Active centre ionic

Chain reactions do not continue indefinitely, but in the nature of the reactivity of the free radical or ionic centre they are likely to react readily in ways that will destroy the reactivity. For example, in radical polymerisations two growing molecules may combine to extinguish both radical centres with formation of a chemical bond. Alternatively they may react in a disproportionation reaction to generate end groups in two molecules, one of which is unsaturated. Lastly, active centres may find other molecules to react with, such as solvent or impurity, and in this way the active centre is destroyed and the polymer molecule ceases to grow. 

Table 2 shows the evolution of the ionic random walk with unequal transition probabilities, movement to active centre si being twice more probable than to active centre s5. 

In principle, all of the elements of the periodic table can be used to iucorporate foreign ions in crystals. Actually, only a number of elements have been used for optically active centres in crystals in other words, only a number of elements can be incorporated in ionic form and give rise to energy levels within the gap separated by optical energies. The most relevant centers for technological applications (although not the unique ones) are based on ions formed from the transition metal and rare earth series of the periodic table, so we will focus our attention on these centers. 

Alumina is a catalyst which shows intermediate behaviour and over which the concerted E2 mechanism is accepted [66] with slight transition either to the E2cA or E2cB mechanisms according to the structure of the reactant. Salts of strong acids and bases also show similar intermediate properties. The concerted or partly concerted mechanisms require two-site adsorption and because the mechanisms are ionic, the active centre must consist of a pair of an acidic and a basic site. Metal salts fulfil this... 

An important criterion for classification is the type of active centre and depending on its type we classify polymerizations as radical, ionic (which are further classified as anionic or cationic) and coordination. 

Each vinyl particle acts as a counter-ion of the vinyl particle of opposite charge. These salts may be regarded as ionic active centres with a polymerizable counter-ion. 

The interpretation of the mechanism of anionic lactam polymerization based on the conventional scheme (ionic active centre with approaching monomer) could not exhaustively explain all the observed effects. Agreement could only be obtained when the acido-basic properties of lactams and polyamides had been respected. The equilibrium... 

Strictly speaking, some kind of coordination is a prerequisite for any ionic polymerization. Some active centres can bind the monomer prior to its controlled attachment to the end of a propagating macromolecule. Chains of a regular or tactic polymer are thus formed. Such processes are designated as coordination polymerizations proper. At the present time, the centres of alkene coordination polymerizations and the precursors of such centres are of greatest importance. 

In the previous sections, methods of qualitatively controlling the course of propagation were described. Indirect control as well as the quantitative effects caused by intentional control of the other partial processes in polymerization have still to be mentioned. The separation of initiation from propagation alters the kinetic character of the whole reaction. With ionic polymerizations, initiation can be separated from propagation by the selection of conditions suitable for rapid initiation. With radical polymerizations, this is not possible. Therefore both partial processes must be separated in space. Fortunately, radical active centres operate both in polar and in non polar media. Thus it is not difficult to confine initiation and propagation to mutually immiscible components of the medium. Emulsion polymerization remains the most important representative of quantitative control of propagation. 

The radical model cannot be applied for ionic and coordination polymerizations. With a few exceptions, termination by mutual combination of active centres does not occur. The only possibility is to measure the rate of each copolymerization independently. The situation can be greatly simplified for copolymerizations in living systems. The constants ku and k22 can usually be measured easily in homopolymerizations. Also, the coaddition constants fc12 or k2] are often directly accessible when the M] and M2 active centres can be differentiated spectroscopically or when the rate of monomer M2 (M[) consumption at M] M 2 centres can be measured. Ionic equibria, association, polarity of medium and solvation must be respected, even when their quantitative effect is not known exactly. The unusual situations confronting macromolecular chemistry will be demonstrated by the example of the anionic copolymerization of styrene with butadiene initiated by lithium alkyls in hydrocarbon medium. 

In the simplest case, with rapid initiation and participation of a single type of active centre, the rate of propagation is equal to the polymerization rate, and kp is the overall polymerization rate constant. Rapid initiation can be established in ionic processes the presence of several kinds of centres means unequal numbers of monomer molecule additions to different centres. Long macromolecules will be formed on "rapid centres, shorter ones on "slow centres. A practical example of this situation is anionic living polymerization with the participation of contact and solvent-separated ion pairs, and of free ions. 

Cationic polymerizations are less well understood than their anionic counterparts, particularly concerning the participation of various ionic forms of active centres in propagation. The values k+, k +, and fc(+ )s have mostly not been safely determined (with the exception of some heterocycles, see below). The main reason is probably contamination of centres by solvating molecules, and the instability of various centre types caused by the simultaneous solvating and polymerizing ability of the monomers. 

