Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Anionic-nonionic surfactant systems interactions

An elegant innovation to aid the study of polymer/surfactant interaction was the introduction of a fluorescent label directly onto the polymer molecule by covalent bonding. [See reviews by Winnik (43,44).] This approach has been particularly useful in systems, such as combinations of nonionic polymers and nonionic surfactants, where interaction is weak. For example, pyrene-labeled hydroxypropylcellulose (HPC) gave evidence of association with weakly reactive OTG (n-octyl-P-D-thioglucopyranoside) but only at concentrations near its c.m.c. (119). Experiments with pyrene-labeled PNIPAM have been reported by Winnik et al. (120), who obtained evidence of noncooperative association of this polymer with anionic and cationic surfactants. A polymer that has been terminally labeled with pyrene groups is PEO (121) in mixtures with SDS at lower concentrations fluorescence data indicated the polymer chain cyclized. At higher concentration the pyrene groups were located in separate micelles. [Pg.160]

To reduce the strong interactions occurring between protein and surfactant with AOT systems during LLE, anionic [8,32] and nonionic surfactants [30,33,142] and other interfacial additives [88,124,143] have been included. An improvement on the percent extraction of protein has also been reported for several of these cases [29,32,33,124,142,143]. [Pg.483]

In this paper, we report the solution properties of sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)-alkyl poly(oxyethylene) ether (CjjPOEjj) mixed systems with addition of azo oil dyes (4-NH2, 4-OH). The 4-NH2 dye interacts with anionic surfactants such as SDS (11,12), while 4-OH dye Interacts with nonionic surfactants such as C jPOEn (13). However, 4-NH2 is dependent on the molecular characteristics of the nonionic surfactant in the anlonlc-nonlonic mixed surfactant systems, while in the case of 4-OH, the fading phenomena of the dye is observed in the solubilized solution. This fading rate is dependent on the molecular characteristics of nonionic surfactant as well as mixed micelle formation. We discuss the differences in solution properles of azo oil dyes in the different mixed surfactant systems. [Pg.69]

However, In the two anionic-nonionic systems, an increase in the ionic strength of the solution produces first an increase, and then a decrease, in the strength of the interaction between the two surfactants. Our explanation for this initial increase (4) is that, in the presence of anionic surfactant, there is complexing of the... [Pg.161]

CnSOC-CyFNa (nonionic-anionic) system. In order to avoid the complex structure and function of polyoxyethylene group.in a common nonionic surfactant (e.g. TX100), we use octylmethyl sulfoxide as a partner in the pair system to study the molecular interactions. The surface tension of the surfactants solutions (with and without adding salt) are shown in fig.6 and 7. The surface properties of 1 1 CgSOC-CyFNa system with adding salt (from Fig.6) are shown in Table 7. [Pg.194]

The nature of surface adsorption and micelle formation of various mixed FC- and HC-surfactants systems can be conveniently and well investigated by the non-ideal solution theory semi-emplrlcally applied in the surface layer and micelles. The weak "mutual phobic" interaction between FC- and HC-chains has been clearly revealed in the anionic-anionic and nonlonic-nonionic systems as Indicated by the positive values. value cannot be obtained... [Pg.197]

The third factor determining the distribution of surfactant between the solution and the surface phase is represented by the third term from the right in Equation 17. It involves the interaction between the two surfactant species, i.e. Xl2 Analysis of the cmc of mixed surfactant systems (6-7) reveals that there is normally a net attraction when anionic and nonionic surfactants are mixed. This corresponds to a negative Xi2 suggested explanation is that the... [Pg.232]

An interesting example of a specific ion effect in microemulsions is a strong increase in reactivity found for large, polarizable anions such as iodide. The tendency for such ions to interact with, and accumulate at, the interface can be taken advantage of for preparative purposes. The increased concentration of such ions in the interfacial zone, where the reaction takes place, will lead to an increase in reaction rate. Expressed differently, the reactivity of iodide and other highly polarizable ions [62, 63] will be very high in such systems. The microemulsions need not be based on cationic surfactants that would drive the anions to the interface by electrostatic attraction. Also microemulsions based on nonionic surfactants display the effect because large, polarizable anions interact... [Pg.68]

