Auction systems

Use of an auctioneering system to select the highest temperature which will be used to control the flow rate of the coolant (Figure 20.9)... 

Auction systems enable issuers to conduct real-time electronic auctions of their primary offerings of securities. The mechanics of auction systems are similar to those of traditional competitive sales, the exception being that dealers and investors submit bids electronically during a set period of time, instead of using the traditional phone, fax, or hand-delivery methods. Auction systems may also allow bidders to improve bids during the auction period, as they are typically able to see competing bids from other auction participants. 

A tradable permit system is defined as quantity-based environmental policy instrument. The regulatory authority stipulates the allowable total amount of emissions (cap) and the right to emit becomes a tradable commodity. Under a cap-and-trade system, prices are allowed to fluctuate according to market forces. Thus, the price of emissions is established indirectly. Permits could be allocated to firms through auction or free allocation. 

Marquez, AC, Blanchar C (2004) The procurement of strategic parts. Analysis of contracts with suppliers using a system dynamics simulation model. International Journal of Production Economics 88 (1) 29-49 Mason S (2002) Simulation software buyer s guide. HE Solutions May 45-51 McAfee R, McMillan J (1987) Auctions and Bidding. Journal of Economic Literature 25 699-738... 

Most disturbances in chemical engineering systems are load disturbances, such as changes in throughput, feed composition, supply steam pressure, cooling water temperature, etc. The feedback controller s Auction when a load disturbance occurs is to return the controlled variable to its set-point by suitable changes in the manipulated variable. The dosedloop response to a load disturbance is called the regulator response or the closed-loop load response. 

It is possible to build a basic system with chart-recorder output using components from various manufacturers. Suppliers of used equipment are another possible source. Sometimes there are equipment auctions but, having learnt from bitter experience, unless one can actually go and see (and preferably test) the items listed in the catalogue, this method of purchase should be avoided. Very often parts will be missing and, being obsolete, no longer obtainable. Used equipment suppliers always include some form of guarantee, and that is worth its cost. Some used or refurbished equipment suppliers are listed in Appendix 1. 

Some other analysts express the opposite concern, that prices might rise to levels deemed to pose an unacceptable risk to European industry, and that to prevent this risk the system should contain a price cap or safety valve (e.g. Bouttes et al., 2006). Our assessment of phase II, in terms of both supply-demand balance and the economics of competitiveness over the 5-year period, leads us to be sceptical that this is a realistic concern. It is, however, true that a planned response to any such eventuality would be better than a panic-based reaction such as occurred in the California NOx trading system. Should prices rise to levels that were judged to pose a credible threat to competitiveness of a particular sector, and State-aid rules prevented auction revenues being used to assist it (or the country concerned had not conducted any auctions), the most obvious first step would be to relax supplementarity constraints, and possibly expand the scope of emission credits that could qualify for compliance purposes. We do not consider issues of price ceilings or safety valves beyond this. 

The EU ETS is a cap-and-trade system based primarily on the free allocation of a fixed amount of emission allowances to a set of covered installations. Companies can either use these allowances to cover the emissions resulting from the production of these installations or sell them to other companies that need additional allowances (Reinaud, 2005). Hence, for a company using an emission allowance, this represents an opportunity cost, regardless of whether the allowances are allocated for free or purchased at an auction or market. Therefore, in principle and in line with economic theory, a company is expected to add the costs of C02 emission allowances to its other marginal (variable) costs when making (short-term) production or trading decisions, even if the allowances are granted for free (Burtraw et al., 2002, 2005 Reinaud, 2003). 

If, conversely, the allowance allocation system is similar to output-based allocation for an allowance allocation ratio of 90% of historic unitary emissions, neither the production level nor the EBITDA is significantly impacted, even for a very high C02 price ( 50 per tonne). Only if the allocation ratio were to drop below 75% of historic unitary emissions (a very unlikely policy choice) would competitiveness impacts (on production and EBITDA) be severe (above 5%). For any allocation ratio, abatement is reduced compared with auctioning or grandfathering, but so is leakage, and finally world emissions are almost the same. 

This phenomenon is examined in two other articles in this Special Issue. In the electricity sector, Neuhoff et al. (this issue) demonstrate that the sheer value of free allocations in a sequentially negotiated trading system makes it hard to avoid some distortionary effects. Demailly and Quirion (this issue) also confirm that if allowances are allocated as a function of production whether contemporaneously (as in output-based allocation) or in the future (as with updating), output choices are correspondingly distorted. Auctioning would obviously reduce or eliminate these effects. 

The principle of GEP for the BMS system controlling offices, restrooms, and corridors was adopted. The project milestones were then planned and auctioned in accordance with the combined (cGMP/GEP) plan. The suppher was audited and commissioned with the understanding that it must participate in the risk assessments. It was agreed that savings in project costs would be shared however, the company s QA audit group would assess the whole project and fines could be applied if breaches in quality were detected. 

E-trading platform Focus on highly standardized commodity chemicals Real-time auctions Financial products for risk management E-exchange Focus on intermediates, fine chemicals and specialties Auctions based on bid and ask system Additional value added services, e.g., online product testing... 

In colonial Vietnam, the head tax, or capitation, was levied on whole communities on the basis of their presumed population. If the sum were not remitted, the police would come and hold an auction of whatever they could seize (e.g., water buffalos, furniture, jewelry) until they had the required sum. This system gave the village notables, who owned most of the goods worth seizing, an incentive to make sure that the taxes were remitted on time. 

M. Fan, J. Stallaert, and A. B. Whinston, Decentralized Mechanism Design for Supply Chain Organizations Using an Auction Market, Information Systems Research, 14(1), 1-22 (2003). 

Figure 20.9 Auctioneering control system for a tubular catalytic reactor.

---