Equilibria between various forms of living centres were treated in Chap. 5, Sect. 8.1. Equilibria of similar character control the arrangement and reactivity of all ionic centres. When polymerization-inactive structures participate in the equilibria, the number of active centres is reduced by the equilibrium amount of inactive forms. This phenomenon is usually not considered as termination the unreactive particles are treated as dormant. In the course of polymerization, however, the physico-chemical parameters of the system change as a function of the monomer-polymer transformation. Changes in permittivity, viscosity and the amount of polymer can cause shifts in ionization and dissociation equilibria. The kinetic manifestations of such changes are identical with the occurrence of termination. 

Ionic equilibria can be shifted by the addition of salts containing a common ion with the active centre. These shifts have been treated in Chap. 5, Sect. 8.1 they cannot, of course, be designated as termination even though they are accompanied by a considerable lowering of the polymerization rate. 

The situation has already been described in the preceding paragraph where one of the combining ions comes from the added electrolyte. When both combining ions are natural components of the polymerizing system we have a case of pure termination. Combination of the counter-ion with the active centre is the reason why many sufficiently strong acids and bases cannot be used for the initiation of ionic polymerizations. 

Coordination of molecules to some part of an ionic active centre may increase its activity or it may lead to its complete deactivation. The detailed structure and properties of these C+ and C complexes are not suf-... 

Decay of ionic and coordination centres always leads to the formation of some end groups and centre residues. The centres usually lose their polymerizing activity on contact with atmospheric humidity. A residue of very active centres, which are rare, is usually not removed from the polymer (e.g. of the order of one ppm of the transition metal in low-pressure polyethylene). Larger residues have to be washed out (some types of polypropylene are still washed at the present time). 

The difficulties involved in the direct determination of the momentary concentration of active centres are the most serious shortcoming in studies of termination itself. With radical polymerizations we at least know the most probable method of centre decay, and thus the molecular scheme of the termination reaction. In ionic and coordination polymerizations, the termination mechanism is mostly unknown. Quite generally we can write... 

Active centres of ionic polymerizations do not usually decay by mutual collisions as the radical centres. The stationary state, when it exists at all, results from quite different causes, mostly specific to the given system. Therefore the kinetics of ionic polymerizations is more complicated and its analysis more difficult. The concentration of centres cannot usually be calculated. On the other hand, ionic systems with rapid initiation give rise to the kinetically very simple living polymerizations (see Chap. 5, Sect. 8.1). 

About thirty years ago, all cases of polymerization kinetics used to be solved as statinary reactions. Hayes and Pepper [27] were the first to call attention to the non-stationary character of ionic polymerizations. They noticed the premature decay of styrene polymerization initiated by H2S04 (see Fig. 8). This was a simple case of non-stationarity caused by the slow decay of rapidly generated active centres [27, 28]. They assumed that the polymerization proceeds according to a rather conventional scheme represented in simplified form (without transfer) by the reactions... 

The n-propyl derivative was used as a chiral reaction medium (ionic liquid) to react a-naphthol with ethyl pyruvate in the presence of the Lewis acid CpZrClj resulting in a racemic mixture of products (see Figure 6.21). Apparently the chiral centre in the histidine backbone of the ionic liquid has no bearing on the steric situation around the active centre of the catalytic reaction. 

When ionic polymerizations are categorized it is usually according to the polarity of the active centre - anionic or cationic. There is, however, a more fundamental classification, based on the counter ion is it or is it not covalently bound to the growing polymer chain ... 

In the polymerization of ethylene by (Tr-CjHsljTiClj/AlMejCl [111] and of butadiene by Co(acac)3/AlEt2Cl/H2 0 [87] there is evidence for bimolecular termination. The conclusions on ethylene polymerization have been questioned, however, and it has been proposed that intramolecular decomposition of the catalyst complex occurs via ionic intermediates [91], Smith and Zelmer [275] have examined several catalyst systems for ethylene polymerization and with the assumption that the rate at any time is proportional to the active site concentration ([C ]), second order catalyst decay was deduced, since 1 — [Cf] /[Cf] was linear with time. This evidence, of course, does not distinguish between chemical deactivation and physical occlusion of sites. In conjugated diene polymerization by Group VIII metal catalysts -the unsaturated polymer chain stabilizes the active centre and the copolymerization of a monoolefin which converts the growing chain from a tt to a a bonded structure is followed by a catalyst decomposition, with a reduction in rate and polymer molecular weight [88]. 

More complex situations have been treated analytically, such as reversible deactivation of initially active catalyst either by dimerization (2C C2) or bimolecular reaction (C + C 2C) [99]. Approach to equilibrium concentration of active centres would be accompanied by a fall in rate to a steady value (assuming constant monomer concentration and a stable catalyst) and a rise in molecular weight with time either to a maximum value or to a steady rate of increase dependent on the presence or absence of transfer reactions. The effect on average molecular weight of transfer reactions in which the catalyst entities possess two active centres has been calculated [100]. Although some ionic catalysts may behave in this way there is no evidence to indicate that these mechanisms apply to any known coordination catalyst. 

---