Analytical competence

Another commonly used ELISA format is the immobilized antibody assay or direct competitive assay (Eigure 3). The primary anti-analyte antibody is immobilized on the solid phase and the analyte competes with a known amount of enzyme-labeled hapten for binding sites on the immobilized antibody. Eirst, the anti-analyte antibody is adsorbed on the microtiter plate wells. In the competition step, the analyte and enzyme-labeled hapten are added to microtiter plate wells and unbound materials are subsequently washed out. The enzyme substrate is then added for color production. Similarly to indirect competitive immunoassay, absorption is inversely proportional to the concentration of analyte. The direct competitive ELISA format is commonly used in commercial immunoassay test kits. 

The key appreciation here is the difference between technique expertise and analytical competence. While retaining the necessary expertise on individual techniques, understanding of the customer questions and aims (the problem setting) is paramount. Understanding of the strengths, weaknesses and... 

Monitoring of the analytical competency of individual staff members. 

This type of approach is essentially non-competitive and usually requires the use of two monoclonal antibodies directed against two distinct epitopes on the analyte. Other devices have employed a two-stage competitive system in which analyte and labelled analyte compete for antibody in one part of the device. This is followed by transfer of the equilibrium mixture to a separate part of the device where membrane-immobilized antibody removes the unbound labelled material and allows the bound to go through the membrane into the absorbent pad. 

Many dyes complex with their primary analyte due to attractive forces such as ionic charges. These charges are susceptible to nonspecific complexation with interfering analytes with characteristics similar to those of the primary analyte. Both the primary and interfering analytes compete for complexation with the same site. The NIR dyes may be synthesized with specific functional groups that will bond more specifically to an analyte. For instance, an isothiocyanate group forms very stable thiourea chemical bonds with proteins or an amino-modified DNA oligomer. The introduction of more specific and reversible functionalities on the dye molecule should minimize the interference of extraneous molecules or ions. 

The competitive assay is another format used to quantitate an analyte. An unlabeled analyte competes with a labeled analyte (enzyme-conjugated molecule) for binding to a specific capture antibody (Figure 11.1c). 

The principle behind the test method(s) is that antibodies are made of proteins that recognize and bind with foreign substances (antigens) that invade host animals. Synthetic antibodies have been developed to complex with petroleum constituents. The antibodies are immobilized on the walls of a special ceU or filter membrane. Water samples are added directly to the cell, while soils must be extracted before analysis. A known amount of labeled analyte (typically, an enzyme with an affinity for the antibody) is added after the sample. The sample analytes compete with the enzyme-labeled analytes for sites on the antibodies. After equilibrium is established, the cell is washed to remove any um-eacted sample or labeled enzyme. Color development reagents that react with the labeled enzyme are added. A solution that stops color development is added at a specified time, and the optical density (color intensity) is measured. Because the coloring agent reacts with the labeled enzyme, samples with high optical density contain low concentrations of analytes. Concentration is inversely proportional to optical density. 

Analysis of a material by a small number of laboratories using the same method runs the risk of introducing a method bias into the result. At least 20 laboratories are chosen for their high standard of analytical competence and their ability to apply different methods, where this is appropriate. If necessary the laboratories will also be asked to use different pretreatment methods. 

Immunosensors have been designed which use both direct and indirect immunoassay technology to detect specific analytes within a minute or less in a variety of matrices (see Fig. 9). Indirect immunosensors may employ ELA, FLA, or CLIA principles whereby enzyme-, fluorophore- or chemiluminescent-labeled analyte competes with the target (nonlabeled) analyte for binding sites on the immobilized antibody. Unbound (free) labeled analyte is then quantitated using an electrochemical, optical, or electromechanical transducer and compared to the amount of target analyte in the sample. 

Competitive MIP-ILAs are based on the first configuration the analyte competes with a labeled derivative for the specific binding sites of the imprinted polymer prepared in the form of beads or thin films. 

Fig. 10 Schematic representation of the two approaches mainly used in EzILAs. (a) The enzyme conjugate and the analyte compete for the selective binding sites of the polymer finally, a substrate is converted into a product that generates a chemical signal (e.g., fluorescence, absorbance, electrochemical) at a rate which is proportional to the amount of bound enzyme and hence to the concentration of analyte in the sample, (b) Direct assay where the analyte is the enzyme which is quantified by a coupled enzymatic reaction...

Biological matrices can vary substantially from each other. Most, however, contain various amounts of interfering elements, salts and oxides, making them potentially problematic to analyze. It may therefore be argued that almost any biological sample matrix, to some degree, is a test of the laboratory s analytical competence. 

The enzyme immunoassay (EIA) applies a single antibody to measure small molecules. The assay works on the principle that two antigens, enzyme-labeled and unlabeled analytes, compete for binding to the limited number of binding sites on the primary antibody, which is subsequently bound to the immobilized anti-IgG. The amount of labeled antigen bound is inversely proportional to the amount of unlabeled antigen (e.g., a cytokine) present in the sample (S7). 

