samples, known as matrix spike (MS) and matrix spike duplicate (MSD). These fortified samples enable the laboratory to detect the presence of interferences in the analyzed matrices and to estimate their effect on the accuracy of sample analysis. (In the absence of matrix interferences, an additional benefit from MS/MSD analysis is an extra measure of analytical precision calculated as the RPD between the two recoveries.)... 

The NMMS must be able to benefit from and contribute to other existing tools for measuring or understanding an organisation s performance, e.g. other safety-related information systems, audits, Total Quality Programmes, etc. This also means that the level of acceptance of a NMMS should, in itself, be considered as an important measure of an organisation s performance or "safety culture" (see Chapter 6). 

BZs should be reserved for patients at low risk of substance abuse, those who require rapid relief, or those who have not responded to other therapies. Clonazepam is the most extensively studied BZ for treatment of generalized SAD. It improved fear and phobic avoidance, interpersonal sensitivity, fears of negative evaluation, and disability measures. Adverse effects include sexual dysfunction, unsteadiness, dizziness, and poor concentration. Clonazepam should be tapered at a rate not to exceed 0.25 mg every 2 weeks. Gabapentin was effective for SAD, and onset of effect was 2 to 4 weeks. j8-Blockers blunt the peripheral autonomic symptoms of arousal (e.g., rapid heart rate, sweating, blushing, and tremor) and are often used to decrease anxiety in performance-related situations. For specific SAD, 10 to 80 mg of propranolol or 25 to 100 mg of atenolol can be taken 1 hour before the performance. A test dose should be taken at home on a day before the performance to be sure adverse effects wUl not be problematic. Incomplete response to a first-line agent may benefit from augmentation with buspirone or clonazepam. 

Measuring the success of the ATP is very important to us. ATP has an outstanding team of economists who are helping to build a strong story of ATP success. In fact, we just released a status report of the first 38 completed ATP projects, Performance of Completed Projects Status Report Number 1 The status report identified seven projects as potential home runs. When I identify a project as a home run, it must not only have a product in the marketplace, it must also offer big economic benefits. In fact, the benefits from three of these initial projects are projected to more than exceed the entire investment in ATP to date. Two of them are in the biological sciences, but one is in automotive... 

The study of elementary reactions for a specific requirement such as hydrocarbon oxidation occupies an interesting position in the overall process. At a simplistic level, it could be argued that it lies at one extreme. Once the basic mechanism has been formulated as in Chapter 1, then the rate data are measured, evaluated and incorporated in a data base (Chapter 3), embedded in numerical models (Chapter 4) and finally used in the study of hydrocarbon oxidation from a range of viewpoints (Chapters 5-7). Such a mode of operation would fail to benefit from what is ideally an intensely cooperative and collaborative activity. Feedback is as central to research as it is to hydrocarbon oxidation Laboratory measurements must be informed by the sensitivity analysis performed on numerical models (Chapter 4), so that the key reactions to be studied in the laboratory can be identified, together with the appropriate conditions. A realistic assessment of the error associated with a particular rate parameter should be supplied to enable the overall uncertainty to be estimated in the simulation of a combustion process. Finally, the model must be validated against data for real systems. Such a validation, especially if combined with sensitivity analysis, provides a test of both the chemical mechanism and the rate parameters on which it is based. Therefore, it is important that laboratory determinations of rate parameters are performed collaboratively with both modelling and validation experiments. 

Process plants have benefited from the application of process control for many decades. Therefore, one might ask, What is the benefit for optimization beyond successful process control The answer lies in the fundamental difference between control and optimization. In process control, the goal is assumed to be known, and the challenge is to achieve the goal. For example, the set point of each controller is specified, and the control performance is measured as the deviation on the measured variables from its set point. In addition, the relationship (gain) between the adjusted variable and the controlled variable has an unchanging sign. 

---