Analytical methods protocols

OSHA, Sampling and Analytical Methods—Protocols for Methods Evaluation (http //www. osha-slc.gov/dts/sltc/methods/index.html). 

Accuracy is the term used to describe the degree of deviation (bias) between the (often unknown) true value and what is found by means of a given analytical method. Accuracy cannot be determined by statistical means the test protocol must be devised to include the necessary comparisons (blanks, other methods). 

A protocol must be established and followed for sample preparation, labeling, packaging, shipping, and chain-of-custody procedures. Also, the volume of the samples will be specified by the analytical laboratory depending on the analytical methods to be used and the desired sensitivity. Accordingly, principal attention will be given here to the sampling methods, preparation of the samples for analysis, and QA/QC aspects of both. 

Non-NADA methods may be designed to detect multiple residues and they may be designed for use in multiple species. In order to validate these multi-residue methods, modifications to the validation protocol relative to single analyte methods are made. Additional laboratories will participate in the method trial, but the number of samples... 

If analytical methods are validated in inter-laboratory validation studies, documentation should follow the requirements of the harmonized protocol of lUPAC. " However, multi-matrix/multi-residue methods are applicable to hundreds of pesticides in dozens of commodities and have to be validated at several concentration levels. Any complete documentation of validation results is impossible in that case. Some performance characteristics, e.g., the specificity of analyte detection, an appropriate calibration range and sufficient detection sensitivity, are prerequisites for the determination of acceptable trueness and precision and their publication is less important. The LOD and LOQ depend on special instmmentation, analysts involved, time, batches of chemicals, etc., and cannot easily be reproduced. Therefore, these characteristics are less important. A practical, frequently applied alternative is the publication only of trueness (most often in terms of recovery) and precision for each analyte at each level. No consensus seems to exist as to whether these analyte-parameter sets should be documented, e.g., separately for each commodity or accumulated for all experiments done with the same analyte. In the latter case, the applicability of methods with regard to commodities can be documented in separate tables without performance characteristics. 

Residue study protocols typically either include quality specifications for analytical procedures or refer to a written analytical method that includes such specifications. The protocol for an LSMBS should also include analytical quality specifications, either directly or by reference to a method. Analytical specifications usually include minimum and maximum recovery of analyte from fortified control samples, minimum number of such fortifications per set of samples, minimum linearity in calibration, minimum stability of response to injection of calibration solutions, and limits of quantitation and of detection. 

Although elemental analysis (i.e. the determination of elements ranging from H to U) in a polymeric material is very common practice in the polymer industry, among polymer processors, research and application laboratories, and end-users, the analytical methods and protocols used are widely different and are not harmonised within the EC, let alone worldwide. Among the currently established 344 ISO methods for plastics, there are no ISO-approved methods available for... 

One aspect of specimen analysis that often occurs and should be highlighted is the situation that arises when a study has been initiated (protocol has been signed), but the analytical procedure has not yet been determined or worked out, or perhaps has not been fully validated by the performing laboratory. In this case, the approved protocol should fully describe the situation, and once the method has been developed and/or validated an approved protocol amendment should be issued, thus formalizing the inclusion of the analytical methodology. Likewise, during the validation process or during the study itself, if there is an analytical method modification then the protocol also needs to be formally amended. 

It is recommended that the protocol itself contain language that allows for minor modifications of an analytical method or procedure without necessitating an amendment (or a deviation) for example, "Minor modifications in instrumental parameters and/or adjustments in technique may be made in the method during specimen analysis to enhance overall efficiency or the sensitivity, specificity, or selectivity of analyte response."... 

The industry task forces (ARTF, ORETF, and others) are generating model protocols, efficient and accurate methods of sample collection, and analytical methods of appropriate detectability for use in field-worker exposure studies. Subsequently, the task forces are conducting field studies that will generate data for inclusion in several generic databases. It is understood that the databases will be the property of the member companies who have financed the work of the task forces. It is hoped, however, that the task forces will see fit to publish their protocols, methods, study designs, and other useful information in a volume like this one so that other scientists working in this discipline may access the information. 

For standardised instrumental analytical methods, i.e. biomarkers, biosensors and bioassays, there are well-established standard protocols on the national level, e.g. under Association Francaise de Normalisation (AFNOR), British Standard Institute (BSI), DIN (German Organisation for Standardisation), etc., and all those standards are formed by ISO-Working Groups and by validation studies into ISO - and CEN - Standards. Normal accredited and well-qualified laboratories should be able to perform the monitoring. 

The protocols of analytical methods and bioassays include the sampling and preparation steps of the test matrix before the test procedures. The sampling should be conducted in accordance with ISO 5667-16. There are already available harmonised protocols according to Hansen et al. [49]. The statistics of the ecotoxicity data should be conducted in accordance with ISO/CD 20281. 

Elsewhere in The Chemistry of Functional Groups series appears a brief discussion on the stages in the lifetime of chemicals2. Organotin compounds are usually very toxic and they constitute a potential source of harmful pollution with both acute and longterm effects. Increasing concern with environmental and occupational issues has also contributed to the development of analytical methods. Table 1 lists organotin compounds that have found industrial application with references to occupational protection protocols where analytical methods for the particular compound can be found. 

Smith, D.B., Woodruff, L.G., O Leary, R.M., Cannon, W.F., Garrett, R.G., Kilburn, J.E., Goldhaber, M. B. 2009. Pilot studies for the North American Soil Geochemical Landscapes Project - site selection, sampling protocols, analytical methods, and quality control. Applied Geochemistry, in press. 

It is important to emphasize that the Ts of a given sample is not a unique value, but rather depends on the analytical method and protocol employed, as well as a complete description of the sample, its composition (e.g., moisture content), and its history (i.e., under what conditions was it made... 

LC is currently used extensively in the photographic industry. One application is to quantify some of the components of photographic paper. As demands to reduce analysis time increase, an analytical method that can give improved productivity is required. One possible alternative to LC is capillary electrochromatography (CEC). In a recent paper, this analytical protocol was applied to separate some color photographic paper components <2002MI1>. 

This book covers all of the most recent (at the time of writing) developments in the field of solid support oligosaccharide synthesis. Included are chapters discussing different synthetic strategies, glycosylation protocols, the use of solid supports versus soluble polymeric supports and on-resin analytical methods. Special topics such as the formation of [3-glycosidic linkages on solid support are also discussed. 

---