Interference refractive index

For thin-film samples, abrupt changes in refractive indices at interfrees give rise to several complicated multiple reflection effects. Baselines become distorted into complex, sinusoidal, fringing patterns, and the intensities of absorption bands can be distorted by multiple reflections of the probe beam. These artifacts are difficult to model realistically and at present are probably the greatest limiters for quantitative work in thin films. Note, however, that these interferences are functions of the complex refractive index, thickness, and morphology of the layers. Thus, properly analyzed, useful information beyond that of chemical bonding potentially may be extracted from the FTIR speara. 

A more difficult criterion to meet with flow markers is that the polymer samples not contain interferents that coelute with or very near the flow marker and either affect its retention time or the ability of the analyst to reproducibly identify the retention time of the peak. Water is a ubiquitous problem in nonaqueous GPC and, when using a refractive index detector, it can cause a variable magnitude, negative area peak that may coelute with certain choices of totally permeated flow markers. This variable area negative peak may alter the apparent position of the flow marker when the flow rate has actually been invariant, thereby causing the user to falsely adjust data to compensate for the flow error. Similar problems can occur with the elution of positive peaks that are not exactly identical in elution to the totally permeated flow marker. Species that often contribute to these problems are residual monomer, reactants, surfactants, by-products, or buffers from the synthesis of the polymer. 

A characteristic dependence of the efficiency on the thickness of the active layer has also been observed for single layer polymer LEDs. This effect has been attributed to reflection of the EL light at the mirror-like metal electrodes resulting in characteristic interference maxima and minima depending on the thickness of the active layer and its refractive index [116). 

What is a coating on a substrate It is a thin layer, of a stack of thin layers, made of materials with a refraction index different from that of the substrate. Part of the light is reflected at each interface between the layers or between air and the first layer or between the last one and the substrate. Reflected beams interfere so that for a given wavelength and a given thickness, reflected light can be either canceled out or maximized. It corresponds to maximum transmission or reflectivity of the layer respectively. These materials and their indexes are chosen in order to fit as close as possible the specifications for the final coated optics. 

The resolution of the instrument in the vertical direction depends upon the wavelength of visible light (450 to 850 nm), the oil refractive index, and the difference between the maximum and the minimum interference intensity as follows [5,18] ... 

Fig. 8—Resolution of film thickness versus optical interference intensity [4,5], (a) different wavelengths, (b) different refractive indexes.

Fraunhofer rules do not include the influence of refraction, reflection, polarization and other optical effects. Early Iziser particle analyzers used Fraunhofer approximations because the computers of that time could not handle the storage cuid memory requirements of the Mie method. For example, it has been found that the Fraunhofer-based instrumentation cannot be used to measure the particle size of a suspension of lactose (R.I. = 1.533) in iso-octane (R.I. = 1.391) because the relative refractive index is 1.10, i.e.- 1.533/1.391. This is due to the fact that diffraction of light passing through the particles is nearly the same as that passing around the particles, creating a combined interference pattern which is not indicative of the true... 

If measurements are made in thin oxide films (of thickness less than 5 nm), at highly polished Al, within a small acceptance angle (a < 5°), well-defined additional maxima and minima in excitation (PL) and emission (PL and EL) spectra appear.322 This structure has been explained as a result of interference between monochromatic electromagnetic waves passing directly through the oxide film and EM waves reflected from the Al surface. In a series of papers,318-320 this effect has been explored as a means for precise determination of anodic oxide film thickness (or growth rate), refractive index, porosity, mean range of electron avalanches, transport numbers, etc. 

---