Active ingredients, application

Brand Name" Active Ingredient Application Sales (2005) million metric tons ... 

Trade name Active ingredients Application type... 

Finished product The applicant should show that the manufacturing process produces no unacceptable changes in the stereochemical purity of the active ingredient and that such changes do not occur on storage for the proposed shelf-life. 

Boiler water foaming and frothing is undesirable because it contributes to overheating, carryover, and loss of operational control. As a result, antifoam and defoamer products are commonly employed in BW treatment programs. The same active ingredients are also widely used in all types of industrial processes (industrial grades), as well as in cosmetic, food, potable water, and kosher applications (all agents typically are odorless, colorless, and tasteless). 

Hoechst. 1985c. Endosulfan - active ingredient technical (code HOE 02671 OIZD97 0003) Testing for subchronic dermal toxicity - 21 applications over 30 days - in Wistar rats. Hoechst Aktiengesellschaft, Frankfurt, Germany. Report no. 84.0223. [unpublished study]... 

If we assume that the TCDD is contained in the surface 6 inches of the soil profile since it is relatively immobile (5), then the 2,4,5-T at the 947 lbs of active ingredient/acre treatment would have had to contain 2.1 ppm TCDD to be observed. At the lower application rates of 584 and 160 lbs/acre, the 2,4,5-T would have had to contain 3.5 and 12.5 ppm TCDD in the technical materials to have 1 ppb in the top 6 inches of soil. Since the soil is sandy and high rainfall occurred in the area, maximum movement of materials in soil may occur causing TCDD to be present deeper in the profile. If the TCDD moved uniformly throughout the 36 inch soil profile, then six times more TCDD would have had to be present in the original 2,4,5-T for detection. This would have required the presence of 12.6, 21.0, and 75.0 ppm TCDD in the 2,4,5-T applied in the three treatments. These calculations are based on the assumption that no degradation occurred in or on the soil. 

Defoamer formulations currently contain numerous ingredients to meet the diverse requirements for which they are formulated. Various classification approaches are possible, including classification by application, physical form of the defoamer, and the chemical type of the defoamer. In general, defoamers contain a variety of active ingredients, both in solid and in liquid states, and a number of ancillary agents such as emulsifiers, spreading agents, thickeners, preservatives, carrier oils, compatibilizers, solvents, and water. 

These annexes set out the requirements for the dossier to be submitted by applicants either for inclusion of an a.i. in Annex I or for authorization of a plant protection product. Active ingredients are listed in Annex I if their use and their residues, resulting from applications consistent with good plant protection practice [or Good Agricultural Practice (GAP)] do not have harmful effects on human and animal health, or on ground water or any unacceptable influence on the environment (Article 5 of the Directive). 

However, there is no general requirement that enforcement methods need to monitor all metabolites of an active ingredient. The primary purpose of enforcement methods is to detect violations of good agricultural practice. For this purpose, residue levels found in samples from the market (so-called Market Basket Surveys) have to be compared with MRLs, which are derived from residue concentrations found in supervised trials. It is not necessary for this comparison to be based on the total pesticide residue. Most often the choice of a single compound (e.g., parent or primary metabolite) as a marker of the total pesticide residue is more feasible. Method development and the later method application are much easier in that case. Only for intake calculation purposes, e.g., when the daily intake of pesticide residues (calculated from the results... 

Where a significant part of the consumable crop is present during the application, half of the trials reported should include data on the residue level present over time (residue decline studies). The number of decline trials may be reduced if it can be shown that the edible part of the crop is not affected or present at the time of application of the test item and no movement of the active ingredient or its metabolite occurs. 

The mathematics involved with calculating the amount of active ingredient, formulated product, adjuvants, and water to put in a spray tank to achieve the application rate specified in the protocol should be addressed prior to arrival at the field for the first application. This is also true for the calibration method. The author has found that if eight agronomists are involved in a spray application, one will encounter eight distinct calibration methods. If a calibration SOP is not written for the spray equipment to be used, the precise steps in the calibration process should be documented in the field notebook. 

Pesticide residues consist of chemicals that might occur in a commodity as a result of application of a pesticide. Such chemicals typically correspond to compounds for which a regulatory agency has or will set a tolerance, i.e., a maximum residue limit, specific to the commodity. In either a field study or a market basket survey, residues to be determined will be those which result from application of the specific pesticide that the study is intended to support. A market basket survey, however, might be intended to support not just one but several different pesticides of the same or different chemical classes. In addition, a market basket survey might include pesticides not used in the USA but for which import tolerances exist. For example, some uses of the parathion family of pesticides on food products have been abandoned in the USA but remain in other countries that export the products to the USA. A market basket survey offers a means to evaluate actual dietary exposures to residues of such pesticides. In addition, tolerance expressions frequently include multiple compounds, all of which must typically be determined in residue field trials. The sponsor of the market basket survey must decide whether to analyze for all compounds in the applicable tolerance expression or to restrict the program to selected analytes, such as the active ingredient. 

Applicators, mixers, loaders, and others who mix, spray, or apply pesticides to crops face potential dermal and/or inhalation exposure when handling bulk quantities of the formulated active ingredients. Although the exposure periods are short and occur only a few times annually, an estimate of this exposure can be obtained by quantifying the excreted polar urinary metabolites. Atrazine is the most studied triazine for potential human exposure purposes, and, therefore, most of the reported methods address the determination of atrazine or atrazine and its metabolites in urine. To a lesser extent, methods are also reported for the analysis of atrazine in blood plasma and serum. 

Another approach to improving agrochemical detection is to apply more of the active ingredient to increase the initial soil concentration. As mentioned previously, however, one must be careful not to exceed greatly the labeled application rate of the compound as questions may arise as to concentration effects on the observed dissipation. A more common and acceptable approach is to section the upper soil core into smaller depth increments, yielding increased residue concentrations as the total amount of soil mixed with the residues decreases in each processed sample (Table 1). 

Diazinon SOW was applied by air blast sprayers in accordance with typical application practices for orchards. Application began in March and continued until early-to mid-July. Dormant sprays typically contained diazinon in an oil mixture. Aqueous emulsions were applied as foliar sprays thereafter. Eqmpment was calibrated to provide an application rate of 3.4 kg active ingredient (a.i.)ha At least five applications were made at approximately 2-week intervals. During these applications, 233 samples were taken from spray tanks across the four treatment fields to estimate the application rate in PA, and 244 samples were collected in WA. 

DFR studies are designed and conducted to describe the decline profile of the active ingredient on foliage and/or soil surfaces when applications are made at the proposed label rate. These surfaces are limited to those which can be touched or disturbed by workers and from which residues can be dislodged, deposited on human skin and clothing, or inhaled during the performance of field work and harvesting operations. 

The actual application rate should be calculated based on output, the active ingredient concentration, and the application time or land area covered. Once the plot has been treated, the amount of product or spray volume remaining should be checked as verification of the application rate. 

Tracer materials are defined as any product included in the test substance that can be recovered analytically for determining the drift from the application. This may be the active ingredient in an actual tank mix, or it may be a material added to the tank mix for subsequent detection. The selection of an appropriate tracer for assessing deposition rates in the field is critical to the success of a field study. Tracer materials such as low-level active ingredient products, colored dyes, fluorescent dyes, metallic salts, rare earth elements and radioactive isotopes have been used with varying degrees of success in the field. An appropriate tracer should have the following characteristics ... 

---