Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Catalysts decay

The differential reactor is simple to construct and inexpensive. However, during operation, care must be taken to ensure that the reactant gas or liquid does not bypass or channel through the packed catalyst, but instead flows uniformly across the catalyst. This reactor is a poor choice if the catalyst decays rapidly, since the rate of reaction parameters at the start of a run will be different from those at the end of the run. [Pg.245]

If the catalyst decays during the experiment, the reaction rates will be significantly different at the end of the experiment than at the... [Pg.245]

Summary of reactor ratings, gas-liquid, powdered catalyst, decaying catalyst system... [Pg.253]

Various investigators have tried to obtain information concerning the reaction mechanism from kinetic studies. However, as is often the case in catalytic studies, the reproducibility of the kinetic measurements proved to be poor. A poor reproducibility can be caused by many factors, including sensitivity of the catalyst to traces of poisons in the reactants and dependence of the catalytic activity on storage conditions, activation procedures, and previous experimental use. Moreover, the activity of the catalyst may not be constant in time because of an induction period or of catalyst decay. Hence, it is often impossible to obtain a catalyst with a constant, reproducible activity and, therefore, kinetic data must be evaluated carefully. [Pg.160]

The effects of diffusion and catalyst decay cause yields from a continuous backmix reactor to be 25 to 30% lower than from a semibatch reactor at the same residence time. This yield penalty can be reduced by staging backmix reactors in series. [Pg.218]

For all samples, a strong dependence of the temperature of pretreatment on the initial activity and on the catalyst decay was observed. For example, the initial conversion of CS1.9P pretreated at 473 K, was reduced by about one half after a pretreatment at 573K and the deactivation was more pronounced. [Pg.596]

FI. Observe the influence of the catalyst decay constant, Kq on the outlet product concentration, which should slowly decrease. Make runs for a range of Kd values. [Pg.322]

Catalyst Decay. Asymmetric hydrogenation of the SM using the Et-DuPhos-Rh catalyst exhibits a catalyst threshold behavior. When the initial charge of the catalyst is below this threshold value, the reaction is not completed. This indicates that the catalyst may become deactivated. [Pg.36]

As mentioned above one of the fundamental attributes ascribed to homogeneous catalysts is superior activity at low temperature. However, even within classes of such catalysts, improvements in catalyst activity can be made allowing operation at lower temperatures, thus reducing or avoiding completely this mode of catalyst decay. One such example can found in recent advances in palladium catalysed ethene carbonylation (Equation 1.1). [Pg.5]

The sterically encumbered R2 substituents give steric protection to the oxygen-donors that are attached to the metal centers from coordination with Lewis acids such as MAO, or from another molecule of the catalytically active cationic species, which are supposed to be highly electrophilic. The coordination increases steric congestion near the polymerization center, which at least hampers ethylene coordination to the metal. Even worse, it may cause catalyst decay by, for instance, loss of the ligand. [Pg.14]

Moreover, the catalyst deactivation must also be considered in order to use these solid materials in industrial processes. Figure 13.8 shows the variation of catal54ic activity (2-butene conversion) with the time on stream obtained under the same reaction conditions on different solid-acid catalysts. It can be seen how all the solid-acids catalysts studied generally suffer a relatively rapid catalyst deactivation, although both beta zeolite and nafion-sihca presented the lower catalyst decays. Since the regeneration of beta zeolite is more easy than of nafion, beta zeolite was considered to be an interesting alternative. ... [Pg.259]

Figure 13.8 Catalyst decay during the isobutane alkylation on nafion/Si02, sulfated zirconia, beta-zeolite, and MCM-41-supported 12-tungstophosphoric acid. Figure 13.8 Catalyst decay during the isobutane alkylation on nafion/Si02, sulfated zirconia, beta-zeolite, and MCM-41-supported 12-tungstophosphoric acid.
Aramendia et al. (22) investigated three separate organic test reactions such as, 1-phenyl ethanol, 2-propanol, and 2-methyl-3-butyn-2-ol (MBOH) on acid-base oxide catalysts. They reached the same conclusions about the acid-base characteristics of the samples with each of the three reactions. However, they concluded that notwithstanding the greater complexity in the reactivity of MBOH, the fact that the different products could be unequivocally related to a given type of active site makes MBOH a preferred test reactant. Unfortunately, an important drawback of the decomposition of this alcohol is that these reactions suffer from a strong deactivation caused by the formation of heavy products by aldolization of the ketone (22) and polymerization of acetylene (95). The occurrence of this reaction can certainly complicate the comparison of basic catalysts that have different intrinsic rates of the test reaction and the reaction causing catalyst decay. [Pg.251]

We will use the term deactivation for all types of catalyst decay, both fast and slow and we will call any material which deposits on the surface to lower its activity a poison. [Pg.473]

A fourth process for catalyst decay involves the structural modification or sintering of the catalyst surface caused by exposure of the catalyst to extreme conditions. This type of decay is dependent on the time that the catalyst spends in the high temperature environment, and since it is unaffected by the materials in the gas stream we call it independent deactivation. [Pg.474]

