Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Assessment tools Scale

Pain, particularly acute pain, may be accompanied by physiologic signs and symptoms, and there are no reliable objective markers for pain. Many tools have been designed for assessing the severity of pain including rating scales and multidimensional pain assessment tools. [Pg.491]

Multidimensional assessment tools obtain information about the pain and impact on quality of life, but are often more time-consuming to complete. Examples of these types of tools include the Initial Pain Assessment Tool, Brief Pain Inventory, McGill Pain Questionnaire, the Neuropathic Pain Scale, and the Oswestry Disability Index.29-33... [Pg.491]

Pharmacotherapy of SAD should lead to improvement in physiologic symptoms of anxiety and fear, functionality, and overall well-being.26 Many patients may not achieve full remission of symptoms but should have significant improvement. Monitor patients weekly during acute treatment (e.g., initiation and titration of pharmacotherapy). Once patients are stabilized, monitor monthly. Inquire about adverse effects and SAD symptoms at each visit. To aid in assessing improvement, ask patients to keep a diary to record fears, anxiety levels, and behaviors in social situations.26 You may administer the Leibowitz Social Anxiety Scale (LSAS) to rate SAD severity and change, and the Social Phobia Inventory can be used as a self-assessment tool for SAD patients. [Pg.618]

This chapter is organized as follows. We first present a short description of the criteria used for selecting the data used for driving the hydrological simulations at the basin scale. Subsequently, we briefly describe Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT), the hydrological model adopted for this study, and the setup thereof. Later on, we continue with a brief review of the main spatio-temporal patterns of climate,... [Pg.48]

Standardized assessment tools have also been constructed for ulcerative colitis. Elements in these scales include (1) stool frequency (2) presence of blood in the stool (3) mucosal appearance (from endoscopy) and (4) physician s global assessment based on physical examination, endoscopy, and laboratory data. [Pg.306]

Cavaletti G, Frigeni B, Lanzani F et al (2007) The total neuropathy score as an assessment tool for grading the course of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neurotoxicity comparison with the National Cancer Institute-Common Toxicity Scale. J Peripher Nerv Syst 12 210-215... [Pg.322]

We have discussed a series of examples and aspects, such as the problem of risk and sustainability assessment, tools and principles for a sustainable industrial development (in particular, the issue of scaling-down and intensification of chemical processes, and the role of catalysis), and problems and opportunities in substituting chemical and processes (also in the view of REACH legislation, and of the international chemicals policy on sustainability). These topics are expanded in the following chapters, while the final section on industrial case histories for sustainable chemical processes provides further hints on these aspects. [Pg.69]

It is frustrating that the results of the study are somewhat equivocal. We are pleased that the CAMS study confirms the strong anecdotal evidence of the benefit of cannabis for some people with MS. It is particularly encouraging that patients receiving cannabis perceived an improvement in both spasticity and pain, when compared with those on placebo, and that no significant side-effects were reported. However, it is clear that the primary assessment tool used to measure spasticity, the Ashworth Scale, has failed to capture the full impact of this aspect of MS. Spasticity is a complex collection of symptoms encompassing pain and stiffness, some of which can only accurately be as-... [Pg.727]

There is great variability in the frequency and severity of acute pain episodes associated with SCD. Thus the pain should be assessed and analgesic therapy should be tailored for each patient. Pain scales can be useful to quantify the degree of pain. Several pain assessment tools are available. Unfortunately, they have not been validated for sickle ceU pain. The health care provider should choose one tool appropriate for age and use it routinely to assess pain. Other useful information to guide choice of analgesics should include previous effective agents and their dosages, response to therapy and previous clinical course, and duration of pain crisis... [Pg.1869]

A consensus is being developed on the urgent need for integrated and dynamic assessment tools. TTiese are needed both at the larger scale of the economy and at the local... [Pg.70]

Pinero D, Jones B, Beard J. 2001. Variations in dietary iron alter behavior in developing laXs.JNutr 131 311-318. Piper MC, Darrah J. 1994. Alberta Infant Motor Scale Construction of a Motor Assessment Tool for the Developing Infant. Philadelphia WB Saunders Company. Pp. 25-35. [Pg.157]

In this study, indirect assessment tool like survey questionnaire with Likert s scale of five values (strongly agree (S A), agree (A), neutral (N), disagree (D), and strongly disagree (SD)) is used to know about student s perception about this case study. The... [Pg.509]

Total RBP measurements, however, are indicative of plasma levels of vitamin A under most survey conditions and would be equivalent to direct vitamin A determination for assessment purposes, providing the population excludes those suffering from relatively short-term or chronic severe calorie and/or protein deficit and those suffering from diseases (e.g., of the liver) that will affect RBP levels (see Chapter 7). Currently there has been no report of a large-scale survey in which both parameters have been measured to determine their comparability as assessment tools for vitamin A nutriture. Reddy et al. (1979) found children with mild forms of PEM had values for both RBP and retinol similar to normal children. [Pg.337]

Physical (scale) models employing wind tunnels or water channels have been used for dense gas dispersion simulation, especially for situations with obstructions or irregular terrain. Exact similarity in all scales and the re-creation of atmospheric stability and velocity distributions are not possible— very low air velocities are required to match large scale results. Havens et al (1995) attempted to use a 100-1 scale approach in conjunction with a finite element model. They found that measurements from such flows cannot be scaled to field conditions accurately because of the relative importance of the molecular difiusion contribution at model scale. The use of scale models is not a common risk assessment tool in CPQRA and readers are direaed to additional reviews by Mcroncy (1982), and Duijm et al. (1985). [Pg.112]

The Figure 4 shows some results of the research of the comparative data from Portugal and Brazil with 54 operators. There is the data of the six variables of NASA-TLX subjective assessment tools MD (mental demand), RP (Requirement Physics), TR (Temporal Requirement), LA (Level of Achievement), LE (Level of Effort) and LF (Level of Frustration). The scale corresponds to the first minimum value 1 and the maximum index 20. [Pg.3]

In the book Project Sponsorship by Randall Englund and Alfonso Bucero, feedback bias may be alleviated by the use of a Feedback Action Plan and a Feedback Assessment Tool. A Feedback Action Plan allows decision makers to map out, early in the decision-making process, the sources of data to be sought, the media in which the feedback will be delivered, the timeliness of the reception of that feedback, and an action plan for use of the feedback received. A Feedback Assessment Tool is a list of feedback items that can be graded on a scale of 1 to 10 in order to allow the decision-making team to assess the quality and diversity of feedback items received, and then evaluate the changes in decisions made based on that feedback. [Pg.101]

The nurse may request that the patient evaluate the pain using a standardized pain scale measurement tool. The pain is rated using a scale of 1 to 10, with 10 being the most severe pain and 1 being the least discomfort. Failure to adequately assess pain is a major factor in the undertreatment of pain. [Pg.172]


See other pages where Assessment tools Scale is mentioned: [Pg.492]    [Pg.15]    [Pg.114]    [Pg.50]    [Pg.293]    [Pg.27]    [Pg.640]    [Pg.395]    [Pg.34]    [Pg.419]    [Pg.689]    [Pg.123]    [Pg.57]    [Pg.131]    [Pg.274]    [Pg.152]    [Pg.3]    [Pg.259]    [Pg.170]    [Pg.286]    [Pg.131]    [Pg.165]    [Pg.39]    [Pg.926]    [Pg.413]    [Pg.163]    [Pg.124]    [Pg.370]    [Pg.1]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.210 ]




SEARCH



Scale assessment

Scaling assessments

Tool scale

© 2024 chempedia.info