Activation energy interpretation

Holroyd (1977) finds that generally the attachment reactions are very fast (fej - 1012-1013 M 1s 1), are relatively insensitive to temperature, and increase with electron mobility. The detachment reactions are sensitive to temperature and the nature of the liquid. Fitted to the Arrhenius equation, these reactions show very large preexponential factors, which allow the endothermic detachment reactions to occur despite high activation energy. Interpreted in terms of the transition state theory and taking the collision frequency as 1013 s 1- these preexponential factors give activation entropies 100 to 200 J/(mole.K), depending on the solute and the solvent. 

A similar model was analyzed by Pikios and Luss (283). They analyzed the same set of reaction steps with the coverage-dependent activation energy interpreted in terms of surface heterogeneity. They derived criteria for the occurrence of oscillations as did Belyaev et al. (154,162). They also found a singular steady state, which became a limit cycle for values of the surface heterogeneity lying above a certain threshold value, and they performed numerical analyses of these oscillatory states. 

Calculations at several levels of theory (AMI, 6-31G, and MP2/6-31G ) find lower activation energies for the transition state leading to the observed product. The transition-state calculations presumably reflect the same structural features as the frontier orbital approach. The greatest transition-state stabilization should arise from the most favorable orbital interactions. As discussed earlier for Diels-Alder reactions, the-HSAB theory can also be applied to interpretation of the regiochemistry of 1,3-dipolar cycloaddi-... 

The reverse reaction, closure of butadiene to cyclobutene, has also been explored computationally, using CAS-SCF calculations. The distrotatory pathway is found to be favored, although the interpretation is somewhat more complex than the simplest Woodward-Hoffinann formulation. It is found that as disrotatory motion occurs, the singly excited state crosses the doubly excited state, which eventually leads to the ground state via a conical intersection. A conrotatory pathway also exists, but it requires an activation energy. 

Simple collision theory does not provide a detailed interpretation of the energy barrier or a method for the calculation of activation energy. It also fails to lead to interpretations in terms of molecular structure. The notable feature of collision theoiy is that, with very simple means, it provides one basis for defining typical or normal kinetic behavior, thereby directing attention to unusual behavior. 

Following the general trend of looldng for a molecular description of the properties of matter, self-diffusion in liquids has become a key quantity for interpretation and modeling of transport in liquids [5]. Self-diffusion coefficients can be combined with other data, such as viscosities, electrical conductivities, densities, etc., in order to evaluate and improve solvodynamic models such as the Stokes-Einstein type [6-9]. From temperature-dependent measurements, activation energies can be calculated by the Arrhenius or the Vogel-Tamman-Fulcher equation (VTF), in order to evaluate models that treat the diffusion process similarly to diffusion in the solid state with jump or hole models [1, 2, 7]. 

However, measurements of substituent effects supported the hypothesis that the aryl cation is a key intermediate in dediazoniations, provided that they were interpreted in an appropriate way (Zollinger, 1973a Ehrenson et al., 1973 Swain et al., 1975 a). We will first consider the activation energy and then discuss the influence of substituents, as well as additional data concerning the aryl cation as a metastable intermediate (kinetic isotope effects, influence of water acitivity in hydroxy-de-di-azoniations). Finally, the cases of dediazoniation in which the rate of reaction is first-order with regard to the concentration of the nucleophile will be critically evaluated. 

It is apparent, from the above short survey, that kinetic studies have been restricted to the decomposition of a relatively few coordination compounds and some are largely qualitative or semi-quantitative in character. Estimations of thermal stabilities, or sometimes the relative stabilities within sequences of related salts, are often made for consideration within a wider context of the structures and/or properties of coordination compounds. However, it cannot be expected that the uncritical acceptance of such parameters as the decomposition temperature, the activation energy, and/or the reaction enthalpy will necessarily give information of fundamental significance. There is always uncertainty in the reliability of kinetic information obtained from non-isothermal measurements. Concepts derived from studies of homogeneous reactions of coordination compounds have often been transferred, sometimes without examination of possible implications, to the interpretation of heterogeneous behaviour. Important characteristic features of heterogeneous rate processes, such as the influence of defects and other types of imperfection, have not been accorded sufficient attention. 

The Arrhenius activation energy,3 obtained from the temperature dependence of the three-halves-order rate constant, is Ea = 201 kJ mol-1. This is considerably less than the standard enthalpy change for the homolysis of acetaldehyde, determined by the usual thermodynamic methods. That is, reaction (8-5) has AH = 345 kJ mol-1. At first glance, this disparity makes it seem as if dissociation of acetaldehyde could not be a predecessor step. Actually, however, the agreement is excellent when properly interpreted. 

The expression for Eq. (8-14) can be interpreted in terms of the activation energy for a composite rate constant as explained in Chapter 7. In those terms Ea is... 

Both the reactors are operated in batch, and the concentrations of components involved are measured online by electro-conductivity. Data interpretation is made by the kinetic equation of second order. The results obtained in the range of 25-45"C are given in Table 3. Again, the values for the rate constant measured in SCISR, ks, are S5 tematically higher than those in STR, ksr, by about 20%, and no significant difference betvi een the values for the active energy measured in SCISR and STR has been found. 

In principle this is derived from an Arrhenius plot of In r+ versus 1/T but such a plot may deviate from a straight line. Hence, the apparent activation energy may only be valid for a limited temperature range. As for the orders of reaction, one should be very careful when interpreting the activation energy since it depends on the experimental conditions. Below is an example where the forward rate depends both on an activated process and equilibrium steps, representing a situation that occurs frequently in catalytic reactions. 

The reaction was followed by means of the strong absorption of the Os(II) complex at 480 m/i. Unlike the Tl(riI) + Fe(II) system, there is a slight increase in rate as the hydrogen-ion concentration is increased. The kinetic data were interpreted on the basis that both Tl and TIOH react with Os(bipy)3 (with rate coefficients and respectively). At 24.5 °C and ju = 2.99 M, kj = 36.0 l.mole. see and= 14.7 l.mole sec corresponding activation energies are 6.90 and 11.5 kcal.mole" The latter values are considerably smaller than those for the T1(III) + T1(I) exchange and for the Tl(III)- -Fe(II) reaction . On the other hand, all three reactions are subject to retardation by Cl ions. 

A few data exist on the oxidation of water by Ag(ril) ethylenedibiguanide nitrate . The decomposition is only approximately first-order in oxidant in both water and dilute nitric acid. The activation energies are very different for the two media, (H2O, 27.8 kcal.mole HNO3, 18.65 kcal.mole ). A is about 10 for water and 10 for nitric acid solutions. These data are inadequate for mechanistic interpretation. 

Results for styrene - yield Ea 21 kcal. Since Ep — Et/2 was found previously to be 6.5 kcal., we conclude that the activation energy Ei for thermal initiation in styrene is 29 kcal., which would be quite acceptable for the process (21), already rejected on other grounds. For methyl methacrylate, Ea—l kcal. and Ep — Et/2 = b kcal. Hence Ei = 22 kcal. These initiation reactions are very much slower than is normal for other reactions with similar activation energies. The extraordinarily low frequency factors Ai apparently are responsible. For methyl methacrylate, Ai is less than unity. Interpreted as a bimo-lecular process, this would imply initiation at only one collision in about 10 of those occurring with the requisite energy ... 

---