Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Barrier-controlled model

Mroczkowska JE, Roux FS, Nalecz MJ, Nalecz KA (2000) Blood-brain barrier controls carnitine level in the brain a study on a model system with RBE4 cells. Biochem Bio-phys Res Commun 267 433-437 Regina A, Koman A, Piciotti M et al. (1998) Mrpl multidrug resistance-associated protein and P-glycoprotein expression in rat brain microvessel endothelial cells. J Neurochem 71 705-715... [Pg.530]

Consider now the motion along this reaction coordinate. This is a motion that (1) connects between the reactant and the product basins of attraction, and (2) proceeds at the top of the barrier, that is, through the saddle point, with no coupling to other modes therefore no interactions or collisions that may cause reflection. This implies, given the original assumption that thermal equilibrium prevails in the reactant well, that TST must hold exactly. In other words, by choosing the correct reaction coordinate, the Kramers model in the barrier-controlled regime can be cast in terms of TST. [Pg.519]

Models which consider diffusion in the bulk as the only rate-controlling process are called diffusion controlled. If the diffusion is assumed to be fast in comparison to the transfer of molecules between the subsurface and the interface the model is called kinetic-controlled or barrier-controlled. Both steps are taken into account in mixed diffusion kinetic controlled models. [Pg.102]

Models considering diffusion in the bulk as the only rate controlling process are called pure diffusion controlled. When the diffusion is assumed to be fast in comparison to the transfer of molecules between the subsurface and the interface the model is called kinetic-controlled or barrier-controlled. Both steps are taken into account in so-called mixed diffusion kinetic controlled models. Van den Tempel proposed processes within the adsorption layer to be considered instead of hypothetical adsorption barriers [18, 19, 20]. We believe that such models, which account for actual physical processes within adsorption layers, such as reorientation of molecules, their dimerisation and formation of clusters, although explanations for all known cases of anomalous adsorption kinetics do not exist yet, have to be preferred over any formal model. However, reliable experimental evidence for a slower surface tension decrease caused by aggregation within the adsorption layer does not allow the conclusion that this is an exclusive mechanism. [Pg.291]

The diffusion controlled adsorption model is the most useful one as it is at present the main basis for all particular adsorption kinetics theories. It has also been demonstrated that for most of the systems for which an adsorption barrier controlled mechanism was discussed surface active impurities had been detected. These impurities can simulate a kinetic controlled adsorption mechanism [53, 54, 55]. [Pg.298]

Depending on the technical equipment of the trough various types of area deformations can be produced by the moving barrier. In a very detailed analysis Joos [16] has demonstrated that the adsorption to or desorption from a liquid interface with changing interfacial area can be described in a very general way. The derivation of a respective diffusion controlled model leads to the following equation... [Pg.309]

Additional short and long time approximations have been summarised by Fainerman et al. [99] based on diffusion-controlled, barrier-controlled and mixed kinetic models. An analysis of the known long time approximations was given by Makievski et al. [15]. They compared the long time approximations given by Hansen and by Joos. While Hansen s approximation [22, 117] yields... [Pg.321]

The major goal of this study was to understand the factors controlling polyolefin branching and the relationship between the catalyst structure, temperature, pressure and the polyolefin topology. The DFT calculations were carried out for the elementary reactions in the polymerization of ethylene and propylene catalyzed by Pd-based diimine catalysts [13c,d] and the ethylene polymerization catalyzed by the Ni-anilinotropone catalyst [28]. The polymer growth in these processes was modeled by a stochastic approach [27-29]. Further, the model simulations were performed by systematically changing insertion barriers to model the influence of catalyst, beyond the diimine systems [29]. [Pg.149]

In diffusion-controlled adsorption models, one assumes that there is no activation energy barrier to the transfer of surfactant molecules between the subsurface and the surface [85]. Thus diffusion is the only mechanism needed in establishing adsorption equilibrium. The time required for the molecules to transfer from the bulk to the subsurface is much longer than the time required for equilibration between the surface and the subsurface. On the contrary, if the adsorption or desorption rate at the interface is slow or comparable to the diffusion rate, the adsorption process is significant. This model is called the mixed-kinetic adsorption model. This condition may depend not only on the properties of the system but also on the diffusion length and possibly on convection conditions. The diffusion-controlled model of Eqs. (3) and (4) have been given by Fainerman et al. [86,87]. [Pg.111]

The general model described in the theory section reduces to the surface barrier control limit if the diffusional time constant is small compared to that of the surface barrier, i.e. 5 1. In order to have a qualitative understanding of the effect of a partial loading experiment we will consider Lo = 20 and vary Tpl and A and fix 5 = 0.1. [Pg.257]

As already mentioned, the surfactants are used to stabilize the liquid films in foams, in emulsions, on solid surfaces, and so forth. We will first consider the equilibrium and kinetic properties of surfactant adsorption monolayers. Various two-dimensional equations of state are discussed. The kinetics of surfactant adsorption is described in the cases of dijfusion and barrier control. Special attention is paid to the process of adsorption from ionic surfactant solutions. Theoretical models of the adsorption from micellar surfactant solutions are also presented. The rheological properties of the surfactant adsorption mono-layers, such as dilatational and shear surface viscosity and suiface elasticity, are introduced. The specificity of the proteins as high-molecular-weight surfactants is also discussed. [Pg.303]

The first models of barrier-controlled adsorption have been formulated by Doss [86] and modified by Ross [87], both starting with the concept of Bond and Puls [88]. Further developments have been achieved by Blair [89], Ward [90], Hansen and Wallace [91], and Dervichian [92]. Baret [93-95] analyzed the balance of the adsorption rad(c F) and de-... [Pg.316]

