Attractor behavior

We have encountered oscillating and random behavior in the convergence of open-shell transition metal compounds, but have never tried to determine if the random values were bounded. A Lorenz attractor behavior has been observed in a hypervalent system. Which type of nonlinear behavior is observed depends on several factors the SCF equations themselves, the constants in those equations, and the initial guess. 

Points on the zero-flux surfaces that are saddle points in the density are passes or pales. Should the critical point be located on a path between bonded atoms along which the density is a maximum with respect to lateral displacement, it is known as a pass. Nuclei behave topologically as peaks and all of the gradient paths of the density in the neighborhood of a particular peak terminate at that peak. Thus, the peaks act as attractors in the gradient vector field of the density. Passes are located between neighboring attractors which are linked by a unique pair of trajectories associated with the passes. Cao et al. [11] pointed out that it is through the attractor behavior of nuclei that distinct atomic forms are created in the density. In the theory of molecular structure, therefore, peaks and passes play a crucial role. 

Kaneko [kaneko86a] has, in fact, pointed out that, despite being strictly defined only for infinitely large systems, the four generic behavioral classes appear to be well characterized by the number and length of their attractors on finite lattices ... 

Class c3 Small number of attractors with long periods. The number of attractors changes irregularly as N increases, and, at least for some rules, appears to depend on some number-theoretic properties of the size and rule. A singular behavior, for example, frequently occurs near N = 2 — i, where i = 0,1 or — 1, depending on the rule. 

Figures 3.38 and 3.39 show typical space-time patterns generated by a few r = 1 reversible rules starting from both simple and disordered initial states. Although analogs of the four generic classes of behavior may be discerned, there are important dynamical differences. The most important difference being the absence of attractors, since there can never be a merging of trajectories in a reversible system for finite lattices this means that the state transition graph must consist exclusively of cyclic states. We make a few general observations.

Strange Attractors The motion on strange attractors exhibits many of the properties normally associated with completely random or chaotic behavior, despite being well-defined at all times and fully deterministic. More formally, a strange attractor S is an attractor (meaning that it satisfies properties (i)-(iii) above) that also displays sensitivity to initial conditions. In the case of a one-dimensional map, Xn+i = for example, this means that there exists a <5 > 0 such that for... 

Behavior for a > aoo- What happens for a > Qoo The simple answer is that the logistic map exhibits a transition to chaos, with a variety of different attractors for Qoo < a < 4 exhibiting exponential divergence of nearby points. To leave it at that, however, would surely bo a great disservice to the extraordinarily beautiful manner in which this trairsition takes place. 

An overview is provided by figure 4.7 plot (a) shows the numerically determined attractor sets for all 2.9 < a < 4 plot (b) - lest it be thought that the white regions in plot (a) are artifacts of the printing process - shows a blowup view of the windowed region within one of those wide white bands in plot (a). The general behavior is summarized as follows ... 

The discussion of the randomness of the Bernoulli map iterates therefore applies equally well to the behavior of the a = 4 attractor set of the logistic equation. 

The typical strategy employed in studying the behavior of nonlinear dissipative dynamical systems consists of first identifying all of the periodic solutions of the system, followed by a detailed characterization of the chaotic motion on the attractors. 

The spatial and temporal dimensions provide a convenient quantitative characterization of the various classes of large time behavior. The homogeneous final states of class cl CA, for example, are characterized by d l = dll = dmeas = dmeas = 0 such states are obviously analogous to limit point attractors in continuous systems. Similarly, the periodic final states of class c2 CA are analogous to limit cycles, although there does not typically exist a unique invariant probability measure on... 

Since we will be dealing with finite graphs, we can analyze the behavior of random Boolean nets in the familiar fashion of looking at their attractor (or cycle) state structure. Specifically, we choose to look at (1) the number of attractor state cycles, (2) the average cyclic state length, (3) the sizes of the basins of attraction, (4) the stability of attractors with respect to minimal perturbations, and (4) the changes in the attractor states and basins of attraction induced by mutations in the lattice structure and/or the set of Boolean rules. 

Attractor states arc tyirically stable with respect to 80 - 95% of the possible minimal perturbations, and mutations (by which sites are deleted or Boolean functions of single sites are altered) affect the dynamical behavior only slightly. 

