Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Yields, calculation optical

Finally, when working in the field of asymmetric synthesis, the organic chemist needs to quote both the chemical yield and the optical yield. The percentage optical yield or optical purity [enantiomeric excess (ee) %], is calculated thus ... [Pg.34]

In WZ QWs, the CHj bands are most split off from the HH and LH bands. However, the band mixing is the same as that in bulk GaN due to no change of the symmetry. Thus, the HH] mass is still heavy, and the DOS at the VBM is not so reduced. Then, the Z>-character, which yields the optical gain for the TM-mode, is very low at the VBM. This is the reason that the optical gain for the TE-mode is dominant in WZ GaN-based QWs. The following discussion is limited to the TE-mode, and we take the optical polarisation for the electric field as the y-direction in the calculations of the TE-mode. [Pg.200]

Tam et al. [141] attempted to determine how reliable and accurate CC and DFT/ TDDFT calculations are for this conformationally flexible molecule. In addition, they explored the sensitivity of the chiroptical response to two different factors. One was the accuracy of the mole fractions, and another was how different were the ORs of individual rotamers calculated at different levels of theory. It was found that with DFT, at the B3LYP/aug-cc-pVDZ level, the optical rotations were overestimated while CC yielded better agreement with experiment [141, 142], The predicted gas phase optical rotation, averaged by CC or DFT mole fractions, were not in good agreement with either gas or solution phase experimental measurements. The DFT calculated optical rotations differed between 15 and 65% from experiment. [Pg.30]

A process for the production of D-a-amino acids has been developed by Roche Diagnostics based on the enzyme D-hydantoinase [115]. The recombinant protein was covalently fixed onto a carrier and used for the synthesis of a broad range of natural and artificial D-amino acids (132, Scheme 41). Starting from racemic hydantoins d/l-130, the enzyme exclusively hydrolyzed d-130 to 131, and new d-130 was internally produced by continuous in situ racemization of l-130. The process worked especially well with 5-(p-hydroxyphenyl)- and 6-phenylhydantoin, affording the corresponding amino acids 132 in high yield and optical purity. The number of reuse cycles until 50% of the initial enzyme activity was reached was calculated to be as high as - 200. Unfortunately, this process has never been used in the production of D-amino acids, as diazotation was found to be too noxious and complicated. [Pg.301]

The residual o -methylbutyryl-L-norleucine that had been precipitated from ether solution by excess petroleum ether was refluxed with 200 mL 2 N HCl for 2.5 h. After cooling to 25°C, the solution was extracted with ether as above, and the residual oil was subjected to fractional distillation at 10 mmHg. The clear liquid boiled at 69-69.5°C, and after the second distillation amounted to 6.2 g. The d at 28°C was -5.5° for a 2-d.cm tube, and using a d25 value of 0.94, the calculated [a]25 was -3.0°. The original a-methylbutyryl-L-norleucine when treated in the same fashion, did not yield any optical activity. [Pg.1831]

The second-order nonlinear optical processes of SHG and SFG are described correspondingly by second-order perturbation theory. In this case, two photons at the drivmg frequency or frequencies are destroyed and a photon at the SH or SF is created. This is accomplished tlnough a succession of tlnee real or virtual transitions, as shown in figure Bl.5.4. These transitions start from an occupied initial energy eigenstate g), pass tlnough intennediate states n ) and n) and return to the initial state g). A fiill calculation of the second-order response for the case of SFG yields [37]... [Pg.1274]

Assuming that the reaction probability of all the elementary processes is equal in the reaction of 1,4-DCB crystals, the calculated yields of unreacted 1,4-DCB, cyclophane, and oligomer by simulation, should be 1.8, 37.7, and 60.5% by weight, respectively. Furthermore, if all the photoexcited species of the monocyclic dimer are assumed to be converted into cyclophane, these yields should become 6.9, 65.6 and 27.5%. It is, therefore, rather surprising that in an extreme case of the experiment the yield of cyclophane is more than 90% while the amount of unreacted 1,4-DCB is less than 2%. One plausible mechanism to explain this result is that the first formation of cyclophane induces the successive formation of cyclophane so as to enhance its final yield. If such an induction mechanism plays an appreciable role, an optically active cyclophane zone may be formed, at least in a micro spot surrounding the first molecule of cyclophane, as illustrated in Scheme 13. The assumption of an induction mechanism was verified later in the photoreaction of 7 OMe crystals (see p. 151). [Pg.158]

