Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Activity function from experimental data

DETERMINATION OF NONELECTROLYTE ACTIVITIES AND EXCESS GIBBS FUNCTIONS FROM EXPERIMENTAL DATA... [Pg.385]

Although the potential energy functions can be made to reproduce thermodynamic solvation data quite well, they are not without problems. In some cases, the structure of the ion solvation shell, and in particular the coordination number, deviates from experimental data. The marked sensitivity of calculated thermodynamic data for ion pairs on the potential parameters is also a problem. Attempts to alleviate these problems by introducing polarizable ion-water potentials (which take into account the induced dipole on the water caused by the ion strong electric field) have been made, and this is still an active area of research. [Pg.146]

In another attempt (Fawcett and Tikenen, 1996), the introduction of a changing dielectric constant of the solvent (although taken from experimental data) as a function of concentration has been used to estimate activity coefficients of simple 1 1 electrolyte solutions for concentrations up to 2.5 mol dm". ... [Pg.326]

Uncertainties about the structure of the activated complex and the assumptions involved in computing its thermodynamic properties seriously limit the practical value of the theory. However, it does provide qualitative interpretation of how molecules react and a reassuring foundation for the empirical rate expressions inferred from experimental data. The effect of temperature on the frequency factor is extremely difficult to evaluate from rate measurements. This is because the strong exponential function in the Arrhenius equation effectively masks the temperature dependency of A. C. A. Eckert and M. Boudart, Chem. Eng. Sci., 18, 144 (1963). [Pg.51]

The primary parameter obtained from experimental data is generally the energy transfer rate. Experiments are usually made as a function of some variable such as temperature, activator concentration, time or pressure which yields the dependence of the transfer rate on the varied parameter. The properties of the transfer rate can be compared to the predictions of the various theoretical models discussed in the previous section to answer the questions outlined in the preceding paragraph. The fundamental step is thus analyzing the experimental results to obtain the energy transfer rate under the specific conditions of the experiment. [Pg.60]

To proceed, we need to consider whether the two chemicals we have chosen have sufficient solubility to be used, and how much of each would be needed to obtain a desired freezing-point depression. The two pieces of data we need are the solubility of the two compounds we have. chosen, and the activity coefficient of water in mixtures with these compounds as a function of composition at -25°C. The most reliable information is obtained from experimental data, and these should be obtained (from the literature or the laboratory) before a final decision is made. However, for a preliminary study of possible compounds, it is more common to use approximate predictive methods, such as UNIFAC, which we will do here. [Pg.697]

It is important to note that in the equation (6.19) G is excess Gibbs free energy. This function can be calculated accurately by means of liquid activity models. C is a constant depending on the particular type of EOS. Note also that in the mixing rules of Huron Vidal the parameters in the liquid activity model are not equal with those found at other pressures, and must be regressed again from experimental data. [Pg.186]

This relation indicates that the rate constant can be determined from a knowledge of the partition functions of the activated complex and the reactant species. For stable molecules or atoms the partition functions can be calculated from experimental data that do not require kinetic measurements. However, they do require that molecular constants such as the vibrational frequencies and moments of inertia be evaluated from spectroscopic data. Evaluation of the partition function for the activated complex Gxyz presents a more difficult problem, since the moments of inertia and vibrational frequencies required cannot be determined experimentally. However, theoretical calculations permit one to determine moments of inertia from the various internuclear distances and vibrational frequencies from the curvature of the potential energy surface in directions normal to the reaction coordinate. In practice, one seldom has available a sufficiently accurate potential energy surface for the reaction whose rate constant is to be determined. [Pg.102]