Analyte and analyte tracer (structurally similar to analyte, mostly 125I-analyte) compete for a small... 

The equilibrium constant, K, thermodynamically could be described as the exponent of the Gibbs free energy of the analyte s competitive interactions with the stationary phase. In hquid chromatography the analyte competes with the eluent for the place on the stationary phase, and resulting energy responsible for the analyte retention is actually the difference between the analyte interaction with the stationary phase and the eluent interactions for the stationary phase as shown in equation (1-5)... 

Two models have been proposed to describe the process of retention in liquid chromatography (Figure 3.3), the solvent-interaction model (Scott and Kucera, 1979) and the solvent-competition model (Snyder, 1968 and 1983). Both these models assume the existence of a monolayer or multiple layers of strong mobile-phase molecules adsorbed onto the surface of the stationary phase. In the solvent-partition model the analyte is partitioned between the mobile phase and the layer of solvent adsorbed onto the stationary-phase surface. In the solvent-competition model, the analyte competes with the strong mobile-phase molecules for active sites on the stationary phase. The two models are essentially equivalent because both assume that interactions between the analyte and the stationary phase remain constant and that retention is determined by the composition of the mobile phase. Furthermore, elutropic series, which rank solvents and mobile-phase modifiers according to their affinities for stationary phases (e.g. Table 3.1), have been developed on the basis of experimental observations, which cannot distinguish the two models of retention. 

Where the unlabeled antigen (the analyte) competes for antibody binding sites with the solid phase antigen. This approach may have some difficulties caused by the requirement for purification of the immunospecific antibody. Because monoclonal antibodies are produced as essentially immunospecifically pure populations, they are ideal for labeled antibody techniques. 

In principle, immunoassays with labelled compounds can be carried out in the following ways, (a) In competitive assays, the labelled analyte competes with the unlabelled analyte for the epitope-binding site of the antibody. The key feature of a competitive assay is that maximal assay sensitivity is attained... 

Fig. 9.6. Direct competitive immunoassay with immobilized antibodies-. The analyte competes with a labelled analyte derivative ( tracer ) for a limited amount of antibodybinding sites (1) until equilibrium (2) is established. Then, the excess of analyte and tracer (3) are removed by washing of the solid support, and the fraction bound to the antibody is detected (4).

Chemiluminescent labels may also be used in labeled-antigen (competitive) assays. The antigen (analyte) competes with the labeled analyte for immobilized antibody, and, following a rinse step, reagents are added to generate chemiluminescence from the labels. 

The pioneering work in chromatography was based on adsorption of analyte species on a solid surface. Here, the stationary phase is the surface of a finely divided polar solid. With such a packing, the analyte competes with the mobile phase for sites on the surface of the packing, and retention is the result of adsorption forces. 

FIGURE 2 Detection mechanisms in SPR-based sensors. (A) Direct assay direct detection of analyte. (B) Competitive assay analyte competes with an internal standard. (C) Sandwich assay analyte is trapped between two antibodies. (D) Inhibition assay analyte is pretreated with an antibody. 

The analyte competes with electroactive species blocking of modifying their electrochemical response (competitive methods). 

Scheller et al. (1987c) described a substrate competition electrode for the determination of aniline and phenol (Fig. 94). The analyte competes with hydroquinone for the pseudo-peroxidatic activity of hemoglobin. The decrease of the electrochemical reduction current of benzoquinone in the presence of the alternative substrate served as the measuring signal. 

With limited amount of Ab, the unlabeled antigen (analyte) competes with the labeled antigen Ag for limited binding sites. Bound fraction (AgAb) is separated from free (Ab), and the signal [Ag Ab] complex (the Ab fraction not occupied by the analyte) is measured. The amount of analyte is inversely proportional to the bound [Ag Ab] complex in a hyperbolic function as in Fig. 1. Methods for transforming or linearizing these functions are presented in the section on data reduction (Sec. V). 

Competitive assays, as seen in Fig. 5b, are based on two analytes competing for the same recognition site at the sensor surface. One of the analytes is free and the other is typically conjugated to a larger protein, usually bovine serum albumin or casein. The concentration of the conjugated analyte is fixed from solution to solution. The two analytes are mixed in a solution and passed across the sensing surface. The sensor response will be inversely proportional to the concentration of analyte in the target solution. 

The subject has been reviewed on a number of occasions over the past ten years and the reader is referred to these articles for general overviews [3-8], as well as more specialist discussions of antibody techniques for specific plant hormones, viz, cytokinins [9,10], abscisic acid [11], gibberellins [12,13] and auxins [14]. The basis of all immunological techniques is, of course, the availability of antibodies of high specificity for the substance of interest. High specificity is necessary to reduce, or ideally eliminate, the possibility of false results due to cross-reacting substances present in the analyte competing for the... 

---