The accumulated evidence from studies on the OFC suggests that the adsorption of C ,TABs is diffusion-controlled below the cmc. Above the cmc, there are deviations from a diffusion-controlled model for CigTAB + NaBr, which can be quantitatively explained by slow micellar breakdown kinetics. The alternative of an adsorption barrier cannot be ruled out, though there is as yet no evidence of structm es at the air-water interface akin to those observed in the SAR at the solid-liquid interface. More limited studies on other femiUes of ionic scu -factants in the OFC and MBP apparatus do not show large deviations from diffusion control. The importance of well-defined hydrodynamics and accru-ate equilibriiun adsorption isotherms cannot be overstressed in quantitative studies of adsorption mechanisms. There is still a need for measurements at higher strain rates, such as occur in tcffbulent foams, jet breakup and impacting drops, and for additional studies with micellar systems to establish quantitatively the connection between micellar breakdown kinetics and rates of adsorption. [Pg.412]

Analysts The above is a formidable barrier. Analysts must use limited and uncertain measurements to operate and control the plant and understand the internal process. Multiple interpretations can result from analyzing hmited, sparse, suboptimal data. Both intuitive and complex algorithmic analysis methods add bias. Expert and artificial iutefligence systems may ultimately be developed to recognize and handle all of these hmitations during the model development. However, the current state-of-the-art requires the intervention of skilled analysts to draw accurate conclusions about plant operation. [Pg.2550]

The kinetics outlined above, first observed empirically by Giintherschulze and Betz, were modelled by Verwey" with the rate-controlling energy barrier being that between to adjacent cation sites within the oxide film. The same basic form can be derived if the rate-controlling energy barrier is that between a metal atom on the metal surface and an adjacent cation site in the film. The rate is then limited by ion injection into the film rather than... [Pg.131]

Paranjpe, A., and Islamraja, M., CVD TiN Process Modeling for ContactA ia Barriers, Proc. of Symp. on Process Control of Semiconductor Manufacturing, Electrochem. Soc. (May 1995)... [Pg.294]

Ultrasound can thus be used to enhance kinetics, flow, and mass and heat transfer. The overall results are that organic synthetic reactions show increased rate (sometimes even from hours to minutes, up to 25 times faster), and/or increased yield (tens of percentages, sometimes even starting from 0% yield in nonsonicated conditions). In multiphase systems, gas-liquid and solid-liquid mass transfer has been observed to increase by 5- and 20-fold, respectively [35]. Membrane fluxes have been enhanced by up to a factor of 8 [56]. Despite these results, use of acoustics, and ultrasound in particular, in chemical industry is mainly limited to the fields of cleaning and decontamination [55]. One of the main barriers to industrial application of sonochemical processes is control and scale-up of ultrasound concepts into operable processes. Therefore, a better understanding is required of the relation between a cavitation coUapse and chemical reactivity, as weU as a better understanding and reproducibility of the influence of various design and operational parameters on the cavitation process. Also, rehable mathematical models and scale-up procedures need to be developed [35, 54, 55]. [Pg.298]

At temperatures of the order 700 - 900 K the surface point defects play the dominant role in controlling the various eledrophysical parameters of adsorbent on the content of ambient medium [32]. As it has been mentioned in section 1.6, these defects are being formed in the temperature domain in which the respective concentration of volume defects is very small. In fact, cooling an adsorbent down to room temperature results violation of uniform distribution due to redistribution of defects. The availability of non-homogeneous defect distribution led to creation of a new model of depleted surface layer based on the phenomenon of oxidation of surface defects [182] which is an alternative to existing model of the Shottky barrier [183]. [Pg.85]

Using liposomes made from phospholipids as models of membrane barriers, Chakrabarti and Deamer [417] characterized the permeabilities of several amino acids and simple ions. Phosphate, sodium and potassium ions displayed effective permeabilities 0.1-1.0 x 10 12 cm/s. Hydrophilic amino acids permeated membranes with coefficients 5.1-5.7 x 10 12 cm/s. More lipophilic amino acids indicated values of 250 -10 x 10-12 cm/s. The investigators proposed that the extremely low permeability rates observed for the polar molecules must be controlled by bilayer fluctuations and transient defects, rather than normal partitioning behavior and Born energy barriers. More recently, similar magnitude values of permeabilities were measured for a series of enkephalin peptides [418]. [Pg.74]

Since chemical reactions usually show significant nonadiabaticity, there are naturally quantitative errors in the predictions of the vibrationally adiabatic model. Furthermore, there are ambiguities about how to apply the theory such as the optimal choice of coordinate system. Nevertheless, this simple picture seems to capture the essence of the resonance trapping mechanism for many systems. We also point out that the recent work of Truhlar and co-workers24,34 has demonstrated that the reaction dynamics is largely controlled by the quantized bottleneck states at the barrier maxima in a much more quantitative manner than expected. [Pg.49]


See other pages where Barrier-controlled model is mentioned: [Pg.212]    [Pg.178]    [Pg.136]    [Pg.133]    [Pg.149]    [Pg.154]    [Pg.450]    [Pg.104]    [Pg.21]    [Pg.318]    [Pg.200]    [Pg.147]    [Pg.2551]    [Pg.490]    [Pg.546]    [Pg.255]    [Pg.291]    [Pg.180]    [Pg.365]    [Pg.250]    [Pg.102]    [Pg.166]    [Pg.89]    [Pg.53]    [Pg.166]    [Pg.171]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.321 ]




SEARCH



Control models

© 2024 chempedia.info