Radicals alkyl, structure

For a long time, this knowledge on carbon-centred radicals has driven the analysis of spectroscopic data obtained for silicon-centred (or silyl) radicals, often erroneously. The principal difference between carbon-centred and silyl radicals arises from the fact that the former can use only 2s and 2p atomic orbitals to accommodate the valence electrons, whereas silyl radicals can use 3s, 3p and 3d. The topic of this section deals mainly with the shape of silyl radicals, which are normally considered to be strongly bent out of the plane (a-type structure 2) [1]. In recent years, it has been shown that a-substituents have had a profound influence on the geometry of silyl radicals and the rationalization of the experimental data is not at all an extrapolation of the knowledge on alkyl radicals. Structural information may be deduced by using chemical, physical or theoretical methods. For better comprehension, this section is divided in subsections describing the results of these methods. 

What is the reason for the ordering in stability of alkyl radicals To answer this question, we need to inspect the alkyl radical structure more closely. Consider the structure of the methyl radical, formed by removal of a hydrogen atom from methane. Spectroscopic measurements have shown that the methyl radical, and probably other alkyl radicals, adopts a nearly planar configuration, best described by sp hybridization (Figure 3-2). The unpaired electron occupies the remaining p orbital perpendicular to the molecular plane. 

Most organic free radicals have very short lifetimes, but certain structural features enhance stability. Radicals without special stabilization rapidly dimerize or disproportionate. The usual disproportionation process for alkyl radicals involves transfer of a hydrogen from the carbon P to the radical site, leading to formation of an alkane and an alkene ... 

EPR studies and other physieal methods have provided the basis for some insight into the detailed geometiy of radieal species.Deduetions about strueture ean also be drawn from the study of the stereoehemistiy of reactions involving radical intermediates. Several structural possibilities must be considered. If discussion is limited to alkyl radicals, the possibilities include a rigid pyramidal structure, rapidly inverting pyramidal structures, or a planar structure. 

The broad conclusion of all these studies is that alkyl radicals are shallow pyramids and that the barrier to inversion of the pyramidal structures is low. Radicals also are able to tolerate some geometric distortion associated with strained ring systems. 

The procedure used in the preceding sections for cyclopropane serves equally well in the analytic determination of the numbers of structure and stereoisomeric compounds which obtain when essentially different radicals of valence one or alkyl radicals are substituted in the basic compound. We have to assume, however, that there is enough information on the basic compound to determine the three groups discussed in Sec. 56. This is certainly the case for the most important basic compounds, benzene and naphthalene. I omit the formulation of rules which are obvious in the preceding example. 

The derivative obtains when the m pairs of H-atoms are replaced by alkyl radicals. The group of the structure formula (Sec. 56) is the direct product (Sec. 27) of m factors... 

Trisubstituted paraffins. A trisubstituted paraffin with three different substituents Y, T, Z (none of which can be an alkyl radical) has the molecular formula C Hj. XYZ. The structure formula is a tree. Examine the three linking paths YY, YZ, and ZX. It is easy to see that there exists one and only one point which is common to all three paths, a vertex of degree 4 (a C-atom) we call it "traffic center" of the tree, point V for short (F for "Verkehrszentrum"). 

In the realm of chemical enumeration we note Polya s equation (4.4) which gives the generating function for stereoisomers of the alkyl radicals, or equivalently, alcohols — that is, equation (5.2) of this article. His equation (4.3) gives the corresponding result for the structural isomers of these compounds. His equations (4.2) and (4.5) correspond, respectively, to the cases of alcohols without any asymmetric carbon atoms and the number of embeddings in the plane of structural formulae for alcohols in general. The latter problem is not chemically very significant. 

The rate of oxidation/reduction of radicals is strongly dependent on radical structure. Transition metal reductants (e.g. TiMt) show selectivity for electrophilic radicals (e.g. those derived by tail addition to acrylic monomers or alkyl vinyl ketones - Scheme 3.89) >7y while oxidants (CuM, Fe,M) show selectivity for nucleophilic radicals (e.g. those derived from addition to S - Scheme 3,90).18 A consequence of this specificity is that the various products from the reaction of an initiating radical with monomers will not all be trapped with equal efficiency and complex mixtures can arise. 

