Applicability with different eluents

This point needs little coiment. Clearly, permittivity and conductivity devices have a disadvantage compared with the refractometer. Absorption spectrometry (UV) and fluorimetry also forbid the use of certain eluents, but this is not a great 

---

In environmental analytical applications where analyte concentrations, e.g. surfactants or their metabolites, are quite low, extraction and concentration steps become essential. Solid phase extraction (SPE) with cartridges, disks or SPME fibres (solid phase micro extraction) because of its good variety of SP materials available has become the method of choice for the analysis of surfactants in water samples in combination with FIA as well as LC—MS analysis. SPE followed by sequential selective elution provides far-reaching pre-separations if eluents with different polarities and their mixtures are applied. The compounds under these conditions are separated in the MS spectrometer by their m/z ratios providing an overview of the ionisable compounds contained in a sample. Identification in the sense it has been mentioned before, however, requires the generation of fragments. 

Certain SEC applications solicit specific experimental conditions. The most common reason is the limited sample solubility. In this case, special solvents or increased temperature are inavoid-able. A possibility to improve sample solubility and quality of eluent offer multicomponent solvents (Sections 16.2.2 and 16.8.2). The selectivity of polymer separation by SEC drops with the deteriorating eluent quality due to decreasing differences in the hydrodynamic volume of macromolecules with different molar masses. The system peaks appear on the chromatograms obtained with mixed eluents due to preferential solvation of sample molecules (Sections 16.3.2 and 16.3.3). The multicomponent eluents may create system peaks also as a result of the (preferential) sorption of their components within column packing [144,145]. The extent of preferential sorption is often sensitive toward pressure variations [69,70,146-149]. Even if the specific detectors are used, which do not see the eluent composition changes, it is necessary to discriminate the bulk sample solvent from the SEC separated macromolecules otherwise the determined molecular characteristics can be affected. This is especially important if the analyzed polymer contains a tail of fractions possessing lower molar masses (Sections 16.4.4 and 16.4.5). 

The use of an acetonitrile/methanol/water eluent has been shown to improve resolution of PAH chromatographed on a Vydac reverse phase column. This improved resolution should result in greater precision and accuracy in the quantitation of individual PAH, Determination of optimal solvent concentration is simplified through application of statistical design techniques. These techniques can be further utilized to investigate various ternary mobile phases in combination with different stationary phases. 

HPLC is performed on analytical columns packed with a commercially available solid phase containing long hydrocarbon chains (e.g. Cg, Cig) chemically bound onto silica. Chemicals injected onto such a column move along at different rates because of the different degrees of partitioning between the mobile aqueous phase and the stationary hydrocarbon phase. The HPLC method is not applicable to strong acids and bases, metals complexes, surface-active materials, or substances that react with the eluent. The HPLC method is applicable when the log Kow value falls within the range 0 to 6 (OECD 117, 1989). The HPLC method is less sensitive to the presence of impurities in the test compound compared to the shake-flask method. 

Several high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) separation techniques have been used in combination with different detection methods to characterize poly(ethylene glycol)s and their amphiphilic derivatives. SEC is a particularly attractive analytical tool for the investigation of non-ionic surfactants because it can provide information for their composition, molecular weight, and molecular-weight distribution along with their micellization in selective solvents. This entry wiU survey briefly both applications with major emphasis on the choice of the most appropriate eluent and stationary phase. 

Figure 4 Separation of stilbestrol derivatives on RP precoated plates with different degrees of modification. Plates a. HPTLC precoated plate RP-18W F254s b. HPTLC precoated plate RP-18 F254s. Eluent metha-nol/water 80/20 v/v. Migration distance 5 cm. Chamber normal chamber without saturation. Compounds 1, diethylstilbestrol-dimethyl ether 2, diethylstilbestrol-mono-methyl ether 3, dielhylstilbestrol (all 0.1 %). Application volume 2(X) nl. Detection in-situ evaluation with TLC/HPTLC scanner (Camag) UV 254 nm.

The optimization of preparative and even micropreparative chromatography depends on the choice of an appropriate chromatographic system (adsorbent and eluent), sample application and development mode to ensure high purity, and yield of desirable compounds isolated from the layer. For the so-called difficult separations, it is necessary to perform rechromatography by using a system with a different selectivity. But it should be taken into account that achievement of satisfactory results frequently depends on a compromise between yield and the purity of the mixture component that is being isolated. 

As a typical application, the separation of an octylphenoxy-terminated PEO with respect to the terminal groups by LCCC is presented in Fig. 17.6. Similar to previous investigations on RP-18 stationary phases (Gorshkov et al., 1990 Pasch and Zammert, 1994), the critical eluent composition was achieved with methanol-water 86 14% by volume. Five well-separated peaks appeared in the chromatogram, which could be identified by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry as being different functionality fractions. Accordingly, separation took place strictly with respect to the chemical structure of the end groups. 

---