Surfactant concentration (varied after polymerization) greatly affects the viscosity of associating polymer systems. Iliopoulos et al. studied the interactions between sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) and hydrophobically modified polyfsodium acrylate) with 1 or 3 mole percent of octadecyl side groups [85]. A viscosity maximum occurred at a surfactant concentration close to or lower than the critical micelle concentration (CMC). Viscosity increases of up to 5 orders of magnitude were observed. Glass et al. observed similar behavior with hydrophobically modified HEC polymers. [100] The low-shear viscosity of hydrophobically modified HEC showed a maximum at the CMC of sodium oleate. HEUR thickeners showed the same type of behavior with both anionic (SDS) and nonionic surfactants. At the critical micelle concentration, the micelles can effectively cross-link the associating polymer if more than one hydrophobe from different polymer chains is incorporated into a micelle. Above the CMC, the number of micelles per polymer-bound hydrophobe increases, and the micelles can no longer effectively cross-link the polymer. As a result, viscosity diminishes. [Pg.660]

Most of the results reported herein on the sorption of polycations by natural keratins have been obtained on simplified model systems. The rationale behind such an approach was to seek to determine the fate of sorbing polymer under well-defined conditions and so to obtain mechanistic insight. The results have clearly indicated that both adsorption and absorption processes can occur. They have also shown that the nature, extent, and consequences of polycation sorption can all be influenced by the presence of surfactant. In general, nonionic surfactants have a small effect on sorption, because of low interaction while cationic surfactants can have a very large effect because of competition for the sorption sites. Because of interaction and complex formation with cationic polyelectrolytes anionic surfactants can exercise an intermediate, but potentially very important, influence. [Pg.516]

The interaction between ionic polymers and nonionic surfactants has not received as much attention as the other cases discussed in the preceding sections. Much of the earlier research in this area has been focused on the interaction of anionic polymeric acids with nonionic surfactants of polyethylene oxide. The polyethylene oxide has shown the ability to form hydrogen bonds with polymeric acid like polycarboxylic acid in water. This canses a redaction in the solution viscosity as the polymer chains tend to shrink. Saito and Taniguchi (1973) studied the interaction of polyacrylic acid with a series of nonionic surfactants (EO) RE in which EO is ethylene oxide, R is hydrocarbon group, and E represents ether. They reported that the interaction in this system is a function of the nature of the hydrophobic moiety (R) and the length of the hydrophilic tail (EO). [Pg.671]

Using steady-state absorption studies, several other authors examined the micropolarity of confined IL in microemulsions stabilized by ionic surfactants [64,85,87], For example, Sarkar and coworkers examined [bmim][BF ]/benzene mixtures stabilized by the anionic SAIL surfactant [bmim][AOT] and observed that, within the studied range, the A for solubilized MO continued to undergo redshift with increasing R [85, 87], In another work, Falcone and coworkers compared the micropolarities of [bmim][BF4]/benzene mixtures stabilized by cationic BHDC and nonionic TX-lOO surfactants using l-methyl-8-oxyquinolinium betaine (QB), a dye that locates mainly at the surfactant interfacial layer [64]. When [bmim][BF ] was added to both BHDC/benzene and TX-lOO/benzene systems, a larger hypsochromic shift was sensed by the probe in the former. This implies that the local environments in BHDC/benzene system are more polar. The authors ascribed this phenomenon to the strong electrostatic interactions between the [BFJ anion and the BHD moiety of the cationic surfactant. [Pg.381]


See other pages where Anionic-nonionic surfactant systems interactions is mentioned: [Pg.141]    [Pg.12]    [Pg.287]    [Pg.480]    [Pg.250]    [Pg.256]    [Pg.178]    [Pg.201]    [Pg.18]    [Pg.20]    [Pg.74]    [Pg.184]    [Pg.223]    [Pg.197]    [Pg.435]    [Pg.468]    [Pg.503]    [Pg.477]    [Pg.150]    [Pg.211]    [Pg.615]    [Pg.637]    [Pg.766]    [Pg.331]    [Pg.30]    [Pg.347]    [Pg.349]    [Pg.354]    [Pg.242]    [Pg.170]    [Pg.48]    [Pg.199]    [Pg.200]    [Pg.209]    [Pg.220]    [Pg.349]    [Pg.389]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.160 ]




SEARCH



Anion- interactions

Anionic interactions

Anionic surfactants

Anionic system

Anionic-nonionic surfactant systems

Interacting system

Interaction surfactant

Interaction system

Nonionic surfactants

Nonionic/anionic surfactants

Nonionizing

Surfactant systems

Surfactants Nonionics

© 2024 chempedia.info