A mixture of water/pyridine appears to be the solvent of choice to aid carbenium ion formation [246]. In the Hofer-Moest reaction the formation of alcohols is optimized by adding alkali bicarbonates, sulfates [39] or perchlorates. In methanol solution the presence of a small amount of sodium perchlorate shifts the decarboxylation totally to the carbenium ion pathway [31]. The structure of the carboxylate can also support non-Kolbe electrolysis. By comparing the products of the electrolysis of different carboxylates with the ionization potentials of the corresponding radicals one can draw the conclusion that alkyl radicals with gas phase ionization potentials smaller than 8 e V should be oxidized to carbenium ions [8 c] in the course of Kolbe electrolysis. This gives some indication in which cases preferential carbenium ion formation or radical dimerization is to be expected. Thus a-alkyl, cycloalkyl [, ... 

There are two possible structures for simple alkyl radicals. They might have sp bonding, in which case the structure would be planar, with the odd electron in ap orbital, or the bonding might be sp, which would make the structure pyramidal and place the odd electron in an sp orbital. The ESR spectra of CHs and other simple alkyl radicals as well as other evidence indicate that these radicals have planar structures.This is in accord with the known loss of optical activity when a free radical is generated at a chiral carbon. In addition, electronic spectra of the CH3 and CD3 radicals (generated by flash photolysis) in the gas phase have definitely established that under these conditions the radicals are planar or near planar. The IR spectra of CH3 trapped in solid argon led to a similar conclusion. " °... 

The strained hydrocarbon [1,1,1] propellane is of special interest because of the thermodynamic and kinetic ease of addition of free radicals (R ) to it. The resulting R-substituted [ 1.1.1]pent-1-yl radicals (Eq. 3, Scheme 26) have attracted attention because of their highly pyramidal structure and consequent potentially increased reactivity. R-substituted [1.1.1]pent-1-yl radicals have a propensity to bond to three-coordinate phosphorus that is greater than that of a primary alkyl radical and similar to that of phenyl radicals. They can add irreversibly to phosphines or alkylphosphinites to afford new alkylphosphonites or alkylphosphonates via radical chain processes (Scheme 26) [63]. The high propensity of a R-substituted [1.1.1] pent-1-yl radical to react with three-coordinate phosphorus molecules reflects its highly pyramidal structure, which is accompanied by the increased s-character of its SOMO orbital and the strength of the P-C bond in the intermediate phosphoranyl radical. 

However, a comparison of the line shape of the observed spectra with spectra of methyl radicals (Fig. lib) clearly proves that the species present here are not methyl radicals. The EPR spectrum of a methyl radical is a quartet of lines. However, the observed spectrum, though dominated by a quartet structure, shows a couple of additional lines pointing to additional interactions of the unpaired electron. By comparing the observed line shape to other alkyl radicals it turned out that the present spectrum can be attributed to ethyl radicals. Figure 11c shows the EPR spectrum of ethyl radicals created in an ethylchloride matrix generated by photolysis for comparison [121]. 

From a synthetic point of view, the regioselectivity and stereoselectivity of the cyclization are of paramount importance. As discussed in Section 11.2.3.3 of Part A, the order of preference for cyclization of alkyl radicals is 5-exo > 6-endo 6-exo > 7-endo S-endo > 1-exo because of stereoelectronic preferences. For relatively rigid cyclic structures, proximity and alignment factors determined by the specific geometry of the ring system are of major importance. Theoretical analysis of radical addition indicates that the major interaction of the attacking radical is with the alkene LUMO.321 The preferred direction of attack is not perpendicular to the it system, but rather at an angle of about 110°. 