FIGURE 6.11 TCFIs for (a) water/water, (b) water/t-butanol, and (c) t-butanol/t-butanol obtained from simulation of water/t-butanol mixtures using the Verlet method (crosses) versus the water mole fraction Xj, compared with TCFIs obtained from experimental data nsing the Wooley/O Connell procedure, where either the Wilson (black line), NRTL (red Une), or mM (green line) models were employed for obtaining the activity coefficient derivatives. Note that the NRTL and mM model approaches infinity since they predict a phase split. (Calculated values from R. J. Wooley and J. P. O Connell, 1991, A Database of Flnctuation Thermodynamic Properties and Molecular Correlation-Function Integrals for a Variety of Binary Liquids, Fluid Phase Equilibria, 66, 233.) (See color insert.)... [Pg.160]

The characteiization of non-ideal solutions is often made by means of excess functions because, unlike the activity coefficients, they are easily and directly obtained from experimental data. [Pg.49]

In an elegant paper, by Moleslq and Moran, a fourth-order perturbative model is suggested and developed for the study of photoinduced IC. The authors stress that in case of a similar timescale for the electronic and nuclear motions, a second-order perturbation scheme, a la Fermi, will fail. Additionally, the model, as suggested here, in the case of a dominant promoting mode, can exclusively be parameterised from experimental data. The method is based on a three-way partition of a model Hamiltonian—system, bath and system-bath interaction. Subsequent use of a time correlation function approach facilitates the evaluation of rate formulas. This analysis is applied to a three-level model system containing a ground state, an optical active excited state and an optical dark state, the latter two share a CDC. In their paper the model is used to analyse the initial photoinduced process of alpha-terpinene. The primary conclusion of the study is that the most important influence on the population decay (Gaussian versus exponential) is the rate at which the wavepacket approaches the CIX of the two exeited states. [Pg.16]

Activity coefficients are usually calculated from experimental data. Figure 2.15 sketches typical activity coefficient data as a function of the light component composition X. Empirical equations (Van Laar, Margules, Wilson, etc.) are used to correlate activity coeffidoit data. [Pg.45]

To make obtained experimental data more clear theoretical study was performed. Density functional theoiy calculations with PBE functional and gold pseudopotential with relativistic corrections included show that an isolated Aug and Auio clusters should be able to catalyze the CO oxidation reaction even below room temperature. The disklike geometry is chosen on the base of STM data. Two possible reaction paths are considered O2 dissociates on clusters or adsorbed O2 reacts directly with adsorbed CO. Both reactions are found to be extremely facile on Auio cluster, with reaction barriers equals to 65,6 kJ/mol indicating that the reactions should be possible well below room temperature. Calculated value of activation energy is close to result obtained from experimental data (65,6 kJ/mol). [Pg.300]

Fit parameters in binary activity coefficient models on your own and with ThermoSolver from experimental data with objective functions or by linear regression, when appropriate. [Pg.467]

Figure A2.4.6. Mean activity coefFicient for NaCl solution at 25 °C as a function of the concentration full curve from ((A2A61 ) dashed curve from ((A2A63 ) dot-dashed curve from (A2.4.64). The crosses denote experimental data. From [2],... Figure A2.4.6. Mean activity coefFicient for NaCl solution at 25 °C as a function of the concentration full curve from ((A2A61 ) dashed curve from ((A2A63 ) dot-dashed curve from (A2.4.64). The crosses denote experimental data. From [2],...

See other pages where Activity function from experimental data is mentioned: [Pg.63]    [Pg.92]    [Pg.148]    [Pg.117]    [Pg.515]    [Pg.1650]    [Pg.424]    [Pg.6263]    [Pg.383]    [Pg.372]    [Pg.6262]    [Pg.49]    [Pg.213]    [Pg.91]    [Pg.263]    [Pg.304]    [Pg.35]    [Pg.46]    [Pg.41]    [Pg.187]    [Pg.192]    [Pg.413]    [Pg.215]    [Pg.56]    [Pg.40]    [Pg.35]    [Pg.177]    [Pg.257]    [Pg.260]    [Pg.262]    [Pg.184]    [Pg.29]    [Pg.259]    [Pg.106]    [Pg.46]   


SEARCH



Activating function

Activation function

Active functional

Activity Data

Activity from experimental data

Functional activation

Functional activity

Functions activity

© 2024 chempedia.info