Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Aluminum test results

Fig. 9. Wedge test results of aluminum adherends with the following surface preparations FPL, PAA, and FPL followed by an NTMP treatment. Adapted from Ref. [42]. Fig. 9. Wedge test results of aluminum adherends with the following surface preparations FPL, PAA, and FPL followed by an NTMP treatment. Adapted from Ref. [42].
Fig. 20. Wedge test results showing PAA, CAA, and BSAA treated aluminum bonds. (Note that this test involved thicker adherends than is typical and therefore crack lengths cannot be compared to those of other tests.)... Fig. 20. Wedge test results showing PAA, CAA, and BSAA treated aluminum bonds. (Note that this test involved thicker adherends than is typical and therefore crack lengths cannot be compared to those of other tests.)...
Plasticized PVC is tested by covering both sides of the pigmented test sheet with white plasticized PVC films, which are placed between glass or aluminum plates. With a certain weight on it, this sandwich is exposed for 24 hours at a temperature of 80°C (or for 15 hours at 100°C) [41], The thickness of the test sample does not affect the test results. [Pg.66]

Experimental test results for molten aluminum-water RPTs are described in Section V. Also shown is a tabulation of most documented aluminum-water explosive boiling incidents (see Table XIV). In many accidents, the quantity of water was quite small, e.g., some resulted when wet aluminum ingots were loaded into melting furnaces containing molten aluminum. In contrast, one notes that few, if any, serious events have ever been obtained when small quantities of aluminum were contacted with a large mass of water. Since laboratory tests were often carried out in the latter fashion, most of these have produced negative results. [Pg.110]

Results from extensive test programs on molten aluminum-water explosions have been reported by Long (1957), by Hess and Brondyke (1969), and by Hess et al. (1980). In almost all experiments, molten aluminum, usuaUy 23 kg, was dropped into water from a crucible with a bottom tap (see Fig. 9). In only a few tests was there instrumentation to indicate temperatures, pressures, delay times, etc. The test results were normally reported as nonexplosive or explosive—and if the latter, qualitative comments were provided on the severity of the event. A large number of parameters were varied, and several preventative schemes were tested. Over 1500 experiments were conducted. Some of the key results are summarized below. ... [Pg.162]

Figure 5. Wedge test results for inhibitor-treated SAA 7075-T6 aluminum specimens. Figure 5. Wedge test results for inhibitor-treated SAA 7075-T6 aluminum specimens.
The ionic phosphonates like NTMP are effective hydration inhibitors because they can form an insoluble complex with the oxide surface. They are useful as epoxy adhesive couplers in cases where the adhesive and its curing cycle are compatible with the adsorbed phosphonate molecule. (14) Wedge test results indicate that in two epoxy-aluminum systems studied, certain organosilanes tend to both increase the epoxy-metal bond durability and maintain hydration resistance. The results of anodic polarization experiments further suggest that these silane films are effective against localized pitting. [Pg.248]

Although the panel with the plasma deposited film followed by priming with E-coat is visually better, the use of the corrosion width provides a method for quantifying the improvement in the corrosion performance. Also the factor of about 2 difference in corrosion width between the two chromate conversion-coated panels is difficult to obtain from the qualitative difference observed from the scanned images. It can be seen from this comparison of three panels that the use of the measured corrosion width makes the differentiation of corrosion performance much easier. This method of evaluating corrosion test results is used to determine if the combination of the two bests could indeed yield the better corrosion protection of aluminum alloys. [Pg.575]

Table 32.5 shows the adhesion test results for the same spray primers applied to T/F plasma-treated IVD Al-coated 7075-T6 alloys. The DC T/F plasma-treated IVD aluminum panels also gave strong adhesion to subsequent spray paints. The spray paints could not be removed from the IVD Al oated A1 substrates with the Turco solution. [Pg.696]

At Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, armor-piercing incendiary and fragment simulator bullets were fired into aluminum storage tanks containing both kerosene and liquid hydrogen. The test results indicated that the liquid hydrogen was safer than conventional aviation kerosene. [Pg.29]

To design WPC soundwalls capable of holding against a more intense wind (see Table 7.51), wood, steel, and aluminum post inserts were tested. Results of some of these tests are shown in Table 7.52. [Pg.284]

The lap shear fatigue test for the joints of the front cab module of the Maglev Transrapid TR08 has been analyzed by a fine detail analysis with 3D solid elements using the real cross-section geometry. The adherend materials are aluminum on one side and GRP on the other see also Section 32.5.1. The PU adhesive Sikaflex -254 Booster is modeled with the Ogden strain energy equation (Eq. (1), with N=2). The computed stiffness correlates well with the test results. The local stress distribution is visualized in Fig. 32.11. [Pg.533]

In this paper, we have presented test results of two methods of adhesion improvement on a specific aluminum alloy and a stainless steel. The methods are based on flame pyrolysis of silane precursors and a laser pretreatment in connection with a primer. While the first method seems to be most favorable for steel surfaces, the latter gives good results on both aluminum and steel. Both methods are well suited for application in the railroad industry since they are effective under atmospheric conditions and are therefore promising for integration in an automated production line. [Pg.553]

The friction joint has been tested using a shaft on a bush friction machine with 2cm friction area, 0.35 MPa load and 2.4 m/s sliding velocity. A 40-mm-diameter shaft has been made of a carbon steel of 40-45 HRC hardness and 0.8-1.0 xm surface roughness. The outer bush material was aluminum, the inner was copper, the polymer layer was 200-p.m-thick PVB. A 0.1 N solution of NaCl was fed into the friction zone, the wear rate was determined by weighing. The test results are presented in Table 4.7. [Pg.291]


See other pages where Aluminum test results is mentioned: [Pg.961]    [Pg.42]    [Pg.45]    [Pg.111]    [Pg.245]    [Pg.324]    [Pg.332]    [Pg.575]    [Pg.807]    [Pg.121]    [Pg.121]    [Pg.324]    [Pg.103]    [Pg.590]    [Pg.679]    [Pg.700]    [Pg.703]    [Pg.324]    [Pg.303]    [Pg.163]    [Pg.545]    [Pg.873]    [Pg.147]    [Pg.148]    [Pg.55]    [Pg.60]    [Pg.65]    [Pg.72]    [Pg.418]    [Pg.139]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.214 ]




SEARCH



Test result

Testing results

© 2024 chempedia.info