Workers compensation performance

Workers compensation insurance as required by laws and regulations applicable to and covering employees of the toller engaged in the performance of the manufacturing services. 

Etisability and health status Can you perform the essential requirements of this job, with or without reasonable accommodation Do you have any disabilities Do you have any conditions that might require accommodation What is your medical history Have you ever filed a workers compensation claim at a former employer ... 

Low-back injury is estimated to cost the U.S. industry tens of biUions annually through compensation claims, lost workdays, reduced productivity, and retraining needs (NIOSH 1997 Cats-Baril and Fry-moyer 1991 Frymoyer et al. 1983). Approximately 33% of aU workers compensation costs are for musculoskeletal disorders. Experience has shown that these injuries can be avoided with the proper ergonomic intervention. Biomechanical models available can be used for job analysis either proactively, during the design phase, or reactively in response to injury incidence, to help identify the injurious situations. The most common types of injury-assessment analyses performed using human models include low-back compression force analysis and strength analysis. 

Harshbarger, D., Rose, T. (1991). New possibilities in safety performance and the control of workers compensation costs. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 1, 133-143. 

Ohio Bureau of Workers Compensation. (2011). Ohio 21(d) SHARP Program Performance... 

Knowledge as to a contractor s performance can be provided by their insurance company. They calculate an experience modification rate (EMR) for the previous 3 years. It is the ratio of the Actual Workers Compensation Losses to the Expected Workers Compensation Losses. ... 

Later, while researching for Chapter 24, Measurement of Safety Performance, I observed that companies with superior OSHA rates also had lower workers compensation costs than did other companies. I then wanted to determine whether the quality of investigation of hazards-related incidents would also be superior. (For this second study, it must also be said that the methodology used would not stand the test of good science.)... 

Experience rating is mandatory for all employers who buy workers compensation insurance from insurance companies. For those employers, experience rating is one of the historical performance measures that can be used, cautiously, as an indicator of the quality of safety in place. Self-insured companies would not have workers compensation experience modifications. 

If it was possible to obtain accurate and current workers compensation claims costs, a trending of that data would be the best performance indicator for most companies, since the data would be expressed in financial terms. That is a language that managements understand. Unfortunately, the actual cost of individual claims is not immediately known. For claims reported in a given year, the actual costs may not be finalized for as long as six or more years. 

Still, workers compensation costs present opportunities for computation as performance measures. With the help of insurance personnel, fairly good estimates of the expected claims costs for an ensuing year can be made, provided that there are no catastrophic occurrences. With that data, interesting and useful performance indicators can be computed. Some examples follow. 

But, using workers compensation costs per hour won t get much attention in a company in which the culture has required and achieved exceptionally good safety performance. For a company that has operations the public would consider high hazard, the annual workers compensation cost per employee has recently ranged a bit plus or minus of 100. That computes at 0.05 per hour. A 20% reduction nets the employer 0.01 per hour, or 20 per employee per year. Not very impressive. 

The actuarial premises on which the workers compensation experience rating system was developed give credibility to OSHA incident recordable and lost workday case rates as measures, and predictors, of safety performance, with these qualifications The statistical base (the hours worked) on which the records are developed has to be large enough and low probability-severe outcome risks may not be encompassed within the experience base. 

Do the OSHA statistics—the recordable case rate and the lost workday case rate —for an exposure of 1,000,000 hours have a confidence level of, say, 68.27%, as measures of the quality of safety performance An entity of this size would more than likely purchase workers compensation insurance and have an experience modification as an additional measure. 

The Federal Employment Compensation Act provides workers compensation for nonmilitary, federal employees. Many of its provisions remain typical of most workers compensation laws. Many times awards remain limited to disability or death sustained while in the performance of the employee s duties. The act covers medical expenses due to the disability and may require... 

Trailing indicators are the traditional metrics that measure past safety efforts (Dupont Corporation 2000). When using trailing indicators, data is collected after the fact (after a number of accidents or illnesses, after two years of workers compensation, etc.). Trailing indicators provide an organization with feedback in terms of how good performance has been over a period of time. Examples of trailing indicators include accident records, loss reports, injury and illness statistics, injury costs, and workers compensation costs. 

Common measures for a safety program s performance are insurance expenses and losses. A cost that is often tracked by safety professionals is the organization s worker compensation premiums. Workers compensation premiums can be calculated in a number of different ways. However, regardless of the method for determining premiums, they provide an excellent indicator for safety performance in the workplace. 

With these activity-based performance measures, there is also a variety of safety metrics that can be used to assess program performance. As identified by OSHA in studies ofVPP organizations, OSHA injury incidence rates, lost work day rates, and workers compensation losses are a few safety metrics that have been correlated to the performance of the VPP criteria activities. These measures can easily be expanded to include unsafe behaviors, accident trends, and near misses. 

Each workers compensation claim is either directly or indirectly a drain on the profit margin of the company. This is the primary business reason to track workers compensation claims. Many employers who have a less than stellar experience modification rate (EMR) may have difficulty in procuring work, or bidding on work, when perspective buyers assess their safety and health performance. 

---