Wish list, performance

While the plan itself is not auditable by third parties, it may be auditable by second parties i.e. customers. The third party or registrar is entitled to examine the plan to ascertain that it is what it proclaims to be. The particulars are of no concern except those aspects relating to quality, such as the resources, quality objectives, customer satisfaction plans, and performance metrics. Whatever is stated on these aspects, the auditors will expect to see evidence that the business plan is not merely a wish list and that provisions have been made to enable implementation through the quality system. 

To enhance the performance of an existing reactor technology/hardware, a typical wish list could be ... 

For each of these subsets we have further provided a checklist of reactor parameters that need to be examined. The choice of each item in the checklist is made on the basis of a wish list, set up right at the beginning of the reactor selection exercise. Figure 37 presents a summary of the reactor attributes and considerations along with a commonly used wish list. In the discussions we have stressed the point that a disciplined approach may unravel novel ways of improving reactor performance this has been demonstrated by means of several examples. 

Typical wish list for enhancing the performance of the existing reactor technology can be ... 

In general, the FDA expects the manufacturer to be the holder. If a manufacturer (Company A) of a MATERIAL wishes to have the DMF submitted by another company (Company B) and Company B wishes to act as the holder, the DMF must include statements from both companies that Company B takes full responsibility for all the information in the DMF and for all the processes and testing performed by the manufacturer. The title of the DMF that will appear on the list of DMFs will be MATERIAL manufactured by COMPANY A in LOCATION OF COMPANY A for COMPANY B. ... 

The author wishes to thank the various organizations listed in Table I who supplied samples studied in this work. The author also wishes to thank D. J. Miller and D. H. Neal of the Grand Forks Energy Research Center who performed much of the experimental work. 

This chapter assumes the point of view of an expert who wishes to evaluate the safety of a modem plant at a specific site and firstly decides to perform checks on those key aspects where it is most likely to find areas that can be improved. The content lists and discusses some of these aspects. It is impossible to be exhaustive in the most general terms as many fundamental aspects are connected with the specific features of each single case, for example the compliance between plant characteristics and assumptions made in the study of accidents. In any case, if the evaluation of a case under scrutiny shows that any aspect among those listed in the following, has been omitted or not adequately dealt with, then this fact should be noted and corrected. 

Normally, the job steps for a JSA/JHA are listed in logical sequence. Some workers, however, may wish to change the sequence for one reason or another. For example, one operator may choose to check fluid levels before he or she does a general walk-around. This type of flexibility is good for worker morale and productivity. However, on the other hand, there are times when the sequence of the job steps or deviations from the job steps are critical to safe performance of the job. An example of this is that the walk-around inspection must be made and safety deficiencies corrected before the machine is put into service for the day. It would not be safe or proper to do the walk-around inspection after the machine has been put into service. 

The Safety Assessment section summarizes what safety activities are performed and when. Also, the types of safety analysis techniques used are listed. Chapters 5 through 9 detail numerous system safety analysis tools. The reader may wish to pick a few of the techniques addressed in Chapters 5 through 9 and briefly describe them in this section. 

The solution is to maintain two (redundant) data structures to store the current walk configuration a linear or circular list as described in the preceding subsection, and a bit table or hash table. The latter can be defined abstractly as data structiures that perform the following functions Given a finite (but typically enormous) set K of possible keywords , we wish to store a subset H CK oi cardinality < some maximum M) in such a way that, for any x K, the following operations can be carried out rapidly ... 

---