Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Absorption spectroscopy, compared

The pyrolysis of CR NH (<1 mbar) was perfomied at 1.3 atm in Ar, spectroscopically monitoring the concentration of NH2 radicals behind the reflected shock wave as a fiinction of time. The interesting aspect of this experiment was the combination of a shock-tube experiment with the particularly sensitive detection of the NH2 radicals by frequency-modulated, laser-absorption spectroscopy [ ]. Compared with conventional narrow-bandwidth laser-absorption detection the signal-to-noise ratio could be increased by a factor of 20, with correspondingly more accurate values for the rate constant k T). [Pg.2125]

Pump-probe absorption experiments on the femtosecond time scale generally fall into two effective types, depending on the duration and spectral width of the pump pulse. If tlie pump spectrum is significantly narrower in width than the electronic absorption line shape, transient hole-burning spectroscopy [101. 102. 103. 104. 105. 106. 107. 108. 109. 110. 111. 112 and 113] can be perfomied. The second type of experiment, dynamic absorption spectroscopy [57, 114. 115. 116. 117. 118. 119. 120. 121 and 122], can be perfomied if the pump and probe pulses are short compared to tlie period of the vibrational modes that are coupled to the electronic transition. [Pg.1979]

Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy. Mercury, separated from a measured sample, may be passed as vapor iato a closed system between an ultraviolet lamp and a photocell detector or iato the light path of an atomic absorption spectrometer. Ground-state atoms ia the vapor attenuate the light decreasiag the current output of the photocell ia an amount proportional to the concentration of the mercury. The light absorption can be measured at 253.7 nm and compared to estabUshed caUbrated standards (21). A mercury concentration of 0.1 ppb can be measured by atomic absorption. [Pg.108]

Atomic absorption spectroscopy of VPD solutions (VPD-AAS) and instrumental neutron activation analysis (INAA) offer similar detection limits for metallic impurities with silicon substrates. The main advantage of TXRF, compared to VPD-AAS, is its multielement capability AAS is a sequential technique that requires a specific lamp to detect each element. Furthermore, the problem of blank values is of little importance with TXRF because no handling of the analytical solution is involved. On the other hand, adequately sensitive detection of sodium is possible only by using VPD-AAS. INAA is basically a bulk analysis technique, while TXRF is sensitive only to the surface. In addition, TXRF is fast, with an typical analysis time of 1000 s turn-around times for INAA are on the order of weeks. Gallium arsenide surfaces can be analyzed neither by AAS nor by INAA. [Pg.355]

Table 5.12 shows the main features of luminescence spectroscopy. The much higher sensitivity and specificity of luminescence techniques compared to absorption techniques is an obvious advantage for excitation spectra. In solution studies, pg ml. 1 levels can often be determined, as compared to p,gmL-1 levels in absorption spectroscopy. The greater sensitivity of luminescence techniques stems from the fact that the... [Pg.320]

In good electron acceptor solvents, such as carbon tetrachloride and chloroform, the photodegradation of carotenoids is significantly increased as compared to other solvents (Christophersen et al. 1991, Mortensen and Skibsted 1999), because of a direct photoinduced electron-transfer reaction from the excited singlet state of the carotenoids to the solvent, as determined by transient absorption spectroscopy (Jeevarajan et al. 1996, Mortensen and Skibsted 1996,1997a,b, El-Agamey et al. 2005), Equation 12.2 ... [Pg.241]

The verification of the presence of hydrogen in the film has proved more controversial, primarily because many of the structural investigations have been carried out after the film has been dried in vacuo. An example of the problems here is the fact that electron diffraction, which has to be carried out in vacuo, reveals a relatively well-crystallised spinel lattice whose origin may be the comparatively high sample heating encountered in the electron beam. Moreover, the use of in situ techniques, such as Mossbauer and X-ray absorption spectroscopy, clearly reveals marked differences between the spectra of the films in situ and the spectra of the same films ex situ as well as the spectra of y-Fe203 and y-FeOOH standards. These differences are most naturally ascribed to hydration of the spinel forms. [Pg.331]

Brugmann et al. [680] compared three methods for the determination of copper, cadmium, lead, nickel, and zinc in North Sea and northeast Atlantic waters. Two methods consisted of atomic absorption spectroscopy but with preconcentration using either freon or methyl isobutyl ketone, and anodic stripping voltammetry was used for cadmium, copper, and lead only. Inexplicable discrepancies were found in almost all cases. The exceptions were the cadmium results by the two atomic absorption spectrometric methods, and the lead results from the freon with atomic absorption spectrometry and anodic scanning voltammetric methods. [Pg.243]

Jones and Isaac 16 ) compared atomic absorption spectroscopy and spark emission spectroscopy for the determination of several elements in plant tissue. By comparing results statistically using a t-test, no significant differences were found for calcium, manganese, iron, copper, zinc, and aluminium, but significant differences were found for potassium and magnesium at the 0.01 % level. Breck162) made a similar comparison study for 15 elements. [Pg.104]

McCracken et al. 164) compared atomic absorption with the tetraphenyl-boron method for determining potassium in 1190 fertilizers, and very close agreement was found between the two methods. Hoover and Reagor 16S) also found good agreement between the two methods, and atomic absorption was far more rapid. They reported that the 7665 A potassium line was more subject to interference than the less sensitive 4044 A line. Temperli and Misteli 166> reported far better results for low concentrations of potassium in soil extracts by atomic absorption spectroscopy than by flame emission spectroscopy. [Pg.105]

Nixon277 compared atomic absorption spectroscopy, flame photometry, mass spectroscopy, and neutron activation analysis as methods for the determination of some 21 trace elements (<100 ppm) in hard dental tissue and dental plaque silver, aluminum, arsenic, gold, barium, chromium, copper, fluoride, iron, lithium, manganese, molybdenum, nickel, lead, rubidium, antimony, selenium, tin, strontium, vanadium, and zinc. Brunelle 278) also described procedures for the determination of about 20 elements in soil using a combination of atomic absorption spectroscopy and neutron activation analysis. [Pg.106]

Two different instrumental measurements were used to test the oxidation hypothesis GC and atomic absorption (AA). GC was used to determine the chain length distribution of the EO. From the GC results, an average chain length number was calculated. The gas chromatogram is shown in Fig. 21.1. In addition, headspace GC measurement of the gaseous compounds dissolved in the liquid ethoxylate was made and compared to typical or good product. Atomic absorption spectroscopy was used to determine the levels of several trace metals known to catalyze oxidation of fatty chemicals. [Pg.803]


See other pages where Absorption spectroscopy, compared is mentioned: [Pg.1121]    [Pg.388]    [Pg.333]    [Pg.61]    [Pg.343]    [Pg.456]    [Pg.395]    [Pg.486]    [Pg.781]    [Pg.463]    [Pg.76]    [Pg.44]    [Pg.404]    [Pg.101]    [Pg.80]    [Pg.294]    [Pg.294]    [Pg.390]    [Pg.245]    [Pg.311]    [Pg.347]    [Pg.117]    [Pg.123]    [Pg.157]    [Pg.105]    [Pg.921]    [Pg.280]    [Pg.231]    [Pg.402]    [Pg.478]    [Pg.317]    [Pg.88]    [Pg.134]    [Pg.94]    [Pg.1380]    [Pg.280]    [Pg.317]   


SEARCH



Absorption spectroscopy, compared luminescence techniques

Graphite furnace atomic absorption spectroscopy , compared

Reflection-absorption spectroscopy compared with transmission

© 2024 chempedia.info