Added risk approach

The total risk approach accounts for the total dissolved metal in a water body, implying that no distinction is made between the ambient fraction of a metal in a water body and the added fraction (Lepper 2005). This approach can result in a standard below the natural background. Hence, a suggestion in the European Union to account for background is the added risk approach. It allows interpretation of the outcome of exposure and effects analysis or risk characterization in terms of the different fractions (i.e., the natural background [total metal]) and the anthropogenic fraction. 

Using the added risk approach (Crommentuijn et al. 2000), the amended EQS or maximum permissible concentration (MPC) is defined as follows ... 

The added risk approach is based on the assumption that the ecosystem is already adapted, and has developed, due to the background concentration at the site of interest, and the MPA reflects the anthropogenic addition that the system can tolerate before effects are seen. The flowchart in Figure 4.2 sets out the essentials of the added risk procedure. 

In principle, the added risk approach could be applied (in the European Union and Canada) to other substances, for example, natural steroidal estrogens from wildlife,... 

FIGURE 4.2 Summary of the added risk approach for dealing with background concentrations of metals. 

Crommentuijn T, Polder M, Sijm D, de Bruijn J, Van de Plassche E. 2000. Evaluation of the Dutch environmental risk limits for metals by application of the added risk approach. 

It must be emphasised that the above-mentioned approach could also be reversed. Indeed, if high Cbsite, dissolved levels are observed in comparison with the calculated reference EQStra, dissolved valne it could be more appropriate to apply the added risk approach (ARA) in the second tier. In that particular case, the added exposure concentrations at a particnlar site/region, Cara, dissolved, should be calculated from the Ctra, dissolved - Cbsite, dissolved- Compliance checking is then performed by comparison between Cara, dissolved and the reference EQSara, dissolved (i-C- reference EQStra, dissolved Cbcuiture medium, dissolved)- Tier 3 wonld then consist of the introdnc-tion of a bioavailability correction based on the added concentrations. 

Euras. 2006. Fact sheet 3 risk characterization, general aspects. MERAG program-building block, risk assessment, Annex 1, added versus total risk approach and its use in risk assessment and/or environmental quality setting. 

The robustness of a quality standard can be increased considerably by accounting for the bioavailability of the substance in an approach that is more accurate than use of added risk. The validation and implementation of international standards for such approaches is desirable. Bioavailable concentrations are influenced by the physical and chemical properties of a substance, soil characteristics, weather, and land use. Further efforts are necessary to gain understanding of the main regulating processes of availability and bioavailability to improve the prediction of risks for substances in soil and to derive more accurate SQS. 

Since the publication of these two early studies, a number of studies have adopted a more prospective cohort approach to the examination of statin use in patients who develop dementia and AD over the course of a set period (usually between 5-10yrs). While many of the subsequent studies described seemingly protective effects in cross-sectional case-control analysis [36,45-51], the majority of prospective cohort analysis failed to identify a reduced risk of dementia in incident cases of dementia or AD [36, 46,47,51[. One notable exception comes from a study that examined a population identified by common AD risk facfors and co-morbidities (e.g., first degree relatives) [52]. In a high AD risk population, statin use was associated with a lowered risk of AD [52]. A summary of the epidemiological findings for stafin use in AD are shown in Table 1. 

To meet the above challenges, two ftmdamental initiatives are under way, namely, shifts to reliability-centered maintenance and predictive maintenance. Broadly speaking, prior to the maintenance revolution, the utilities maintenance approach had essentially been one of preventive maintenance on all components after fixed time intervals, irrespective of the components criticality and actual condition. The shortcomings of this approach included the following (1) overly conservative maintenance requirements, (2) limited gains in reliability from investments in maintenance, (3) inadequate preventive maintenance on key components, and (4) added risk of worker exposure to radiation through unnecessary maintenance. Anticipated benefits of the revised approach are related not only to reduced maintenance costs but also to improved overall operational reliability. 

Our simulation work has identified a value-adding extension of this approach where if there are two alternative liabilities A and B, a prediction of the presence of A or B can select compounds for relatively early screening against either risk factor, leaving the other to be assessed later. For certain combinations of the ratios of costs of screening and prevalence for A and B,... 

When comparing different computational approaches to enzyme systems, several different factors have to be considered, e.g., differences in high-level (QM) method, QM/MM implementation, optimization method, model selection etc. This makes it very difficult to compare different QM/MM calculations on the same system. Even comparisons with an active-site model are not straightforward. It can be argued that adding a larger part of the system into calculaton always should make the calculation more accurate. At the same time, introducing more variables to the calculation also increases the risk of artificial effects. 

With these observations in mind, the simplest practical measure to reduce electrostatic discharge risks associated with vessel loading is to reduce the rate at which the dry solids are added to the vessel. This approach works because the slower rate of flow provides an opportunity for accumulating charge to relax away by various mechanisms before hazardous conditions become established. Often, the same type of flow limitation is effective in reducing the likelihood of ESD during vessel unloading. In many cases, the maximum safe rate of inflow (or outflow) has to be determined by empirical means. 

---