Area constraints

Two conclusions can be made at this stage of the discussion. Firstly, when surface area constraints are important, direct conversion of solar energy wins out over biomass. Estimates of an increase in biomass yields using bio-engineering approaches amount to not more than a factor of 2 [7]. 

You re told that llamas need a certain amount of grazing area in order to thrive. Armed with the area constraints, you can go about figuring out how to create the needed room for a hungry llama. 

A5) Area constraints for each exchanger without bypass... 

Floudas and Grossmann (1987b) give the specific form of these constraints. The energy balance and area constraints are, in general, nonlinear. 

Thus simulation (e.g., the feasibility test in Section III,A,1 with area constraints replacing the ATm constraints) and costing should be used to evaluate the final design choices. 

In a subsequent study, Or and Tuller (1999) have used the pore-scale model to develop a statistical framework for upscaling from pore to a sample of variably saturated porous medium. The statistical distribution of pore sizes was modeled as a gamma distribution with the expected values of liquid configuration in pore space calculated from geometrical and chemical potential considerations within the statistical framework. One of the advantages of Or and Tuller (1999) framework is the use of measurable media properties to estimate upscaling parameters. This is accomplished by matching predicted and measured retention data subject to measured porosity and surface area constraints. 

Specific Surface Area Constraint. An important requirement for model parameter estimation is that calculated sample scale specific surface area should be within 90% of independently measured surface area. A 90% limit was chosen based on the relatively large uncertainty in most standard methods for surface area measurements [e.g., EGME method (Carter et al., 1986)]. The sample scale expected value of specific surface area SAe is calculated according to ... 

It is only the weak, global conservation of area constraint that gives a term in the free energy proportional to the area. This constraint is negligible for large areas and we thus consider here the thermodynamic limit of the fluctuations of infinitely large, nearly flat membranes. 

Here k is the bending modulus, and the subscripts of xx and yy represent two derivatives of the membrane position variable — i.e., h + h yy) is the mean curvature of the nth membrane. This expression is correct for membranes with gentle undulations (Vh 1) otherwise the simple expression for the curvature is incorrect and the area constraints must be reconsidered as well. The compressional elastic constant, B, represents an effective repulsion between the membranes and will be computed self-consistently. Note that this Hamiltonian is unchanged if the positions of all the membranes are uniformly shifted, representing a trivial translation of the system. Fourier transforming in both the z direction (Fourier wavevector Q with an upper cutoff of nlD due to the periodicity) and the a — y plane (Fourier wavevector q — qy)) we have... 

By examination of (6.33) it becomes clear that in the absence of device area constraints if 1// noise can be avoided, it is desirable to increase the MOSFET gate width W until C3 = 3. In this case Cj includes the capacitance introduced by the switch Sj. With C3 = 3 the minimum detectable charge will be... 

In general the premultiplexing function of the CID readout is very attractive in that it physically separates the detection and signal processing functions and allows a preamplifier to be introduced before input to the CCD. With the CID, the signal processing function has no chip area constraint and noise problems associated with direct injection are avoided. However the CID approach requires more preamplifier gain and power dissipation than those approaches which introduce TDI before preamplification. 

Initially, all operations are assigned to a single control step. This step is then split due to procedure calls, and when the chaining exceeds the length of the step or the area exceeds the area constraint. 

Description and Constraint Components. Each of the three domains may also contain both a description component and a constraint component. The description is a representation of the design as it exists at that point in the design process. This description may be provided by the user (e.g., as the input description for a synthesis system) or it may be built under program control as an intermediate or final representation of the design and linked to the user-supplied information. The second component of each domain, the set of constraints restrains the design process. These constraints may be represented separately from the description, or they may be combined with the description, possibly as attributes. Timing constraints, area constraints, and power consumption constraints are typical examples. 

This chapter describes CSTEP, a scheduling algorithm that uses techniques drawn from microcode compaction. Unlike other approaches, CSTEP has a primary goal of dealing with interface timing constraints as well as performance and area constraints. 

In contrast to the adhesion of liquid droplets where Z would be the surface tension, for vesicle adhesion t is not an independent quantity but rather given by the (numerical) value of the Lagrange multiplier used to implement the area constraint. As eq. (6) shows, E is a function of both the reduced volume through Peff( ) nd W. 

At = 0.01, and the initial radius vq = 22.21. We use the Lagrange multipher y in order to satisfy the area incompressibility, but a numerical error accumulates during the simulation which violates the fixed local area constraint. In order to suppress the error below a harmless level, we use a penalty functional for local areas [12]. The total area A(t) is nicely conserved ( S(t)/S(0) — 11 < 0.0026) and a maximum deviation of a local area from its initial area in suppressed within 6% of its initial area throughout simulations. Figure 1 shows vesicle shapes (A = 0.5) at a late stage t = 300) for different lateral averages in 0, (a) a critical quench <0> = 0 and off-critical ones (b)... 

Example 1.11 shows a simple dc shell script to read in a design, compile, and write out a netlist of the design in VHDL. The file constraints.scr must contain timing and area constraints. Optimization constraints are discussed in greater detail in Chapter 4. For man pages on any of the DC commands, use the help command at the dc.shell prompt as shown below ... 

Figure 4.1 shows the two types of synthesis constraints and the related dc shell commands. Optimization constraints are user specified constraints. The two optimization constraints are speed and area constraints. In other words, DC considers speed and area as the two criteria for optimization. In addition to optimization constraints, the synthesis tool is required to meet another set of constraints called Design Rule Constraints (DRC). DRC are constraints imposed upon the design by requirements specified in the target technology library. Thus, DRC have precedence over optimization constraints since DRCs have to be met in order to realize a functional design. 

Speed and area constraints are the two optimization constraints. These constraints are specified by the designer. DC assigns higher priority to timing constraints over area constraints. In other words, DC aims to meet timing constraints before performing area optimization. 

Area constraints are specified using the set max area command. The total area of a design is the sum of the area of all the cells used in the design and the area due to wires (if specified in the wire load model). 

Max Area cost has the least priority in cost calculation. By default, the tool does not optimize for area once the timing constraints are met. In other words, if explicit area constraints are specified, DC performs area optimization. Since synthesis results are dependent to a large extent on a number of factors such as constraints, libraries and coding styles, optimization of a design is an iterative process. 

Often the chip architecture produced by behavioral synthesis tools such as VSS contain inefficiencies such as constants that can be propagated through a design, and common subexpressions that appear multiple times in the design, each time with replicated hardware. These can partly result from the fashion in which the user wrote the behavioral description. Also, optimization must modify the design in the direction of meeting time and area constraints. Tradeoffs must be made along different paths. On critical paths optimizations that reduce... 

The third equation represents the Maxwell equal-area constraint or, equivalently, the equality of the fugacities of the two equilibrium phases. By assigning experimental... 

---