Polymerization batch reactor emulsion

A summary of the nine batch reactor emulsion polymerizations and fifteen tubular reactor emulsion polymerizations are presented in Tables III IV. Also, many tubular reactor pressure drop measurements were performed at different Reynolds numbers using distilled water to determined the laminar-turbulent transitional flow regime. 

Types of Reactor Processes Batch Reactors Semibatch Reactors Continuous Reactors Emulsion Polymerization Kinetics Other Preparation Methods... 

Emulsion Process. The emulsion polymerization process utilizes water as a continuous phase with the reactants suspended as microscopic particles. This low viscosity system allows facile mixing and heat transfer for control purposes. An emulsifier is generally employed to stabilize the water insoluble monomers and other reactants, and to prevent reactor fouling. With SAN the system is composed of water, monomers, chain-transfer agents for molecular weight control, emulsifiers, and initiators. Both batch and semibatch processes are employed. Copolymerization is normally carried out at 60 to 100°C to conversions of - 97%. Lower temperature polymerization can be achieved with redox-initiator systems (51). 

Soap-starved recipes have been developed that yield 60 wt % soHds low viscosity polymer emulsions without concentrating. It is possible to make latices for appHcation as membranes and similar products via emulsion polymerization at even higher soHds (79). SoHds levels of 70—80 wt % are possible. The paste-like material is made in batch reactors and extmded as product. 

The aqueous emulsion polymerization can be conducted by a batch, semibatch, or continuous process (Fig. 5). In a simple batch process, all the ingredients are charged to the reactor, the temperature is raised, and the polymerization is mn to completion. In a semibatch process, all ingredients are charged except the monomers. The monomers are then added continuously to maintain a constant pressure. Once the desired soflds level of the latex is reached (typically 20—40% soflds) the monomer stream is halted, excess monomer is recovered and the latex is isolated. In a continuous process (37), feeding of the ingredients and removal of the polymer latex is continuous through a pressure control or rehef valve. 

Flexible batch. Both the formula and the processing instructions can change from batch to batch. Emulsion polymerization reactors are a good example of a flexible batch facility. The recipe for each produc t must detail Both the raw materials required and how conditions within the reac tor must be sequenced in order to make the desired product. 

FIG. 23-23 Batch and continuous polymerizations, (a) Polyethylene in a tiihiilar flow reactor, up to 2 km long hy 6,4 cm ID, (h) Batch process for polystyrene, (c) Batch-continuous process for polystyrene, (d) Suspension (head) process for polyvinylchloride, (e) Emulsion process for polyvinylchloride, (Ray and Laurence, in Lapidus and Amundson, eds, Chemical Reactor Theory Review, Frentice-Hall, 1977. )... 

A semi-batch reactor has the same disadvantages as the batch reactor. However, it has the advantages of good temperature control and the capability of minimizing unwanted side reactions by maintaining a low concentration of one of the reactants. Semi-batch reactors are also of value when parallel reactions of different orders occur, where it may be more profitable to use semi-batch rather than batch operations. In many applications semi-batch reactors involve a substantial increase in the volume of reaction mixture during a processing cycle (i.e., emulsion polymerization). 

In order to be economically viable, a continuous emulsion polymerization process must be able to produce a latex which satisfies application requirements at high rates without frequent disruptions. Since most latex products are developed in batch equipment, the problems associated with converting to continuous systems can be significant. Making such a change requires an understanding of the differences between batch and continuous reactors and how these differences influence product properties and reactor performance. 

The advantages of continuous tubular reactors are well known. They include the elimination of batch to batch variations, a large heat transfer area and minimal handling of chemical products. Despite these advantages there are no reported commercial instances of emulsion polymerizations done in a tubular reactor instead the continuous emulsion process has been realized in series-connected stirred tank reactors (1, . ... 

There are many variations on this theme. Fed-batch and continuous emulsion polymerizations are common. Continuous polymerization in a CSTR is dynamically unstable when free emulsifier is present. Oscillations with periods of several hours will result, but these can be avoided by feeding the CSTR with seed particles made in a batch or tubular reactor. 

This paper presents the physical mechanism and the structure of a comprehensive dynamic Emulsion Polymerization Model (EPM). EPM combines the theory of coagulative nucleation of homogeneously nucleated precursors with detailed species material and energy balances to calculate the time evolution of the concentration, size, and colloidal characteristics of latex particles, the monomer conversions, the copolymer composition, and molecular weight in an emulsion system. The capabilities of EPM are demonstrated by comparisons of its predictions with experimental data from the literature covering styrene and styrene/methyl methacrylate polymerizations. EPM can successfully simulate continuous and batch reactors over a wide range of initiator and added surfactant concentrations. 

Continuous emulsion polymerization processes are presently employed for large scale production of synthetic rubber latexes. Owing to the recent growth of the market for polymers in latex form, this process is becoming more and more important also in the production of a number of other synthetic latexes, and hence, the necessity of the knowledge of continuous emulsion polymerization kinetics has recently increased. Nevertheless/ the study of continuous emulsion polymerization kinetics hasf to datef received comparatively scant attention in contrast to batch kinetics/ and very little published work is available at present/ especially as to the reactor optimization of continuous emulsion polymerization processes. For the theoretical optimization of continuous emulsion polymerization reactors/ it is desirable to understand the kinetics of emulsion polymerization as deeply and quantitatively as possible. 

The available data from emulsion polymerization systems have been obtained almost exclusively through manual, off-line analysis of monomer conversion, emulsifier concentration, particle size, molecular weight, etc. For batch systems this results in a large expenditure of time in order to sample with sufficient frequency to accurately observe the system kinetics. In continuous systems a large number of samples are required to observe interesting system dynamics such as multiple steady states or limit cycles. In addition, feedback control of any process variable other than temperature or pressure is impossible without specialized on-line sensors. This note describes the initial stages of development of two such sensors, (one for the monitoring of reactor conversion and the other for the continuous measurement of surface tension), and their implementation as part of a computer data acquisition system for the emulsion polymerization of methyl methacrylate. 

Emulsion Polymerization in a CSTR. Emulsion polymerization is usually carried out isothermally in batch or continuous stirred tank reactors. Temperature control is much easier than for bulk or solution polymerization because the small (. 5 Jim) polymer particles, which are the locus of reaction, are suspended in a continuous aqueous medium as shown in Figure 5. This complex, multiphase reactor also shows multiple steady states under isothermal conditions. Gerrens and coworkers at BASF seem to be the first to report these phenomena both computationally and experimentally. Figure 6 (taken from ref. (253)) plots the autocatalytic behavior of the reaction rate for styrene polymerization vs. monomer conversion in the reactor. The intersection... 

---