The hydrogenation of ehtyl pyurvate (EtPy) was carried out at 23 °C in a SS autoclave equipped with an injection chamber for separate introduction of the modifier Cinchonidine (CD) and Troger s base (TB) was used as modifiers. Different batches of EtPy, (Fluka) and Pt/Al203 catalysts (Engelhard E 4759, 5 %w Pt, Dpt = 25 %) were used. Experimental details incliding GC analysis can be found elsewhere [3,12]. The optical yield was calculated as e.e. = ([R]-[S])/([R]+[S]). The e.e. values were corrected for the amount of racemic product formed in minor amount in the reactor prior to the injection of CD. [Pg.242]

Two kinetic experiments with different CD concentrations were used for kinetic modeling. In this simulation all of the rate constants not involved in the hydrogenation step were not altered. The calculated and simulated kinetic curves and optical yield-conversion dependencies are shown in Figure 9a and 9b. The results of kinetic modeling indicates that the whole kinetic curve and the optical yield - conversion dependencies can be well described by a kinetic model derived from the shielding effect model. [Pg.249]

The e.e., also called optical yield (OY), is defined as the selectivity of an enantioselective reaction and is expressed as e.e. It can be calculated from the formula... [Pg.496]

Cervinka has employed these reagents in the asymmetric reduction of im-monium salts (49,50) and imines (51). The reduction of 2-substituted jV-methyl-A -tetrahydropyridinium perchlorates (10) with (— )-menthol-LAH in ether or THF led to optically active piperidine derivatives (eq. [10]). The optical purity obtained for the Pr" derivative was 12%. In the case of R = Me and Pr" the configuration of the predominant enantiomer was shown to be S. The (-)-menthol-LAH reagent was similarly shown to reduce l-methyl-2-alkyl-A -di-hydropyrrolinium perchlorates (11) to optically active pyrrolidine derivatives (eq. [11]). The optical yield could be calculated only for R = CH2Ph, and was only 6% (/ enantiomer) obtained with a 1 1 (— )-menthoi-LAH reagent. With 2 1 or 3 1 molar ratios of menthol LAH, the optical yield decreased. The... [Pg.241]

For excited state calculations, significant progress has been made based on the GW method first introduced by Hybertsen and Louie. [29] By considering quasi-partide and local field effects, this scheme has allowed accurate calculations of band gaps, which are usually underestimated when using the LDA. This GW approach has been applied to a variety of crystals, and it yields optical spectra in good agreement with experiment. [Pg.262]

In practice, the ion optical properties of an ion source are optimized by means of ion trajectory calculations. [31] The standard tool for this task is the SIMION software suite, [32-35] while there are others, too. [36] Thus, the optimum number, positions, voltages, and eventually shapes of the plates are determined (Fig. 5.11). In order to compensate for slight mechanical deviations from theory and for effects exerted by contamination of the plates during elongated use, the voltages can be adjusted to yield optimum conditions. [Pg.205]


See other pages where Yields, calculation optical is mentioned: [Pg.82]    [Pg.24]    [Pg.547]    [Pg.191]    [Pg.147]    [Pg.99]    [Pg.201]    [Pg.229]    [Pg.1109]    [Pg.38]    [Pg.370]    [Pg.1884]    [Pg.2838]    [Pg.162]    [Pg.301]    [Pg.704]    [Pg.213]    [Pg.40]    [Pg.23]    [Pg.262]    [Pg.444]    [Pg.249]    [Pg.207]    [Pg.114]    [Pg.141]    [Pg.135]    [Pg.75]    [Pg.85]    [Pg.122]    [Pg.235]    [Pg.175]    [Pg.382]    [Pg.242]    [Pg.158]    [Pg.220]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.34 ]




SEARCH



Optical calculation

Optical yields

Yield, calculation

© 2024 chempedia.info