Analytical techniques refractive index

Thin-layer chromatography (TLC) is used both for characterization of alcohol sulfates and alcohol ether sulfates and for their analysis in mixtures. This technique, combined with the use of scanning densitometers, is a quantitative analytical method. TLC is preferred to HPLC in this case as anionic surfactants do not contain strong chromophores and the refractive index detector is of low sensitivity and not suitable for gradient elution. A recent development in HPLC detector technology, the evaporative light-scattering detector, will probably overcome these sensitivity problems. 

Most compounds can be detected directly as they are able to produce a direct analytical signal. Photometric detection, especially UV (including diode array and multi-wavelength UV detection) is by far the most frequently applied detection technique. The application of mass spectrometry (MS) detection in CE is attractive as it can provide structural information [44]. Hologram-based refractive index detection [45] and electrochemical detection [46,47] were also reported. Conductivity [41,48-50] and amperometric [51,52] detection has shown to have advantages for the analysis of both organic and inorganic compounds. 

Part—IV has been entirely devoted to various Optical Methods that find their legitimate recognition in the arsenal of pharmaceutical analytical techniques and have been spread over nine chapters. Refractometry (Chapter 18) deals with refractive index, refractivity, critical micelle concentration (CMC) of various important substances. Polarimetry (Chapter 19) describes optical rotation and specific optical rotation of important pharmaceutical substances. Nephelometry and turbidimetry (Chapter 20) have been treated with sufficient detail with typical examples of chloroetracyclin, sulphate and phosphate ions. Ultraviolet and absorption spectrophotometry (Chapter 21) have been discussed with adequate depth and with regard to various vital theoretical considerations, single-beam and double-beam spectrophotometers besides typical examples amoxycillin trihydrate, folic acid, glyceryl trinitrate tablets and stilbosterol. Infrared spectrophotometry (IR) (Chapter 22) essentially deals with a brief introduction of group-frequency... 

Matrix effects in the analysis of nutrients in seawater are caused by differences in background electrolyte composition and concentration (salinity) between the standard solutions and samples. This effect causes several methodological difficulties. First, the effect of ionic strength on the kinetics of colorimetric reactions results in color intensity changes with matrix composition and electrolyte concentration. In practice, analytical sensitivity depends upon the actual sample matrix. This effect is most serious in silicate analysis using the molybdenum blue method. Second, matrix differences can also cause refractive index interference in automated continuous flow analysis, the most popular technique for routine nutrient measurement. To deal with these matrix effects, seawater of... 

Typically, sample detection in electromigration techniques is performed by on-column detection, employing a small part of the capillary as the detection cell where a property of either the analyte, such as UV absorbance, or the solution, such as refractive index or conductivity, is monitored. This section briefly describes the major detection modalities employed in capillary electromigration techniques, which are accomplished using UV-visible absorbance, fluorescence spectroscopy, and electrochemical systems. The hyphenation of capillary electromigration techniques with spectroscopic techniques employed for identification and structural elucidation of the separated compounds is also described. 

Other detection modes employed in capillary electromigration techniques include chemiluminescence [69-71], Raman spectroscopy [72,73], refractive index [74,75], photothermal absorbance [76,77], and radioisotope detection [78]. Some of these detection modes have found limited use due to their high specificity, which restricts the area of application and the analytes that can be detected, such as radioisotope and Raman-based detection that are specific for radionuclides and polarizable molecules, respectively. On the other hand, the limited use of more universal detection modes, such as refractive index, is either due to the complexity of coupling them to capillary electromigration techniques or to the possibility of detecting the analytes of interest with comparable sensitivity by one of the less problematic detection modes described above. 

Since the development of HPLC as a separation technique, considerable effort has been spent on the design and improvement of suitable detectors. The detector is perhaps the second-most important component of an HPLC system, after the column that performs the actual separation it would be pointless to perform any separation without some means of identifying the separated components. To this end, a number of analytical techniques have been employed to examine either samples taken from a fraction collector or the column effluent itself. Although many different physical principles have been examined for their potential as chromatography detectors, only four main types of detectors have obtained almost universal application, namely, ultraviolet (UV) absorbance, refractive index (RI), fluorescence, and conductivity detectors. Today, these detectors are used in about 80% of all separations. Newer varieties of detector such as the laser-induced fluorescence (LIE), electrochemical (EC), evaporative light scattering (ELS), and mass spectrometer (MS) detectors have been developed to meet the demands set by either specialized analyses or by miniaturization. 

Model particle mobility has been determinated with the Tiselius method (Tiselius, 1937, 1938). This method also allows the integration of the mobility of a large number of particles even if the refractive index is very close to that of the electrolyte medium, allowing to minimize the experimental errors inherent to the classical microelectrophoretic techniques. The electrophoretic mobilities will not be transformed into surface charges because the theoretical relationship between these parameters is highly dependant on the particle radius of curvature and the electrolyte concentration in the vicinity of the particle (Hunter and Wright, 1971). For both methods, the analytical error falls below 5 %, however, it increases up to 10 % for natural composite samples and/or low mobilities. 

---