Methylation of [Co(tmt)]2+ with Mel leads to the potent methyl carbanion donor trans-[Co(tmt)Me2]+ (186). Reaction of this complex with variety of methyl-lead(IV) compounds in MeCN is rapid, leading to the same monomethylcobalt(III) product, but resulting in different methylated Pb derivatives depending on the reaction stoichiometry and Pb compound.839 The same complex rapidly transfers Me groups to Zn2+ and Cd2+ in MeCN,840 or Pb2+ and Sn2+ in water.302,841 The kinetics of Co—C bond formation in the reactions with primary alkyl and substituted primary alkyl radicals has been found to be influenced more by the structure of the macrocycle than by the nature of the radicals.842... 

The geometrical structure of most alkyl radicals is trigonal planar at the carbon having the unpaired electron. 

Traditionally, electron transfer processes in solution and at surfaces have been classified into outer-sphere and inner-sphere mechanisms (1). However, the experimental basis for the quantitative distinction between these mechanisms is not completely clear, especially when electron transfer is not accompanied by either atom or ligand transfer (i.e., the bridged activated complex). We wish to describe how the advantage of using organometals and alkyl radicals as electron donors accrues from the wide structural variations in their donor abilities and steric properties which can be achieved as a result of branching the alkyl moiety at either the a- or g-carbon centers. 

The important role of reaction enthalpy in the free radical abstraction reactions is well known and was discussed in Chapters 6 and 7. The BDE of the O—H bonds of alkyl hydroperoxides depends slightly on the structure of the alkyl radical D0 H = 365.5 kJ mol 1 for all primary and secondary hydroperoxides and P0—h = 358.6 kJ mol 1 for tertiary hydroperoxides (see Chapter 2). Therefore, the enthalpy of the reaction RjOO + RjH depends on the BDE of the attacked C—H bond of the hydrocarbon. But a different situation is encountered during oxidation and co-oxidation of aldehydes. As proved earlier, the BDE of peracids formed from acylperoxyl radicals is much higher than the BDE of the O—H bond of alkyl hydroperoxides and depends on the structure of the acyl substituent. Therefore, the BDEs of both the attacked C—H and O—H of the formed peracid are important factors that influence the chain propagation reaction. This is demonstrated in Table 8.9 where the calculated values of the enthalpy of the reaction RjCV + RjH for different RjHs including aldehydes and different peroxyl radicals are presented. One can see that the value A//( R02 + RH) is much lower in the reactions of the same compound with acylperoxyl radicals. 

The data described above proved that isomerization of alkyl and peroxyl radicals plays a very important role in polymer oxidation. They influence the composition of products of polymer oxidation including the structure of hydroperoxy groups. The competition between reactions of alkyl radical isomerization and addition of dioxygen appeared to be very important for the self-initiation and, hence, autoxidation of PP (see later). 

The decay of alkylsulfoxides was studied by the quantum-chemical and IPM methods [65]. These reactions are endothermic. The activation energy of the thermoneutral analog, Ee0, depends on the structure of the alkyl radical ... 

An alkyl radical and a nitroxide radical exist in an equlibrium with the corresponding alkoxyamine as their coupling product (Eq. 57). Moad and Rizzardo [213] and Kazmaier et al. [214] independently estimated the effects of the structure of the alkyl group and the nitroxide on the dissociation energy of various alkoxyamines into the radicals by semiempirical molecular orbital calculations. The bond dissociation energies determined are summarized in Table 5 ... 

Aryl radicals are much more reactive than alkyl radicals (k ca. 2 x 106M-1 s 1), and rather more reactive than cyclopropyl radicals (ca. 8 x 107) or vinyl radicals (ca. 3 x 10s). Fluoroalkyl radicals are also about 100 times more reactive than alkyl radicals, because of contributions from structures Rf 6 - H -4+SnR3 to the transition state. Singlet-excited acetone is twice as reactive as triplet-excited acetone, which shows a similar reactivity to that of the /-butoxyl radical (k ca. 2 x 108M-1 s-1). 

---