In the present chapter, steady state, self-oscillating and chaotic behavior of an exothermic CSTR without control and with PI control is considered. The mathematical models have been explained in part one, so it is possible to use a simplified model and a more complex model taking into account the presence of inert. When the reactor works without any control system, and with a simple first order irreversible reaction, it will be shown that there are intervals of the inlet flow temperature and concentration from which a small region or lobe can appears. This lobe is not a basin of attraction or a strange attractor. It represents a zone in the parameters-plane inlet stream flow temperature-concentration where the reactor has self-oscillating behavior, without any periodic external disturbance. 

The simulation result (Figure 4) shows that when two initial conditions are very close, after a dimensionless time of 40 units the concentration of reactant A and the reactor temperature are completely different. This means that the system has a chaotic behavior and their d3mamical states diverge from each other very quickly, i.e. the system has high sensitivity to initial conditions. This separation increases with time and the exponential divergence of adjacent phase points has a very important consequence for the chaotic attractor, i.e. 

It is important to remark that this behavior is similar to that previously considered by Eqs.(9), when two external periodic disturbances are applied. Nevertheless, this behavior can be very difficult to obtain, because the lobe of Figure 8 is small. Figures 10 and 11 shows chaotic oscillations and a new strange attractor. By simulation it is possible to obtain plots similar to those in Figures 2, 4, 5 and 6. 

According to the Shilnikov s theorem, the reactor presents a chaotic behavior. In order to test the presence of a strange attractor, it is necessary to raise the value of xe ax to introduce a perturbation in the vector field around the homoclinic orbit. Taking xemax = 5, the results of the simulation are shown in Figure 18, where the sensitive dependence on initial conditions has been corroborated. 

The maximum Lyapunov exponent (MLE) was computed to provide major evidence of nonperiodic oscillatory behavior. MLE is one of the most important features in nonlinear science to distinguish chaotic from non chaotic behavior. Essentially MLE measures the distance between attractor orbits... 

A set of experiments on gas-liquid motion in a vertical column has been carried out to study its d3mamical behavior. Fluctuations volume fraction of the fluid were indirectly measured as time series. Similar techniques that previous section were used to study the system. Time-delay coordinates were used to reconstruct the underl3ung attractor. The characterization of such attractor was carried out via Lyapunov exponents, Poincare map and spectral analysis. The d3mamical behavior of gas-liquid bubbling flow was interpreted in terms of the interactions between bubbles. An important difference between this study case and former is that gas-liquid column is controlled in open-loop by manipulating the superficial velocity. The gas-liquid has been traditionally studied in the chaos (turbulence) context [24]. 

Essentially, MLE is a measure on time-evolution of the distance between orbits in an attractor. When the dynamics are chaotic, a positive MLE occurs which quantifies the rate of separation of neighboring (initial) states and give the period of time where predictions are possible. Due to the uncertain nature of experimental data, positive MLE is not sufficient to conclude the existence of chaotic behavior in experimental systems. However, it can be seen as a good evidence. In [50] an algorithm to compute the MLE form time series was proposed. Many authors have made improvements to the Wolf et al. s algorithm (see for instance [38]). However, in this work we use the original algorithm to compute the MLE values. 

Yet another type of complex oscillatory behavior involves the coexistence of multiple attractors. Hard excitation refers to the coexistence of a stable steady state and a stable limit cycle—a situation that might occur in the case of circadian rhythm suppression discussed in Section VI. Two stable limit... 

Controlled chaos may also factor into the generation of rhythmic behavior in living systems. A recently proposed modeL describes the central circadian oscillator as a chaotic attractor. Limit cycle mechanisms have been previously offered to explain circadian clocks and related phenomena, but they are limited to a single stable periodic behavior. In contrast, a chaotic attractor can generate rich dynamic behavior. Attractive features of such a model include versatility of period selection as well as use of control elements of the type already well known for metabolic circuitry. 

For the purpose of illustration, in this paper we use a viscosity-capillarity model (Truskinovsky, 1982 Slemrod, 1983) as an artificial "micromodel",and investigate how the information about the behavior of solutions at the microscale can be used to narrow the nonuniqueness at the macroscale. The viscosity-capillarity model contains a parameter -Je with a scale of length, and the nonlinear wave equation is viewed as a limit of this "micromodel" obtained when this parameter tends to zero. As we show, the localized perturbations of the form x /-4I) can influence the choice of attractor for this type of perturbation, support (but not amplitude) vanishes as the small parameter goes to zero. Another manifestation of this effect is the essential dependence of the limiting solution on the... 

A more complicated behavior of the MLE is observed for higher values of 7j. Varying the length of the pulse 7j, we observe regions of order and chaos. By way of an example, the phase portrait Reoti versus Imai for a chaotic attractor is shown in Fig. 15. 

---