Pore Diffusion. For a pellet, pore diffusion may strongly influence the progress of catalyst decay. First consider parallel deactivation. From Chapter 18 we know that reactant may either be evenly distributed throughout the pellet Mj < 0.4... [Pg.474]

This observation was not so obvious on coke yields because the coke production is a contribution of mnltiple mechanisms and reactions. Thus, the coke yields are quite similar, probably because the catalytic coke is decreased while the contaminant coke is increased. The coke remarks are also observed on the CPS samples taking into account that the dehydrogenation degree is not strongly affected by the extended ReDox cycles, becanse the lower catalysts decay is limiting the effect of the required mass of catalyst (C/0 ratio). Thus, the small decrement of the coke yield on the CPS samples is possibly related to the descent of the catalyst (less specific area) leaving less available space for coke adsorption and less activity for catalytic coke production. It is clear that prolonging the deactivation procednres is not beneficial as far as the metal effects are concerned. [Pg.138]

If the uncatalysed reaction rate increases with respect to the rate of catalyst decay, so that ku becomes larger than gk2, there are no real solutions to eqn (3.60). The stationary state can no longer become unstable as /i is varied. Damped oscillatory responses can still be observed when we have a stable focus, but undamped oscillations will not be found. [Pg.74]

Stationary-state behaviour for systems with catalyst decay... [Pg.161]

In between these tangencies, the curves R and L have three intersections, so the system has multiple stationary states (Fig. 7.3(b)). We see the characteristic S-shaped curve, with a hysteresis loop, similar to that observed with cubic autocatalysis in the absence of catalyst decay ( 4.2). [Pg.189]

The previous two chapters have considered the stationary-state behaviour of reactions in continuous-flow well-stirred reactions. It was seen in chapters 2-5 that stationary states are not always stable. We now address the question of the local stability in a CSTR. For this we return to the isothermal model with cubic autocatalysis. Again we can take the model in two stages (i) systems with no catalyst decay, k2 = 0 and (ii) systems in which the catalyst is not indefinitely stable, so the concentrations of A and B are decoupled. In the former case, it was found from a qualitative analysis of the flow diagram in 6.2.5 that unique states are stable and that when there are multiple solutions they alternate between stable and unstable. In this chapter we become more quantitative and reveal conditions where the simplest exponential decay of perturbations is replaced by more complex time dependences. [Pg.211]

When the catalyst decays we have a two-variable system and hence there is the potential for Hopf bifurcations and sustained oscillations. In our flow reactor, we have the possibility of oscillation about one stationary state... [Pg.211]

We should first recall the stationary-state behaviour for this case. If the reaction rate constant for the catalyst decay step is large compared with that for the autocatalytic step, so that k2 > iV, the system can only ever have one stationary state. This state corresponds to no net conversion of A to B, so ass = 1. For slower decay rates, k2 < Vs non-zero stationary states exist over a range of residence times t 9 < ires < t+s in the form of an isola. The extents of conversion along the branches of the isola are given by... [Pg.220]

The zero conversion state, ax = 1, Px =0, exists for all residence times Tres and catalyst decay rates k2. The elements of the Jacobian matrix are especially simple for this solution ... [Pg.222]

Both are always real and both are always negative. This stationary state is thus always stable to small perturbations which decay monotonically to zero in an exponential manner. The relaxation times (there are now two and the decay occurs as the sum of two exponentials) are related to the residence time and to the inverse of the rate constant for catalyst decay. For instance, the decay of the perturbation in A can be written in the form... [Pg.222]


See other pages where Catalysts decay is mentioned: [Pg.507]    [Pg.244]    [Pg.245]    [Pg.248]    [Pg.249]    [Pg.230]    [Pg.209]    [Pg.541]    [Pg.598]    [Pg.36]    [Pg.428]    [Pg.321]    [Pg.269]    [Pg.278]    [Pg.256]    [Pg.473]    [Pg.473]    [Pg.309]    [Pg.140]    [Pg.171]    [Pg.177]    [Pg.177]    [Pg.179]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.35 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.309 , Pg.310 , Pg.311 , Pg.312 , Pg.313 , Pg.314 , Pg.315 , Pg.316 , Pg.317 , Pg.318 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.660 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.16 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.176 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.16 ]




SEARCH



Activity, catalyst decay

Algorithms catalyst decay

Catalyst activity decay functions

Catalyst decay law

Catalyst quantifying decay

Catalyst, decaying

Catalyst, decaying

Catalyst, decaying diffusion

Combination step catalyst decay

Decay of catalysts

Rate laws catalyst decay

Reaction-diffusion systems with decaying catalyst

Reactor volume catalyst decay

Reversibility with catalyst decay

Stationary-state behaviour for systems with catalyst decay

Temperature Forcing of Reactors with Catalyst Decay

© 2024 chempedia.info